Nonlinear Acceleration and Deceleration Response Behavior in Stimulus-Response Car-Following Models

Q3 Engineering Advances in Transportation Studies Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.4399/97888548663246
Saidi Siuhi, M. Kaseko
{"title":"Nonlinear Acceleration and Deceleration Response Behavior in Stimulus-Response Car-Following Models","authors":"Saidi Siuhi, M. Kaseko","doi":"10.4399/97888548663246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study developed a nonlinear family of car-following models that emulate driving behavior in congested freeway traffic conditions. The study developed separate sub-models for acceleration and deceleration responses. The study calibrated these models using individual vehicle trajectory data for \"automobile following automobile\" collected on a segment of Interstate 101 in Los Angeles, California. The study used nonlinear regression with robust standard errors to estimate the model parameters and to obtain their distributions across drivers. The stimulus response thresholds that delimited the acceleration and deceleration responses were determined based on Signal Detection Theory. The results indicated that the average driver's response time lag was lower for the deceleration response than for the acceleration response. This result was expected, since deceleration response is related to safety, therefore, drivers tend to respond faster than for acceleration response. The acceleration response is related to drivers' desire to attain maximum speed, which is a less critical need than deceleration response. Due to similar reasons, the results also showed that the average stimulus response threshold was lower for deceleration response than acceleration response. Furthermore, the deceleration response had higher magnitude of parameters than the acceleration response, which further indicated that, on the average, drivers were more aggressive when required to decelerate than when they wanted to accelerate. Additionally, drivers' response to negative stimuli is sometimes further aided by the activation of brake lights for a leading vehicle that is braking.","PeriodicalId":39032,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Transportation Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4399/97888548663246","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Transportation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4399/97888548663246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study developed a nonlinear family of car-following models that emulate driving behavior in congested freeway traffic conditions. The study developed separate sub-models for acceleration and deceleration responses. The study calibrated these models using individual vehicle trajectory data for "automobile following automobile" collected on a segment of Interstate 101 in Los Angeles, California. The study used nonlinear regression with robust standard errors to estimate the model parameters and to obtain their distributions across drivers. The stimulus response thresholds that delimited the acceleration and deceleration responses were determined based on Signal Detection Theory. The results indicated that the average driver's response time lag was lower for the deceleration response than for the acceleration response. This result was expected, since deceleration response is related to safety, therefore, drivers tend to respond faster than for acceleration response. The acceleration response is related to drivers' desire to attain maximum speed, which is a less critical need than deceleration response. Due to similar reasons, the results also showed that the average stimulus response threshold was lower for deceleration response than acceleration response. Furthermore, the deceleration response had higher magnitude of parameters than the acceleration response, which further indicated that, on the average, drivers were more aggressive when required to decelerate than when they wanted to accelerate. Additionally, drivers' response to negative stimuli is sometimes further aided by the activation of brake lights for a leading vehicle that is braking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刺激-响应汽车跟随模型的非线性加减速响应行为
本研究开发了一组非线性车辆跟随模型来模拟拥挤高速公路交通条件下的驾驶行为。该研究为加速和减速响应开发了单独的子模型。该研究使用在加州洛杉矶101号州际公路上收集的“一辆车跟着一辆车”的个别车辆轨迹数据来校准这些模型。本研究采用具有鲁棒标准误差的非线性回归估计模型参数,并得到模型参数在驾驶员间的分布。基于信号检测理论确定了划分加减速响应的刺激响应阈值。结果表明,驾驶员对减速响应的平均响应时间滞后小于对加速响应的平均响应时间滞后。这一结果是意料之中的,因为减速响应与安全有关,因此,驾驶员往往比加速响应更快。加速响应与驾驶员获得最大速度的愿望有关,这是一个不那么关键的需求,而不是减速响应。由于类似的原因,结果也表明减速响应的平均刺激反应阈值低于加速响应。此外,减速响应的参数量级高于加速响应,这进一步表明,平均而言,驾驶员在被要求减速时比在想要加速时更积极。此外,驾驶员对负面刺激的反应有时还会因前面正在刹车的车辆的刹车灯的激活而进一步增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Transportation Studies
Advances in Transportation Studies Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A methodology to identify critical road sections by means of cyclist's fatigue Exploring the impacts of intersection and traffic characteristics on the frequency and severity of bicycle-vehicle conflicts Estimating the Impact of Green Light Optimized Speed Advisory (Glosa) on Exhaust Emissions Through the Integration Ofvissim and Moves Drivers' self-reported reasons of speeding: a Turkish driver sample from two cities Applications of transit smart cards beyond a fare collection tool: a literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1