Can Artificial Intelligence (AI) Machine be Granted Inventorship in India?

G. R. Raghavender, Gurujit Singh
{"title":"Can Artificial Intelligence (AI) Machine be Granted Inventorship in India?","authors":"G. R. Raghavender, Gurujit Singh","doi":"10.56042/jipr.v28i2.1268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) is prolific emerging algorithmic general purpose technology that helps inventors in the innovation process or is a component of an invention. AI-assisted inventions and other computer-related inventions (CRIs) generally have few significant differences. A simple instrument for creativity, machines are now a significant contribution to creation because to AI advancements. Medical researchers are using AI machines to find new drugs. These automated systems, also known as “innovative AI”, have been helping to develop new inventions with little to no human involvement. 1 Since AI's contribution and autonomous invention process is exponentially growing, there have been instances where a patent applicant has opted to name an AI programme as the inventor in a patent application. The patent offices of the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and New Zealand recently rejected a patent application seeking inventorship for an AI computer. Australia and South Africa, on the other hand, have recognised AI as an inventor. In light of the various approaches used around the world, this article examines the key question that emerges in patent granting: can an AI system that is not a natural person be recognised as an inventor and granted a patent in India, including inventorship and ownership?","PeriodicalId":39166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v28i2.1268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is prolific emerging algorithmic general purpose technology that helps inventors in the innovation process or is a component of an invention. AI-assisted inventions and other computer-related inventions (CRIs) generally have few significant differences. A simple instrument for creativity, machines are now a significant contribution to creation because to AI advancements. Medical researchers are using AI machines to find new drugs. These automated systems, also known as “innovative AI”, have been helping to develop new inventions with little to no human involvement. 1 Since AI's contribution and autonomous invention process is exponentially growing, there have been instances where a patent applicant has opted to name an AI programme as the inventor in a patent application. The patent offices of the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and New Zealand recently rejected a patent application seeking inventorship for an AI computer. Australia and South Africa, on the other hand, have recognised AI as an inventor. In light of the various approaches used around the world, this article examines the key question that emerges in patent granting: can an AI system that is not a natural person be recognised as an inventor and granted a patent in India, including inventorship and ownership?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度可以授予人工智能(AI)机器发明权吗?
人工智能(AI)是一种多产的新兴算法通用技术,可以帮助发明者在创新过程中或作为发明的组成部分。人工智能辅助发明与其他计算机相关发明(cri)通常没有显著差异。作为创造的简单工具,机器现在对创造做出了重大贡献,因为它促进了人工智能的进步。医学研究人员正在使用人工智能机器寻找新药。这些自动化系统,也被称为“创新人工智能”,一直在帮助开发几乎没有人参与的新发明。由于人工智能的贡献和自主发明过程呈指数级增长,已经出现了专利申请人在专利申请中选择将人工智能程序命名为发明人的情况。美国、英国、欧盟和新西兰的专利局最近拒绝了一项寻求人工智能计算机发明权的专利申请。另一方面,澳大利亚和南非已经承认人工智能是一个发明者。鉴于世界各地使用的各种方法,本文研究了专利授予中出现的关键问题:在印度,非自然人的人工智能系统是否可以被视为发明人并获得专利,包括发明人和所有权?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
The Interplay between Contemporary Art and Copyright Law Ethics and IPR - Much Needed Legal Solutions for Tomorrow Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the Third Decade of Twenty-First Century (2020–2023) — VI Economic Justification of Traditional knowledge with Insights from Identity Economics Pre-Grant Opposition: CSIR v Ms Hindustan Lever Limited
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1