Doubt in terms of Kalam and Philosophy

Yunus Eraslan
{"title":"Doubt in terms of Kalam and Philosophy","authors":"Yunus Eraslan","doi":"10.51702/esoguifd.1133153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of doubt has been the common issue of religions and philosophy in the epistemological sense in the historical process. This concept, which is used in depth and diversity in the history of philosophy, has been used more functionally for research and questioning purposes in Islamic thought. In this context, three types of doubt can be mentioned in terms of philosophy: septic, methodical and fideistic. While skepticism, which is the first of these doubt types in Islamic thought, has been criticized as being equivalent to denialism, skeptical fideism has not been accepted in the context of religious texts that give importance and value to reason and research. Methodical doubt has been encouraged both in religious texts and Islamic thought in order to reach true and precise knowledge in terms of research and questioning. For this reason, in this study, starting from the Ancient Age, the types of doubt and doubt will be examined in terms of philosophy, then these types of doubt will be compared in terms of religious texts and theological thought, and their importance and value in terms of Islamic thought will be revealed.","PeriodicalId":33212,"journal":{"name":"Eskisehir Osmangazi Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eskisehir Osmangazi Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51702/esoguifd.1133153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of doubt has been the common issue of religions and philosophy in the epistemological sense in the historical process. This concept, which is used in depth and diversity in the history of philosophy, has been used more functionally for research and questioning purposes in Islamic thought. In this context, three types of doubt can be mentioned in terms of philosophy: septic, methodical and fideistic. While skepticism, which is the first of these doubt types in Islamic thought, has been criticized as being equivalent to denialism, skeptical fideism has not been accepted in the context of religious texts that give importance and value to reason and research. Methodical doubt has been encouraged both in religious texts and Islamic thought in order to reach true and precise knowledge in terms of research and questioning. For this reason, in this study, starting from the Ancient Age, the types of doubt and doubt will be examined in terms of philosophy, then these types of doubt will be compared in terms of religious texts and theological thought, and their importance and value in terms of Islamic thought will be revealed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡拉姆和哲学方面的怀疑
在历史进程中,怀疑概念一直是宗教和哲学在认识论意义上的共同问题。这一概念在哲学史上被深度和多样性地使用,在伊斯兰思想中被更多地用于研究和质疑目的。在这种情况下,可以从哲学的角度提到三种类型的怀疑:化脓性怀疑、系统性怀疑和信仰性怀疑。怀疑主义是伊斯兰思想中的第一种怀疑类型,它被批评为等同于否定主义,而怀疑主义的信仰主义在给予理性和研究重要性和价值的宗教文本背景下并未被接受。在宗教文本和伊斯兰思想中都鼓励有系统的怀疑,以便在研究和提问方面获得真实和精确的知识。因此,在本研究中,从古代开始,将怀疑和怀疑的类型从哲学的角度进行考察,然后将这些类型的怀疑从宗教文本和神学思想的角度进行比较,并揭示它们在伊斯兰思想中的重要性和价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Political Activities of Palace Women during Banu Ahmer (Nasrid) Period in al-Andalus Spiritual Education and Practices in Early Childhood According to the Waldorf Approach Aliens as Creator Gods in Hollywood Cinema Türk ve Arap Şiirinde Anka Kuşu Motifine Batı Etkisi: Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme Fahrüddin Râzî’ye Göre Kelâmın Aklî Konuları İspatta Kullandığı Öncüller
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1