{"title":"A Strategic Institutional Response to Micro-Credentials: Key Questions for Educational Leaders","authors":"Mark Brown, R. McGreal, Mitchell Peters","doi":"10.5334/jime.801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article responds to the rise of the micro-credential movement. It evidences the heightened attention politicians, policy-makers and educational leaders are giving to micro-credentials by framing the discussion in several recent high-level policy developments, an exponential growth in the number of academic publications and the increasing level of interest shown by popular media. It follows that micro-credentials appear to be high on the change agenda for many higher education institutions (HEIs), especially in the post-COVID-19 environment. However, the emergence of the micro-credential raises several crucial questions for educational leaders, set against fear of missing out. Importantly, the paper identifies a significant gap in the literature regarding leadership and strategic institutional responses to micro-credentials. Indeed, there is a dearth of literature. Leadership is crucial to the success of any educational change or innovation, so five key questions are presented for institutional leaders. They challenge institutions to make strategic decisions around how they engage with and position micro-credentials. If micro-credentials are part of an HEI's change agenda, then serious consideration needs to be given to the type of leadership and internal structures required to develop and execute a successful micro-credential strategy. Consideration must also be given to fit-for-purpose business models and how to mitigate potential risks. We hope to bring these strategic questions to the table as institutions plan, envision and develop their micro-credential strategies. © 2023 The Author(s).","PeriodicalId":45406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interactive Media in Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interactive Media in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
对微证书的战略性制度回应:教育领导者的关键问题
本文回应了微证书运动的兴起。它证明了政治家、决策者和教育领袖对微观证书的高度重视,将讨论纳入最近几项高级别政策发展,学术出版物数量呈指数级增长,大众媒体表现出越来越高的兴趣。因此,微证书似乎是许多高等教育机构(HEIs)变革议程上的重点,特别是在covid -19后的环境中。然而,微证书的出现给教育领导者提出了几个关键问题,因为他们担心错过机会。重要的是,本文确定了关于领导和战略机构对微证书的反应的文献中的重大差距。的确,文学作品匮乏。领导力对于任何教育变革或创新的成功都至关重要,因此向机构领导者提出了五个关键问题。它们要求机构围绕如何参与和定位微证书做出战略决策。如果微型证书是高等教育机构变革议程的一部分,那么就需要认真考虑制定和执行成功的微型证书战略所需的领导类型和内部结构。还必须考虑适合目的的业务模式以及如何减轻潜在风险。我们希望在机构规划、设想和发展其微证书战略时,将这些战略问题提上日程。©2023作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。