LithoVue™: A new single-use digital flexible ureteroscope

S. Butticè, T. E. Şener, C. Netsch, E. Emiliani, R. Pappalardo, C. Magno
{"title":"LithoVue™: A new single-use digital flexible ureteroscope","authors":"S. Butticè, T. E. Şener, C. Netsch, E. Emiliani, R. Pappalardo, C. Magno","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2016.872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last 20 years new technologies have emerged in urology, while there has been an increase in the incidence of kidney stone disease with growing use of flexible ureteroscopy [1]. In 2004 Gyrus ACMI introduced the first totally digital flexible ureteroscopic system, the DUR-D Invisio platform [2]. This was a watershed moment as all the major companies began producing digital flexible ureteroscopes from that moment forward with an improved armamentarium available for the urologist [3]. In October 2015 Boston Scientific introduced the LithoVue™. This is the first single-use flexible ureteroscope developed to access the upper urinary tract. \n \nThe LithoVue™ \nThe LithoVue™ (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) is a new single-use digital flexible ureteroscope (Figure 1). \n \n \n \nFigure 1 \n \nThe new single use flexible ureteroscope: LithoVue™. A. The LithoVue™ external aspect in the hands of the surgeon and the LithoVue™ monitor can be seen at the back. B. Maximum deflection of the ureteroscope tip; 270° in ... \n \n \n \nThe handle is extremely ergonomic, permitting the user to easily perfom the 6 principal movements in a natural way (deflection: up/down, supination/pronation, forward/backward). The deflection system has both options of standart and the reverse modes with a maximum deflection of 270˚ in both directions (Figures 1 & 2). The outer diameter is 9.5 Fr (≤3.23 mm) and the tip diameter is 7.7 Fr (Figures 1 & 2). These diameters allow endourologists to work with all of the ureteral access sheaths currently on the market. \n \n \n \nFigure 2 \n \nExternal view of the LithoVue™. A. The tip at maximum deflection. B. External view of the device with the tip straight. C. External view of the device with the tip at maximum deflection. \n \n \n \nThe working channel width measures 3.6 Fr and allows the introduction of various endoscopic instruments such as laser fibers, baskets and different kinds of graspers (Figure 3). \n \n \n \nFigure 3 \n \nEndoscopic view from the LithoVue™ demonstrating the digital image quality during upper urinary tract endoscopy. A. Kidney stone inside the caliceal system. B. Kidney stone and a green coated 272 μm laser fiber. \n \n \n \nIn order to maximize the vision it has a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) imager system with a working distance of 2–50 mm (Figures 3 & 4). \n \n \n \nFigure 4 \n \nEndoscopic view from the LithoVue™ demonstrating the digital image quality during upper urinary tract endoscopy. A stenotic infundibulum and a small stone fragment can be seen. \n \n \n \nThe LithoVue™ possesses chip-on-the-tip technology as the camera and light source are fully integrated in the scope, and it has a workstation monitor with the integrated image processing software mounted on a compact, rolling mobile cart. It is possible to use the LithoVue™ system alone or to connect it to the operating room’s existing DVI monitors and recording systems (Figure 5). \n \n \n \nFigure 5 \n \nMonitor station of the LithoVue™ at Tenon University Hospital. \n \n \n \n \n \nDISCUSSION \nDifferent flexible ureteroscopes are on the market, including fiberoptic and digital versions. The latter offer better vision quality, though in their study comparing digital versus fiber-optic scopes, Somani et al. found the only advantage of the digital scope in cases of stone treatment was the decrease in operative time by 20% [4]. It is important to note that the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines state the importance of using the technological advancements in the treatment of upper urinary tract tumors [5]. \n \nHowever, the increasing improvement of ureteroscopes has led to several problems. The principal issue is durability and depends on many factors such as a surgeon’s experience and skills, time of use, and the use of other devices or instruments. Another important, open question is the sterilisation factor when considering scope damage. Abraham et al. demonstrated that two identical fiberoptic scopes underwent two different sterilisation