Embracing New Realities: Professional Growth for New Principals and Mentors.

Donna Augustine-Shaw, J. Liang
{"title":"Embracing New Realities: Professional Growth for New Principals and Mentors.","authors":"Donna Augustine-Shaw, J. Liang","doi":"10.4148/0146-9282.1016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper highlights one state model providing mentoring and induction for new school leaders in the U.S.A. The importance of mentoring and induction as a continuation of leadership preparation is highlighted in program components and participant perceptions in The Kansas Educational Leadership Institute’s (KELI) mentoring and induction program and professional learning seminars. Experienced and trained mentors provide critical support for new principals serving schools and communities in their first year of practice. A program description, initial operational processes, program requirements, and mentor training are shared along with information about KELI’s second year program, evaluation results, and next steps. Introduction When a new principal is appointed, school staff and community members share common feelings of anxiety, curiosity, and excitement (Villani 2006). Likewise, the new principal may be eager, yet uncertain, and in reality, often face complex demands very early in the job. New principals encounter particular challenges moving between and prioritizing the many tasks at hand. Staff resignations, unfinished construction, lack of essential classroom resources, and technology challenges can exacerbate the first few months of the position. “In the principalship there can be a ripple effect from almost any decision” (Sciarappa and Mason 2012, 65). Regardless of prior experience and leadership preparation, new principals face situations for which they lack experience (Villani 2006). Mentoring and induction programs allow novice principals to learn new skills and increase understanding of multifaceted problems. Support from mentors grounded in knowledge of research, best practice, and current issues can make a decisive difference in the first year of practice where intense learning occurs. Having someone to share issues Dr. Donna Augustine-Shaw is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Educational Leadership at Kansas State University (U.S.A.). She also serves as the Associate Director for the Kansas Educational Leadership Institute. Her research interests include the superintendency and mentoring and induction for new leaders. Dr. Jia Liang is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Educational Leadership at Kansas State University (U.S.A.). Her research interests include school leadership, equity for women and racial minorities, and leaders’ dispositions and practices in community engagement. She holds a PhD from the University of Georgia in Educational Administration and Policy. 1 Augustine-Shaw and Liang: Embracing New Realities: Professional Growth for New Principals a Published by New Prairie Press, 2017 11 Educational Considerations and concerns in a confidential setting is paramount to the new principal. In addition, mentors encourage self-reflection and on-going professional growth through their dedication and time, moving beyond being simply a “buddy” (Villani 2006). New leaders must gain the knowledge and skills necessary for survival during their first year on the job. The training for novice principal leaders often begins anew as a first leadership position is acquired. On-the-job training often supersedes these first year leadership experiences as new building leaders take the helm and undertake challenging circumstances. Principals need high quality mentoring and professional development in their first year of experience accompanied by contextually specific strategies in order to understand the values and serve the school community. As they encounter moving beyond their preparation program to the reality of actual practice, stress abounds from efforts to acquire new skills, stakeholder demands, long hours and fast-paced