Self-Management Interventions to Prevent the Secondary Condition of Pain in People with Disability Due to Mobility Limitations

IF 2.3 Q1 REHABILITATION Rehabilitation Process and Outcome Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.4137/RPO.S12339
Katherine Froehlich-Grobe, S. Driver, Katherine D. Sanches
{"title":"Self-Management Interventions to Prevent the Secondary Condition of Pain in People with Disability Due to Mobility Limitations","authors":"Katherine Froehlich-Grobe, S. Driver, Katherine D. Sanches","doi":"10.4137/RPO.S12339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction This focused review examines the use and effectiveness of self-management strategies in preventing or managing pain, which is among the most common secondary conditions faced by individuals with a mobility disability. Methods This focused review was part of a two-phase comprehensive scoping review. Phase I was a comprehensive scoping review of the literature targeting multiple outcomes of self-management interventions for those with mobility impairment, and Phase II was a focused review of the literature on self-management interventions that target pain as a primary or secondary outcome. Two authors searched CINAHL, PubMed, and PsyclNFO for papers published from January 1988 through August 2014 using specified search terms. Following the scoping review, the authors independently screened and selected the studies and reviewed the eligible studies, and the first author extracted data from the included studies. Results The scoping review yielded 40 studies that addressed pain self-management interventions for those living with mobility impairment. These 40 accumulated papers revealed a heterogeneous evidence base in terms of setting (clinic, community, and online), target populations, intervention duration (3 weeks to 24 months), and mode (health-care providers and lay leaders). Most of the reviewed studies reported that the self-management intervention led to significant reduction of pain over time, suggesting that self-management may be a promising approach for addressing pain experienced by people who live with mobility limitations. Discussion This review also reveals moderate-to-high bias across studies, and findings indicate that future research should enhance the methodological quality to provide stronger evidence about the effectiveness of self-management strategies for reducing pain among those with mobility impairments.","PeriodicalId":41347,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Process and Outcome","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/RPO.S12339","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Process and Outcome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/RPO.S12339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction This focused review examines the use and effectiveness of self-management strategies in preventing or managing pain, which is among the most common secondary conditions faced by individuals with a mobility disability. Methods This focused review was part of a two-phase comprehensive scoping review. Phase I was a comprehensive scoping review of the literature targeting multiple outcomes of self-management interventions for those with mobility impairment, and Phase II was a focused review of the literature on self-management interventions that target pain as a primary or secondary outcome. Two authors searched CINAHL, PubMed, and PsyclNFO for papers published from January 1988 through August 2014 using specified search terms. Following the scoping review, the authors independently screened and selected the studies and reviewed the eligible studies, and the first author extracted data from the included studies. Results The scoping review yielded 40 studies that addressed pain self-management interventions for those living with mobility impairment. These 40 accumulated papers revealed a heterogeneous evidence base in terms of setting (clinic, community, and online), target populations, intervention duration (3 weeks to 24 months), and mode (health-care providers and lay leaders). Most of the reviewed studies reported that the self-management intervention led to significant reduction of pain over time, suggesting that self-management may be a promising approach for addressing pain experienced by people who live with mobility limitations. Discussion This review also reveals moderate-to-high bias across studies, and findings indicate that future research should enhance the methodological quality to provide stronger evidence about the effectiveness of self-management strategies for reducing pain among those with mobility impairments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我管理干预措施,以防止继发性疼痛的残疾人由于行动限制
这篇重点综述探讨了自我管理策略在预防或管理疼痛方面的使用和有效性,疼痛是行动障碍患者面临的最常见的继发性疾病之一。方法本综述是两阶段综合范围综述的一部分。第一阶段是对针对行动障碍患者自我管理干预的多种结果的文献的全面范围审查,第二阶段是对以疼痛为主要或次要结果的自我管理干预的文献的重点审查。两位作者使用指定的搜索词检索了从1988年1月到2014年8月期间发表的论文,检索了CINAHL、PubMed和PsyclNFO。在范围审查之后,作者独立筛选和选择研究并审查符合条件的研究,第一作者从纳入的研究中提取数据。结果:范围审查产生了40项研究,涉及行动障碍患者的疼痛自我管理干预。这40篇累积的论文揭示了在环境(诊所、社区和在线)、目标人群、干预持续时间(3周到24个月)和模式(卫生保健提供者和非专业领导)方面的异质性证据基础。大多数回顾的研究报告说,自我管理干预导致疼痛随着时间的推移显著减少,这表明自我管理可能是解决行动不便的人所经历的疼痛的一种有前途的方法。本综述还揭示了研究的中高偏倚,研究结果表明,未来的研究应提高方法质量,为减少行动障碍患者疼痛的自我管理策略的有效性提供更有力的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Advances in Rehabilitation Science and Practice (AdvRSP) Editorial: A Journal Showcasing Exciting Developments in the Field of Rehabilitation in Medical Conditions. A Proposal for Expansion of the Medical Specialty of Rehabilitation Medicine. Verification of the Integrative Model of Adjustment to Chronic Conditions by Mapping it Onto the World Health Organization's International Classification of Function, Disability and Health. TEleRehabilitation Nepal (TERN) for People With Spinal Cord Injury and Acquired Brain Injury: A Feasibility Study. Remote Delivery of Service: A Survey of Occupational Therapists' Perceptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1