processes (Steris 1™ and Cidex OPA) after 100 cycles. The first one, which was sterilised in the Steris system, had a 12-mm tear on its shaft, 297 damaged fibers, and a 37% drop in resolution. The second, sterilised with Cidex, had only 10 damaged fibers and no visible external damage [6]. \n \nThe durability of flexible ureteroscopes has been a concern for many years. Refurbished flexible ureteroscopes have been reported to be very fragile after undergoing comprehensive repair, especially if they are used by multiple surgeons and this situation leads to significant maintenance, repair, and administrative costs [7]. Actually, there are studies showing some advancements of ureteroscope durability with repeated uses of up to 107.7 hours with a single ureteroscope, but still the latest data is telling us that the durability of flexible ureteroscopes needs to be improved [8]. Additionally it should be kept in mind that, with LithoVue™, the performance of a brand-new endoscope is experienced in each procedure, bypassing the loss of deflection with repeated use. \n \nWhen cost-effectiveness is evaluated, the reusable flexible ureteroscopes are burdened with purchase, repair, and service costs in addition to cleaning, disinfection and sterilization costs as well as costs related to health care and time consumption. However, single-use flexible ureteroscopes bring with them purchase and storage costs of the scopes themselves and their corresponding work stations as well as costs related to waste handling. Ureteroscopes represent semicritical devices due to their contact with patients’ mucous membranes and must be sterilized with high-level disinfectants. Failure to properly disinfect the scopes can lead to transmission of infection [9]. The working channel of the ureteroscopes must be actively perfused with high-level disinfectants otherwise disinfection does not occur [9]. These steps are also acknowledged by the American Urological Association and failure to comply can result in urinary tract infections [10]. This process constitutes one of the major steps that accounts for the high expenditure of re-usable scopes. It should also be emphasized that the price of the LithoVue™ should be discussed with the local company in each country because the costs may change according to different purchasing options as well as different countries. \n \nAll of these problems can be avoided by using the LithoVue™, which guarantees performance equal to that of new reusable ureteroscopes but without the risk of possible contamination. \n \nThe optical characteristics of the LithoVue™, the Flex-Xc (Karl Storz, Germany) and the Cobra (Richard Wolf, Germany) were compared by Kaplan et al. who concluded that the LithoVue™ has superb optical capabilities, deflection and flow, thus making it a viable alternative to standard non-disposable 4th generation flexible digital and fiberoptic ureteroscopes [11]. Furthermore, in their study on fresh cadavers, Proietti et al. compared the LithoVue™ with other ureteroscopes and demonstrated that the vision and handling are comparable to other ureteroscopes. LithoVue™ was preferred in all of the renal units used in these experiments due to its maneuverability [12].","PeriodicalId":86295,"journal":{"name":"Urologia polska","volume":"69 1","pages":"302 - 305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5173/ceju.2016.872","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Over the last 20 years new technologies have emerged in urology, while there has been an increase in the incidence of kidney stone disease with growing use of flexible ureteroscopy [1]. In 2004 Gyrus ACMI introduced the first totally digital flexible ureteroscopic system, the DUR-D Invisio platform [2]. This was a watershed moment as all the major companies began producing digital flexible ureteroscopes from that moment forward with an improved armamentarium available for the urologist [3]. In October 2015 Boston Scientific introduced the LithoVue™. This is the first single-use flexible ureteroscope developed to access the upper urinary tract. The LithoVue™ The LithoVue™ (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) is a new single-use digital flexible ureteroscope (Figure 1). Figure 1 The new single use flexible ureteroscope: LithoVue™. A. The LithoVue™ external aspect in the hands of the surgeon and the LithoVue™ monitor can be seen at the back. B. Maximum deflection of the ureteroscope tip; 270° in ... The handle is extremely ergonomic, permitting the user to easily perfom the 6 principal movements in a natural way (deflection: up/down, supination/pronation, forward/backward). The deflection system has both options of standart and the reverse modes with a maximum deflection of 270˚ in both directions (Figures 1 & 2). The outer diameter is 9.5 Fr (≤3.23 mm) and the tip diameter is 7.7 Fr (Figures 1 & 2). These diameters allow endourologists to work with all of the ureteral access sheaths currently on the market. Figure 2 External view of the LithoVue™. A. The tip at maximum deflection. B. External view of the device with the tip straight. C. External view of the device with the tip at maximum deflection. The working channel width measures 3.6 Fr and allows the introduction of various endoscopic instruments such as laser fibers, baskets and different kinds of graspers (Figure 3). Figure 3 Endoscopic view from the LithoVue™ demonstrating the digital image quality during upper urinary tract endoscopy. A. Kidney stone inside the caliceal system. B. Kidney stone and a green coated 272 μm laser fiber. In order to maximize the vision it has a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) imager system with a working distance of 2–50 mm (Figures 3 & 4). Figure 4 Endoscopic view from the LithoVue™ demonstrating the digital image quality during upper urinary tract endoscopy. A stenotic infundibulum and a small stone fragment can be seen. The LithoVue™ possesses chip-on-the-tip technology as the camera and light source are fully integrated in the scope, and it has a workstation monitor with the integrated image processing software mounted on a compact, rolling mobile cart. It is possible to use the LithoVue™ system alone or to connect it to the operating room’s existing DVI monitors and recording systems (Figure 5). Figure 5 Monitor station of the LithoVue™ at Tenon University Hospital. DISCUSSION Different flexible ureteroscopes are on the market, including fiberoptic and digital versions. The latter offer better vision quality, though in their study comparing digital versus fiber-optic scopes, Somani et al. found the only advantage of the digital scope in cases of stone treatment was the decrease in operative time by 20% [4]. It is important to note that the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines state the importance of using the technological advancements in the treatment of upper urinary tract tumors [5]. However, the increasing improvement of ureteroscopes has led to several problems. The principal issue is durability and depends on many factors such as a surgeon’s experience and skills, time of use, and the use of other devices or instruments. Another important, open question is the sterilisation factor when considering scope damage. Abraham et al. demonstrated that two identical fiberoptic scopes underwent two different sterilisation processes (Steris 1™ and Cidex OPA) after 100 cycles. The first one, which was sterilised in the Steris system, had a 12-mm tear on its shaft, 297 damaged fibers, and a 37% drop in resolution. The second, sterilised with Cidex, had only 10 damaged fibers and no visible external damage [6]. The durability of flexible ureteroscopes has been a concern for many years. Refurbished flexible ureteroscopes have been reported to be very fragile after undergoing comprehensive repair, especially if they are used by multiple surgeons and this situation leads to significant maintenance, repair, and administrative costs [7]. Actually, there are studies showing some advancements of ureteroscope durability with repeated uses of up to 107.7 hours with a single ureteroscope, but still the latest data is telling us that the durability of flexible ureteroscopes needs to be improved [8]. Additionally it should be kept in mind that, with LithoVue™, the performance of a brand-new endoscope is experienced in each procedure, bypassing the loss of deflection with repeated use. When cost-effectiveness is evaluated, the reusable flexible ureteroscopes are burdened with purchase, repair, and service costs in addition to cleaning, disinfection and sterilization costs as well as costs related to health care and time consumption. However, single-use flexible ureteroscopes bring with them purchase and storage costs of the scopes themselves and their corresponding work stations as well as costs related to waste handling. Ureteroscopes represent semicritical devices due to their