Could FEF 25–75 levels or blood eosinophil counts predict the presence or absence of bronchial hyperreactivity?

IF 0.1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ejop.ejop_64_21
K. Aksu, Ali Fırıncıoğluları, Ezgi Erdem, F. Aksu
{"title":"Could FEF 25–75 levels or blood eosinophil counts predict the presence or absence of bronchial hyperreactivity?","authors":"K. Aksu, Ali Fırıncıoğluları, Ezgi Erdem, F. Aksu","doi":"10.4103/ejop.ejop_64_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND AIM: The relationship between bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) and lung function parameters and blood eosinophilia in suspected asthmatics is not clear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between FEF 25-75 values and blood eosinophilia levels and BHR in patients with asthma symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Demographic and spirometric data and blood eosinophil counts were compared between patients with and without significant BHR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate FEF25–75 and blood eosinophil count cutoff values to distinguish BHR in these patients. RESULTS: According to the data of 894 patients, with BHR in 182 (20.4%), FEF25%–75% were significantly lower and blood eosinophil counts were significantly higher in patients with BHR. The best discriminatory values to assess the nonevident BHR were 64.5% for FEF25–75 (sensitivity: 94.2% and specificity: 18.7%) and 164/μL for blood eosinophil count (sensitivity: 59.6% and specificity 60.2%). The rate of nonevident BHR was significantly different between patients with FEF25–75 <65% and ≥65% (54.7% and 81.9%, respectively, P < 0.001). Although significant, the rates of nonevident BHR in patients with blood eosinophil counts below and above the cutoff (85.5% and 72.6%, respectively, P = 0.012) were not as different as the rates in patients with FEF25–75 values below and above the cutoff. CONCLUSION: FEF25–75 is associated with BHR in patients with asthma symptoms. Nonevident BHR is more likely if FEF25–75 ≥65 in suspected asthmatics. However, blood eosinophil count is not helpful in predicting the absence of BHR in suspected asthmatics.","PeriodicalId":42933,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejop.ejop_64_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The relationship between bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) and lung function parameters and blood eosinophilia in suspected asthmatics is not clear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between FEF 25-75 values and blood eosinophilia levels and BHR in patients with asthma symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Demographic and spirometric data and blood eosinophil counts were compared between patients with and without significant BHR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate FEF25–75 and blood eosinophil count cutoff values to distinguish BHR in these patients. RESULTS: According to the data of 894 patients, with BHR in 182 (20.4%), FEF25%–75% were significantly lower and blood eosinophil counts were significantly higher in patients with BHR. The best discriminatory values to assess the nonevident BHR were 64.5% for FEF25–75 (sensitivity: 94.2% and specificity: 18.7%) and 164/μL for blood eosinophil count (sensitivity: 59.6% and specificity 60.2%). The rate of nonevident BHR was significantly different between patients with FEF25–75 <65% and ≥65% (54.7% and 81.9%, respectively, P < 0.001). Although significant, the rates of nonevident BHR in patients with blood eosinophil counts below and above the cutoff (85.5% and 72.6%, respectively, P = 0.012) were not as different as the rates in patients with FEF25–75 values below and above the cutoff. CONCLUSION: FEF25–75 is associated with BHR in patients with asthma symptoms. Nonevident BHR is more likely if FEF25–75 ≥65 in suspected asthmatics. However, blood eosinophil count is not helpful in predicting the absence of BHR in suspected asthmatics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FEF 25-75水平或血嗜酸性粒细胞计数能否预测支气管高反应性的存在与否?
背景与目的:支气管高反应性(BHR)与疑似哮喘患者肺功能参数及血嗜酸性粒细胞的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨哮喘患者FEF 25-75值与血嗜酸性粒细胞水平和BHR的关系。材料和方法:比较有和无明显BHR患者的人口统计学和肺活量测定数据以及嗜酸性粒细胞计数。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,评价FEF25-75和血嗜酸性粒细胞计数临界值,以区分BHR患者。结果:894例患者资料显示,BHR患者中182例(20.4%)fef25% ~ 75%显著降低,血嗜酸性粒细胞计数显著升高。FEF25-75的最佳鉴别值为64.5%(灵敏度:94.2%,特异性:18.7%),血嗜酸性粒细胞计数为164/μL(灵敏度:59.6%,特异性:60.2%)。FEF25-75 <65%和≥65%患者的非明显BHR发生率差异有统计学意义(分别为54.7%和81.9%,P < 0.001)。尽管有统计学意义,但在嗜酸性粒细胞计数低于和高于临界值的患者中(分别为85.5%和72.6%,P = 0.012),非明显BHR的发生率与FEF25-75低于和高于临界值的患者的发生率差异不大。结论:哮喘患者FEF25-75与BHR相关。疑似哮喘患者FEF25-75≥65时更可能出现不明显的BHR。然而,血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数对预测疑似哮喘患者BHR缺失没有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology
Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The relationship between thyroid transcription factor-1 positivity and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in lung adenocarcinoma and its prognostic significance IL-6 level but not MBL level is associated with disease severity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 Effects of one-leg exercises in rehabilitation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review Pulmonary embolism as the first sign of hepatocellular carcinoma in a patient who was cured after five years Acute Interstitial Pneumonia Associated with Vinorelbine Usage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1