expectations, supervision of staff, and isolation (Holloway 2004). Successful programs succinctly identify several variables important to the success of mentoring and induction programs for new school leaders. Crocker and Harris (2002) cited new principal mentees need time and ongoing opportunities to share with experienced mentors. A thoughtful selection process that matches the mentor and mentee according to school and staff characteristics is paramount to promoting trusting and confidential relationships. Other essentials include thoughtful guidelines for mentors to assist in shaping meaningful experiences during mentor/mentee interactions and training for mentors centered on building relationships and collaborative leadership behaviors. Dukess (2001) validated that quality mentor programs must include clear guidelines for both mentor and mentee and non-evaluative dialogue as key to a successful mentoring program. Mentor training aimed at enhancement of coach-like skills in listening and questioning helps mentors to facilitate clear and productive inquiries that better solicit critical thinking and reflection from their mentees (Mendels 2012). Through incorporating continuous professional development targeted at understanding local contexts and embedded, responsive activities, mentoring programs strengthen leadership capacity and increase success during the first few years. Killion (2012, 26) stated, “Balancing multiple priorities is a typical challenge principals face, and in this era of so many significant changes, principals are feeling more overwhelmed than ever.” Furthermore, Killion shared that principals lack guidance on effective approaches to build coherence and implement multiple change initiatives simultaneously. An experienced principal mentor is a critical link for new school leaders as they bridge theory to practice and apply acquired knowledge and individual beliefs to daily performance and decision-making that positively impacts the school environment. The Kansas Educational Leadership Institute In an effort to address a clear need to support new principal leaders in Kansas, the Kansas Educational Leadership Institute (KELI) moved forward from a committed planning process in 2012 to implement mentoring and induction for principals new to the position in 2013. This process was led by a statewide Building Leader Mentoring and Induction Task Force. The work of the task force resulted in a recommendation outlining research-based and best practice mentoring and induction requirements for new building leaders. This work built on and expanded from KELI’s initial mentoring and induction program to serve new superintendent leaders in Kansas in 2011. KELI is a shared partnership between Kansas State University College of Education (KSU COE), Kansas State Department of Education (KSDE), Kansas Association of School Boards (KASB), United School Administrators of Kansas (USA-Kansas), and Kansas School Superintendent’s Association (KSSA). KELI’s mission is to collaborate and share resources to support professional growth of educational leaders needed in Kansas schools for the 21st Century. Along with a priority focus on mentoring and induction new school and district leaders, KELI provides a second strand of support for all leaders in Kansas through deep learning opportunities designed to support Kansas leaders in the 21st century. High collaboration among KELI’s partners enables meaningful contributions and a continued focus on best practice, responsive planning to meet the needs in today’s schools and districts, and research-based program requirements. KELI’s dual emphasis on quality mentoring and induction and ongoing opportunities for professional learning for all Kansas leaders exemplifies a well-structured and well-received program of support for Kansas leaders. KELI is recognized by KSDE as an area professional learning center. This status allows new superintendents and principals and other initially licensed leaders in Kansas to move to their professional license when mentoring and induction