New Proposed Chronological Sequence and Dates of Composition of Esarhaddon's Babylon Inscriptions

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Cuneiform Studies Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.5615/jcunestud.67.2015.0145
Jamie R. Novotny
{"title":"New Proposed Chronological Sequence and Dates of Composition of Esarhaddon's Babylon Inscriptions","authors":"Jamie R. Novotny","doi":"10.5615/jcunestud.67.2015.0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Babylon Inscriptions of Esarhaddon, perhaps the best-known group of texts in the extant corpus this seventh-century Assyrian king, have for decades presented a real challenge in cracking the various levels of ideology imbedded in their contents, as well as the chronological order in which they were written. The latter issue is closely tied to the fact that several clay prisms inscribed with these texts are all dated by the formula šanat rēš šarrūti, “accession year.” This paper will argue that the intentional dating of the Babylon Inscriptions reflects historical reality and that Esarhaddon's did not deliberately falsify the dates of inscriptions. It will also closely examine the contents of the known texts in this small subcorpus of this Assyrian king's official inscriptions and suggest new dates of composition for each text (especially Babylon A and Babylon D), as well as a new chronological sequencing of the inscriptions. Lastly, this paper will present updated editions of Babylon G and Babylon F based on an old nonphysical join proposed by A. R. Millard and a new international join discovered by the author.","PeriodicalId":36366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","volume":"67 1","pages":"145 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5615/jcunestud.67.2015.0145","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5615/jcunestud.67.2015.0145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The Babylon Inscriptions of Esarhaddon, perhaps the best-known group of texts in the extant corpus this seventh-century Assyrian king, have for decades presented a real challenge in cracking the various levels of ideology imbedded in their contents, as well as the chronological order in which they were written. The latter issue is closely tied to the fact that several clay prisms inscribed with these texts are all dated by the formula šanat rēš šarrūti, “accession year.” This paper will argue that the intentional dating of the Babylon Inscriptions reflects historical reality and that Esarhaddon's did not deliberately falsify the dates of inscriptions. It will also closely examine the contents of the known texts in this small subcorpus of this Assyrian king's official inscriptions and suggest new dates of composition for each text (especially Babylon A and Babylon D), as well as a new chronological sequencing of the inscriptions. Lastly, this paper will present updated editions of Babylon G and Babylon F based on an old nonphysical join proposed by A. R. Millard and a new international join discovered by the author.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新提出的以撒哈顿巴比伦铭文的时间顺序和构成日期
以撒哈顿的巴比伦铭文,也许是现存的语料库中最著名的一组文本,在破解其内容中嵌入的不同层次的意识形态以及它们写作的时间顺序方面,几十年来一直是一个真正的挑战。后一个问题与以下事实密切相关:几个刻有这些文本的粘土棱镜的日期都是用公式šanat rēš šarrūti表示的,即“加入年份”。本文将论证巴比伦铭文的故意定年反映了历史现实,以撒哈顿并没有故意篡改铭文的日期。它还将仔细检查这个亚述国王官方铭文的小子语料库中已知文本的内容,并建议每个文本的新创作日期(特别是巴比伦A和巴比伦D),以及铭文的新时间顺序。最后,本文将基于a . R. Millard提出的旧的非物理连接和作者发现的新的国际连接,给出巴比伦G和巴比伦F的更新版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cuneiform Studies
Journal of Cuneiform Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Old Babylonian Date List with Year Names of Hammurabi A Kassite Exercise Tablet with Omens Concerning the “Yoke” of the Liver The Return of the Text: On Self-Reference in Cuneiform Literature Nebuchadnezzar II’s Palace Overseer (Ša Pān Ekalli) and The Canal of Abundance Building Projects Dur-Abi-ešuh and the Abandonment of Nippur During the Late Old Babylonian Period: A Historical Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1