contact with patients’ mucous membranes and must be sterilized with high-level disinfectants. Failure to properly disinfect the scopes can lead to transmission of infection [9]. The working channel of the ureteroscopes must be actively perfused with high-level disinfectants otherwise disinfection does not occur [9]. These steps are also acknowledged by the American Urological Association and failure to comply can result in urinary tract infections [10]. This process constitutes one of the major steps that accounts for the high expenditure of re-usable scopes. It should also be emphasized that the price of the LithoVue™ should be discussed with the local company in each country because the costs may change according to different purchasing options as well as different countries. All of these problems can be avoided by using the LithoVue™, which guarantees performance equal to that of new reusable ureteroscopes but without the risk of possible contamination. The optical characteristics of the LithoVue™, the Flex-Xc (Karl Storz, Germany) and the Cobra (Richard Wolf, Germany) were compared by Kaplan et al. who concluded that the LithoVue™ has superb optical capabilities, deflection and flow, thus making it a viable alternative to standard non-disposable 4th generation flexible digital and fiberoptic ureteroscopes [11]. Furthermore, in their study on fresh cadavers, Proietti et al. compared the LithoVue™ with other ureteroscopes and demonstrated that the vision and handling are comparable to other ureteroscopes. LithoVue™ was preferred in all of the renal units used in these experiments due to its maneuverability [12].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LithoVue™:一种新型的一次性数字柔性输尿管镜
在过去的20年里,泌尿外科出现了新的技术,同时随着输尿管镜术的使用越来越多,肾结石的发病率也在增加。2004年,Gyrus ACMI推出了第一个完全数字化的柔性输尿管镜系统,durd Invisio平台[2]。这是一个分水岭,从那时起,所有的大公司都开始生产数字柔性输尿管镜,为泌尿科医生提供了改进的设备。2015年10月,波士顿科学公司推出了LithoVue™。这是第一个用于上尿路的一次性柔性输尿管镜。LithoVue™(Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA)是一种新型一次性数字柔性输尿管镜(图1)。图1新型一次性柔性输尿管镜:LithoVue™。A.外科医生手中的LithoVue™外侧面和背后的LithoVue™监视器可以看到。B.输尿管镜尖端最大偏转;270°in…手柄非常符合人体工程学,允许用户轻松地以自然的方式执行6个主要动作(偏转:上/下,旋/内旋,向前/向后)。偏转系统有标准和反向两种模式可选,两个方向的最大偏转度为270˚(图1和2)。外径为9.5 Fr(≤3.23 mm),尖端直径为7.7 Fr(图1和2)。这些直径允许腔内科医生使用目前市场上所有的输尿管导管套。图2 LithoVue™的外部视图。A.最大挠度的尖端。B.设备尖端直的外部视图。C.设备顶部最大挠度的外部视图。工作通道宽度为3.6 Fr,允许引入各种内窥镜仪器,如激光光纤,筐和不同种类的抓取器(图3)。图3来自LithoVue™的内窥镜视图展示了上尿路内窥镜检查期间的数字图像质量。A.肾盏系统内肾结石。B.肾结石和绿色涂层272 μm激光光纤。为了最大限度地提高视力,它有一个互补的金属氧化物半导体(CMOS)成像系统,工作距离为2-50毫米(图3和4)。图4来自LithoVue™的内窥镜视图显示了上尿路内窥镜检查期间的数字图像质量。可见狭窄的漏斗和一小块结石碎片。LithoVue™采用尖端芯片技术,因为相机和光源完全集成在瞄准镜中,并且它有一个工作站监视器,集成了图像处理软件,安装在紧凑的滚动移动推车上。可以单独使用LithoVue™系统,也可以将其连接到手术室现有的DVI监视器和记录系统(图5)。图5 Tenon大学医院的LithoVue™监控站。市场上有不同的柔性输尿管镜,包括光纤输尿管镜和数字输尿管镜。后者提供更好的视觉质量,尽管在比较数字镜与光纤镜的研究中,Somani等人发现数字镜在结石治疗中唯一的优势是手术时间减少了20%。值得注意的是,欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)指南指出了利用技术进步治疗上尿路肿瘤的重要性。然而,输尿管镜的不断改进也带来了一些问题。主要问题是耐用性,这取决于许多因素,如外科医生的经验和技能,使用时间,以及使用其他设备或仪器。另一个重要的、悬而未决的问题是考虑瞄准镜损坏时的灭菌因素。Abraham等人证明了两个相同的光纤镜在100次循环后经历了两种不同的灭菌过程(Steris 1™和Cidex OPA)。第一个在Steris系统中消毒,轴上有12毫米的撕裂,297根纤维受损,分辨率下降37%。第二种用Cidex消毒,只有10根纤维受损,没有明显的外部损伤。多年来,柔性输尿管镜的耐用性一直是人们关注的问题。据报道,翻新后的柔性输尿管镜在进行全面修复后非常脆弱,特别是如果它们被多名外科医生使用,这种情况会导致大量的维护、修复和管理费用[10]。事实上,有研究表明输尿管镜的耐用性有了一定的进步,单台输尿管镜的重复使用时间可达107.7小时,但最新的数据告诉我们,柔性输尿管镜的耐用性还有待提高。 此外,应该记住,使用LithoVue™,在每次手术中都体验到全新内窥镜的性能,避免了重复使用造成的偏转损失。在评估成本效益时,可重复使用的柔性输尿管镜除了清洁、消毒和灭菌费用以及与保健和时间消耗有关的费用外,还负担着购买、修理和服务费用。然而,一次性输尿管柔性镜带来了其自身及其相应工作站的购买和储存成本,以及与废物处理相关的成本。输尿管镜是一种半临界装置,因为它与患者的粘膜接触,必须用高水平的消毒剂消毒。未对镜架进行适当消毒可能导致感染的传播。输尿管镜的工作通道必须主动灌注高水平的消毒剂,否则消毒不会发生。这些步骤也得到了美国泌尿学协会的认可,不遵守这些步骤可能会导致尿路感染。这个过程构成了一个主要步骤,它解释了可重用范围的高开销。另外需要强调的是,LithoVue™的价格应该与每个国家的当地公司讨论,因为根据不同的购买方式以及不同的国家,成本可能会发生变化。所有这些问题都可以通过使用LithoVue™来避免,它保证了与新型可重复使用输尿管镜相同的性能,但没有可能的污染风险。Kaplan等人比较了LithoVue™、Flex-Xc (Karl Storz,德国)和Cobra (Richard Wolf,德国)的光学特性,得出结论,LithoVue™具有出色的光学性能、挠度和流量,从而使其成为标准的非一次性第四代柔性数字和光纤输尿管镜[11]的可行替代方案。此外,Proietti等人在对新鲜尸体的研究中,将LithoVue™与其他输尿管镜进行了比较,证明其视力和操作与其他输尿管镜相当。由于其可操作性[12],LithoVue™在这些实验中使用的所有肾单位中都是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Choosing a path for CEJU Location of ureteral access sheath in the ureter. Does it affect the fluid flow in different calyces? A new era and future of education: the impact of pandemic on online learning - a study from the European School of Urology. Spermatic vein thrombosis as a rare cause of testicular pain - review of the literature. Surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. One-year of follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1