program requirements are completed. Trained and experienced field mentors set out to embrace exciting leadership work and service by providing individualized and on-site support in each local district. National leadership standards are applied in meaningful context by KELI mentors as they contribute to insightful discussions and reflective feedback at each mentor/mentee visit (CCSSO 2008). KELI’s second strand of leadership development for all Kansas leaders provides quality professional development focused on current topics. This strand of leadership development seminars are designed to target specific needs of the leader’s role in tackling many state and federal initiatives inherent in today’s school and district settings. Moving the Principal Mentoring and Induction Program into Action May 2013 marked the first steps in forming a pilot mentoring and induction program for first year principals in Kansas based on the work of the Building Leader Mentoring and Induction task force. KELI partner leaders collectively announced this new state opportunity for building level 2 Educational Considerations, Vol. 43, No. 3 [2016], Art. 4 http://newprairiepress.org/edconsiderations/vol43/iss3/4 DOI: 10.4148/0146-9282.1016 12 Vol. 43, No. 3, Summer 2016 leadership support. These partner leaders included the Commissioner of Education (KSDE), KSU COE Dean, Executive Directors of KASB and USA-Kansas, and President of KSSA. The work moved quickly into action. Preparation for requesting volunteer districts with first year principals and experienced Kansas principal mentors began in May 2013. Superintendents received email communication through KSDE listservs regarding the opportunity for voluntary participation for both new principal mentees as well as nomination requests for veteran principal mentors. Basic program descriptions provided superintendents with information about each opportunity and role as well as contact information to express interest in pilot program participation. During the summer months, extensive planning by KELI staff prepared for program implementation in August. Additional contact initiated by KELI staff with district superintendents and prospective me","PeriodicalId":33941,"journal":{"name":"Educational Considerations","volume":"43 1","pages":"10-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Considerations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.1016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper highlights one state model providing mentoring and induction for new school leaders in the U.S.A. The importance of mentoring and induction as a continuation of leadership preparation is highlighted in program components and participant perceptions in The Kansas Educational Leadership Institute’s (KELI) mentoring and induction program and professional learning seminars. Experienced and trained mentors provide critical support for new principals serving schools and communities in their first year of practice. A program description, initial operational processes, program requirements, and mentor training are shared along with information about KELI’s second year program, evaluation results, and next steps. Introduction When a new principal is appointed, school staff and community members share common feelings of anxiety, curiosity, and excitement (Villani 2006). Likewise, the new principal may be eager, yet uncertain, and in reality, often face complex demands very early in the job. New principals encounter particular challenges moving between and prioritizing the many tasks at hand. Staff resignations, unfinished construction, lack of essential classroom resources, and technology challenges can exacerbate the first few months of the position. “In the principalship there can be a ripple effect from almost any decision” (Sciarappa and Mason 2012, 65). Regardless of prior experience and leadership preparation, new principals face situations for which they lack experience (Villani 2006). Mentoring and induction programs allow novice principals to learn new skills