Pivoting Open? Pandemic Pedagogy and the Search for Openness in the Viral Learning Environment

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Interactive Media in Education Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5334/jime.676
Leo Havemann, Verena Roberts
{"title":"Pivoting Open? Pandemic Pedagogy and the Search for Openness in the Viral Learning Environment","authors":"Leo Havemann, Verena Roberts","doi":"10.5334/jime.676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is based on the authors' experiences and reflections working in educational technology and design support roles in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. We retrace our lived experience from the beginning of the pandemic in the spring (from our vantage points in the UK and Canada) and the associated 'pivot online' enacted in education around the world, through to the autumn of 2020, when we appeared to be transitioning into a so-called 'new normal' of the mid-pandemic. As digital education practitioners, who are also educators. researchers, and also simply as humans and friends living through a global pandemic, we had turned to each other initially for support in terms of work, wellness, and sharing news, information and sense-making, during which we began to consider researching under-examined dimensions of the evolving situation. The experiences and issues we reference are drawn from our own work, as well as from our responses to popular narratives advanced by key voices who have encouraged certain interpretations of the pandemic and its educational effects. Using Schon's (1983) reflection-in-action lens, we examine these experiences and narratives of pandemic pedagogy through the frame of our multiple identities. In particular, from our perspective as researchers and advocates of open education, we noted calls for openness (such as the use of open educational resources) in response to the online pivot, which did not appear to be cutting through the noise of the sudden deluge of information, advice and broadly negative coverage of online teaching. However, through our reflective narrative and synthesis, we offer an alternative interpretation, which is that openness was nonetheless flourishing, but that the 'pivot open' was to practices rather than resources. Open exchange, community building and support amongst educators were apparent in multiple contexts. While pandemic profiteering has highlighted the need for open resources and infrastructures, and we anticipate this case continuing to be made more strongly as we emerge from the emergency, it is the turn to open practices which has met the immediate needs of educators and learners through community, interactions. sharing and care.","PeriodicalId":45406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interactive Media in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interactive Media in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper is based on the authors' experiences and reflections working in educational technology and design support roles in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. We retrace our lived experience from the beginning of the pandemic in the spring (from our vantage points in the UK and Canada) and the associated 'pivot online' enacted in education around the world, through to the autumn of 2020, when we appeared to be transitioning into a so-called 'new normal' of the mid-pandemic. As digital education practitioners, who are also educators. researchers, and also simply as humans and friends living through a global pandemic, we had turned to each other initially for support in terms of work, wellness, and sharing news, information and sense-making, during which we began to consider researching under-examined dimensions of the evolving situation. The experiences and issues we reference are drawn from our own work, as well as from our responses to popular narratives advanced by key voices who have encouraged certain interpretations of the pandemic and its educational effects. Using Schon's (1983) reflection-in-action lens, we examine these experiences and narratives of pandemic pedagogy through the frame of our multiple identities. In particular, from our perspective as researchers and advocates of open education, we noted calls for openness (such as the use of open educational resources) in response to the online pivot, which did not appear to be cutting through the noise of the sudden deluge of information, advice and broadly negative coverage of online teaching. However, through our reflective narrative and synthesis, we offer an alternative interpretation, which is that openness was nonetheless flourishing, but that the 'pivot open' was to practices rather than resources. Open exchange, community building and support amongst educators were apparent in multiple contexts. While pandemic profiteering has highlighted the need for open resources and infrastructures, and we anticipate this case continuing to be made more strongly as we emerge from the emergency, it is the turn to open practices which has met the immediate needs of educators and learners through community, interactions. sharing and care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旋转打开吗?流行病教学法和在病毒学习环境中寻求开放性
本文基于作者在新冠肺炎大流行期间从事教育技术和设计高等教育支持角色工作的经验和思考。我们回顾了从春季大流行开始(从我们在英国和加拿大的有利位置)以及世界各地教育中实施的相关“在线枢纽”到2020年秋季的生活经历,当时我们似乎正在过渡到大流行中期的所谓“新常态”。作为数字教育的实践者,他们也是教育者。研究人员,也只是作为人类和朋友生活在全球大流行中,我们最初在工作、健康、分享新闻、信息和理解方面相互寻求支持,在此期间,我们开始考虑研究不断变化的形势中尚未得到充分研究的方面。我们所引用的经验和问题来自我们自己的工作,以及我们对鼓励对这一流行病及其教育影响作出某些解释的主要声音提出的流行叙述的回应。利用Schon(1983)的“行动中的反思”(reflection-in-action)视角,我们通过多重身份的框架来审视这些流行病教学法的经验和叙述。特别是,从我们作为开放教育的研究者和倡导者的角度来看,我们注意到对开放的呼吁(例如使用开放教育资源)是对在线支点的回应,在线支点似乎并没有消除突然泛滥的信息、建议和广泛的负面报道所带来的噪音。然而,通过我们的反思性叙述和综合,我们提供了另一种解释,即开放仍然蓬勃发展,但“枢纽开放”是实践而不是资源。教育工作者之间的开放交流、社区建设和支持在多种情况下都很明显。虽然大流行病牟取暴利突出了对开放资源和基础设施的需要,而且我们预计,随着我们摆脱紧急情况,这种情况将继续更加强烈,但正是转向开放做法,通过社区互动满足了教育工作者和学习者的眼前需求。分享和关怀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Journal of Interactive Media in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Digital Scholarship from the Periphery: Insights from Researchers in Chile on Academia.edu and ResearchGate Interacting through Blogs in Theatre/Drama Education: A Greek Case Study Factual vs. Fake News: Teachers’ Lens on Critical Media Literacy Education in EFL Classes An Overview of Student Perceptions of Hybrid Flexible Learning at a London HEI Investigating the Views and Use of Stackable Microcredentials within a Postgraduate Certificate in Academic Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1