The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective

IF 19.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Academy of Management Review Pub Date : 1993-10-01 DOI:10.5465/AMR.1993.9402210155
S. Gilliland
{"title":"The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective","authors":"S. Gilliland","doi":"10.5465/AMR.1993.9402210155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A justice model of applicants' reactions to employment-selection systems is proposed as a basis for organizing previous findings and guiding future research. Organizational justice literature is briefly reviewed, and key findings are used to provide a framework for the proposed model and to support hypotheses. The procedural justice of selection systems is examined in terms of 10 procedural rules, wherein the satisfaction and violation of these rules provide the basis for fairness reactions. Distributive justice of hiring decisions is examined with respect to equity, equality, and needs. The model also includes the interaction of procedural and distributive justice and the relationship of fairness reactions to individual and organizational outcomes.","PeriodicalId":7127,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5465/AMR.1993.9402210155","citationCount":"1116","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1993.9402210155","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1116

Abstract

A justice model of applicants' reactions to employment-selection systems is proposed as a basis for organizing previous findings and guiding future research. Organizational justice literature is briefly reviewed, and key findings are used to provide a framework for the proposed model and to support hypotheses. The procedural justice of selection systems is examined in terms of 10 procedural rules, wherein the satisfaction and violation of these rules provide the basis for fairness reactions. Distributive justice of hiring decisions is examined with respect to equity, equality, and needs. The model also includes the interaction of procedural and distributive justice and the relationship of fairness reactions to individual and organizational outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选拔系统的感知公平性:一个组织公正的视角
提出了申请人对就业选择制度反应的公正模型,作为组织以往研究成果和指导未来研究的基础。本文简要回顾了组织公正的相关文献,并利用其中的关键发现为提出的模型提供了框架,并支持了假设。从10条程序规则的角度考察了选拔制度的程序正义性,其中这些规则的满足和违反为公平反应提供了依据。招聘决策的分配公正是根据公平、平等和需求来审查的。该模型还包括程序正义和分配正义的相互作用,以及公平对个人和组织结果的反应关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The mission of AMR is to publish theoretical insights that advance our understanding of management and organizations. Submissions to AMR must extend theory in ways that develop testable knowledge-based claims. To do this, researchers can develop new management and organization theory, significantly challenge or clarify existing theory, synthesize recent advances and ideas into fresh, if not entirely new theory, or initiate a search for new theory by identifying and delineating a novel theoretical problem. The contributions of AMR articles often are grounded in “normal science disciplines” of economics, psychology, sociology, or social psychology as well as nontraditional perspectives, such as the humanities.
期刊最新文献
Editors’ Comments: Voices from the Periphery: Barriers to Publication in AMR and Opportunities for Inclusion Experts and Democratic Deliberation: Insights from An Enemy of the People Taming Artificial Intelligence: A Theory of Control-Acountability Alignment among AI Developers and Users Beyond Backlash: Advancing Dominant-Group Employees’ Learning, Allyship, and Growth Through Social Identity Threat Shaping the Opportunity Structure of Deviance: A Commentary on Rintamäki, Parker, and Spicer’s “Institutional Parasites”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1