and increase understanding of multifaceted problems. Support from mentors grounded in knowledge of research, best practice, and current issues can make a decisive difference in the first year of practice where intense learning occurs. Having someone to share issues Dr. Donna Augustine-Shaw is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Educational Leadership at Kansas State University (U.S.A.). She also serves as the Associate Director for the Kansas Educational Leadership Institute. Her research interests include the superintendency and mentoring and induction for new leaders. Dr. Jia Liang is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Educational Leadership at Kansas State University (U.S.A.). Her research interests include school leadership, equity for women and racial minorities, and leaders’ dispositions and practices in community engagement. She holds a PhD from the University of Georgia in Educational Administration and Policy. 1 Augustine-Shaw and Liang: Embracing New Realities: Professional Growth for New Principals a Published by New Prairie Press, 2017 11 Educational Considerations and concerns in a confidential setting is paramount to the new principal. In addition, mentors encourage self-reflection and on-going professional growth through their dedication and time, moving beyond being simply a “buddy” (Villani 2006). New leaders must gain the knowledge and skills necessary for survival during their first year on the job. The training for novice principal leaders often begins anew as a first leadership position is acquired. On-the-job training often supersedes these first year leadership experiences as new building leaders take the helm and undertake challenging circumstances. Principals need high quality mentoring and professional development in their first year of experience accompanied by contextually specific strategies in order to understand the values and serve the school community. As they encounter moving beyond their preparation program to the reality of actual practice, stress abounds from efforts to acquire new skills, stakeholder demands, long hours and fast-paced expectations, supervision of staff, and isolation (Holloway 2004). Successful programs succinctly identify several variables important to the success of mentoring and induction programs for new school leaders. Crocker and Harris (2002) cited new principal mentees need time and ongoing opportunities to share with experienced mentors. A thoughtful selection process that matches the mentor and mentee according to school and staff characteristics is paramount to promoting trusting and confidential relationships. Other essentials include thoughtful guidelines for mentors to assist in shaping meaningful experiences during mentor/mentee interactions and training for mentors centered on building relationships and collaborative leadership behaviors. Dukess (2001) validated that quality mentor programs must include clear guidelines for both mentor and mentee and non-evaluative dialogue as key to a successful mentoring program. Mentor training aimed at enhancement of coach-like skills in listening and questioning helps mentors to facilitate clear and productive inquiries that better solicit critical thinking and reflection from their mentees (Mendels 2012). Through incorporating continuous professional development targeted at understanding local contexts and embedded, responsive activities, mentoring programs strengthen leadership capacity and increase success during the first few years. Killion (2012, 26) stated, “Balancing multiple priorities is a typical challenge principals face, and in this era of so many significant changes, principals are feeling more overwhelmed than ever.” Furthermore, Killion shared that principals lack guidance on effective approaches to build coherence and implement multiple change initiatives simultaneously. An experienced principal mentor is a critical link for new school leaders as they bridge theory to practice and apply acquired knowledge and individual beliefs to daily performance and decision-making that positively impacts the school environment. The Kansas Educational Leadership Institute In an effort to address a clear need to support new principal leaders in Kansas, the Kansas Educational Leadership Institute (KELI) moved forward from a committed planning process in 2012 to implement mentoring and induction for principals new to the position in 2013. This process was led by a statewide Building Leader Mentoring and Induction Task Force. The work of the task force resulted in a recommendation outlining research-based and best practice mentoring and induction requirements for new building leaders. This work built on and expanded from KELI’s initial mentoring and induction program to serve new superintendent leaders in Kansas in 2011. KELI is a shared partnership between Kansas State University College of Education (KSU COE), Kansas State Department of Education (KSDE), Kansas Association of School Boards (KASB), United School Administrators of Kansas (USA-Kansas), and Kansas School Superintendent’s Association (KSSA). KELI’s mission is to collaborate and share resources to support professional growth of educational leaders needed in Kansas schools for the 21st Century. Along with a priority focus on mentoring and induction new school and district leaders, KELI provides a second strand of support for all leaders in Kansas through deep learning opportunities designed to support Kansas leaders in the 21st century. High collaboration among KELI’s partners enables meaningful contributions and a continued focus on best practice, responsive planning to meet the needs in today’s schools and districts, and research-based program requirements. KELI’s dual emphasis on quality mentoring and induction and ongoing opportunities for professional learning for all Kansas leaders exemplifies a well-structured and well-received program of support for Kansas leaders. KELI is recognized by KSDE as an area professional learning center. This status allows new superintendents and principals and other initially licensed leaders in Kansas to move to their professional license when mentoring and induction program requirements are completed. Trained and experienced field mentors set out to embrace exciting leadership work and service by providing individualized and on-site support in each local district. National leadership standards are applied in meaningful context by KELI mentors as they contribute to insightful discussions and reflective feedback at each mentor/mentee visit (CCSSO 2008). KELI’s second strand of leadership development for all Kansas leaders provides quality professional development focused on current topics. This strand of leadership development seminars are designed to target specific needs of the leader’s role in tackling many state and federal initiatives inherent in today’s school and district settings. Moving the Principal Mentoring and Induction Program into Action May 2013 marked the first steps in forming a pilot mentoring and induction program for first year principals in Kansas based on the work of the Building Leader Mentoring and Induction task force. KELI partner leaders collectively announced this new state opportunity for building level 2 Educational Considerations, Vol. 43, No. 3 [2016], Art. 4 http://newprairiepress.org/edconsiderations/vol43/iss3/4 DOI: 10.4148/0146-9282.1016 12 Vol. 43, No. 3, Summer 2016 leadership support. These partner leaders included the Commissioner of Education (KSDE), KSU COE Dean, Executive Directors of KASB and USA-Kansas, and President of KSSA. The work moved quickly into action. Preparation for requesting volunteer districts with first year principals and experienced Kansas principal mentors began in May 2013. Superintendents received email communication through KSDE listservs regarding the opportunity for voluntary participation for both new principal mentees as well as nomination requests for veteran principal mentors. Basic program descriptions provided superintendents with information about each opportunity and role as well as contact information to express interest in pilot program participation. During the summer months, extensive planning by KELI staff prepared for program implementation in August. Additional contact initiated by KELI staff with district superintendents and prospective me
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拥抱新的现实:新校长和导师的专业成长。
在堪萨斯教育领导研究所(KELI)的指导和引导计划和专业学习研讨会中,指导和引导作为领导准备的延续的重要性在计划组成部分和参与者的看法中得到了强调。经验丰富和训练有素的导师为新校长在第一年的实践中为学校和社区服务提供关键支持。项目描述、初始操作流程、项目要求和导师培训,以及KELI第二年项目、评估结果和下一步的信息都被分享。当一位新校长被任命时,学校员工和社区成员都有焦虑、好奇和兴奋的共同感受(Villani 2006)。同样,新校长可能很急切,但不确定,而且实际上,在工作的早期,经常面临复杂的要求。新的主体遇到了特殊的挑战,在许多任务之间移动并确定优先级。员工辞职,未完成的建设,缺乏必要的教室资源,以及技术挑战会加剧这个职位的头几个月。“在领导关系中,几乎任何决定都会产生连锁反应”(Sciarappa and Mason 2012, 65)。不管以前的经验和领导准备,新校长面临的情况,他们缺乏经验(维拉尼2006)。指导和诱导项目让新校长学习新技能,增加对多方面问题的理解。来自研究知识、最佳实践和当前问题的导师的支持可以在第一年的密集学习中产生决定性的影响。唐娜·奥古斯丁·肖博士是美国堪萨斯州立大学教育领导系的助理教授。她还担任堪萨斯教育领导研究所的副主任。她的研究兴趣包括新领导的监督、指导和诱导。梁佳博士是美国堪萨斯州立大学教育领导学系助理教授。她的研究兴趣包括学校领导,妇女和少数民族的平等,以及领导人在社区参与中的性格和实践。1奥古斯丁·肖和梁:拥抱新的现实:新校长的专业成长,新草原出版社出版,2017年11在保密环境下的教育考虑和关注对新校长至关重要。此外,导师通过他们的奉献和时间鼓励自我反思和持续的专业成长,而不仅仅是一个“伙伴”(Villani 2006)。新领导人必须在上任的第一年获得生存所必需的知识和技能。新校长的培训通常在获得第一个领导职位后重新开始。在职培训通常会取代这些第一年的领导经验,因为新的建筑领导者会掌舵并承担具有挑战性的环境。校长在第一年的工作经验中需要高质量的指导和专业发展,并伴随着具体的环境策略,以理解学校的价值观并为学校社区服务。当他们遇到从准备计划到实际实践的现实时,压力来自获得新技能的努力,利益相关者的要求,长时间和快节奏的期望,员工的监督和孤立(Holloway 2004)。成功的项目简洁地确定了几个变量,这些变量对新学校领导的指导和诱导项目的成功至关重要。克罗克和哈里斯(2002)指出,新的主要学员需要时间和持续的机会与经验丰富的导师分享。一个经过深思熟虑的选择过程,根据学校和员工的特点匹配导师和学员,对于促进信任和保密关系至关重要。其他要点包括为导师提供周到的指导,帮助他们在导师/被指导者互动过程中形成有意义的经验,并为导师提供以建立关系和协作领导行为为中心的培训。Dukess(2001)证实,高质量的导师项目必须包括导师和学员的明确指导方针,以及非评估性对话,这是成功的导师项目的关键。导师培训旨在提高倾听和提问方面的教练式技能,帮助导师促进清晰和富有成效的询问,从而更好地征求学员的批判性思考和反思(孟德尔,2012)。 通过结合以了解当地情况为目标的持续专业发展和嵌入式响应活动,指导计划在最初几年加强了领导能力并增加了成功。Killion(2012, 26)指出:“平衡多重优先事项是校长面临的一个典型挑战,在这个变化如此之多的时代,校长们比以往任何时候都感到不知所措。”此外,Killion还表示,校长缺乏有效方法的指导,无法同时建立一致性和实施多个变革计划。经验丰富的校长导师是新学校领导的关键纽带,因为他们将理论与实践联系起来,并将获得的知识和个人信念应用于日常表现和决策,从而对学校环境产生积极影响。为了满足支持堪萨斯州新校长领导的明确需求,堪萨斯州教育领导研究所(KELI)从2012年的承诺规划过程中向前推进,在2013年对新校长实施指导和诱导。这个过程是由一个全州范围的建筑领导者指导和诱导工作组领导的。工作组的工作产生了一项建议,概述了新大楼领导的研究基础和最佳实践指导和入职要求。这项工作是在KELI最初的指导和入门计划的基础上扩展的,该计划于2011年为堪萨斯州的新负责人提供服务。KELI是堪萨斯州立大学教育学院(KSU COE)、堪萨斯州教育部(KSDE)、堪萨斯州学校董事会协会(KASB)、堪萨斯州联合学校管理人员(USA-Kansas)和堪萨斯州学校监督协会(KSSA)之间的共同合作伙伴关系。KELI的使命是合作和共享资源,以支持21世纪堪萨斯州学校所需的教育领导者的专业成长。除了优先关注指导和引导新的学校和地区领导人外,KELI还通过深度学习机会为堪萨斯州的所有领导人提供第二股支持,旨在支持21世纪的堪萨斯州领导人。KELI的合作伙伴之间的高度合作,使有意义的贡献和持续关注最佳实践,响应性规划,以满足当今学校和地区的需求,以及基于研究的项目要求。KELI的双重重点是高质量的指导和诱导,以及为堪萨斯州所有领导人提供持续的专业学习机会,这是一个为堪萨斯州领导人提供结构良好、广受欢迎的支持计划的典范。KELI是KSDE认可的区域专业学习中心。这种状态允许新的主管和校长以及堪萨斯州其他最初获得许可的领导者在完成指导和入职计划要求后获得他们的专业执照。训练有素和经验丰富的实地导师开始接受令人兴奋的领导工作和服务,在每个地区提供个性化和现场支持。KELI导师将国家领导标准应用于有意义的环境中,因为它们有助于在每次导师/学员访问中进行深刻的讨论和反思反馈(CCSSO 2008)。KELI的第二股领导力发展为所有堪萨斯州的领导人提供了高质量的专业发展,专注于当前的主题。这一系列领导力发展研讨会旨在针对领导者在解决当今学校和地区环境中许多州和联邦倡议中所扮演的角色的特定需求。2013年5月,基于建筑领导者指导和引导工作小组的工作,堪萨斯州一年级校长试点指导和引导项目迈出了第一步。KELI合作伙伴领导人集体宣布了建立2级教育考虑的新国家机会,第43卷,第3期[2016],第4条http://newprairiepress.org/edconsiderations/vol43/iss3/4 DOI: 10.4148/0146-9282.1016 12卷,第3期,2016年夏季领导支持。这些合作伙伴领导人包括教育专员(KSDE), KSU COE院长,KASB和USA-Kansas的执行董事以及KSSA的总裁。这项工作很快付诸实施。2013年5月,由一年级校长和经验丰富的堪萨斯校长导师为申请志愿者地区做准备。校长们通过KSDE的邮件列表收到了关于新校长导师自愿参与的机会以及老校长导师的提名请求的电子邮件。基本的项目描述为管理者提供了关于每个机会和角色的信息,以及表达对试点项目参与兴趣的联系信息。 在夏季的几个月里,KELI的工作人员进行了广泛的规划,为8月份的项目实施做准备。KELI工作人员与地区负责人和未来的我进行了额外的接触
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Content Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles Over the Last 20 Years: To What Extent Does Contemporary Research Focus on the Effects of Frequent Relocation on the Academic Performance of Military-Connected Students? Impact of the Reggio Emilia Approach through short term study abroad and the lenses of Lundy's model: Space, voice, audience, and influence Strategies for Improving Teachers’ Professional Development in Higher Education Institutions in the Southwest Region of Cameroon African Indigenous Epistemologies, Traditions, and Practices Before the Arrival of Europeans Fostering Internationalization in Adult Education Graduate Programs in the United States: Opportunities for Growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1