EVALUATING THE BODY RESPONSE TO A 15-MINUTE WORKOUT PROPOSED AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO GYM TRAINING DURING LOCKDOWN CAUSED BY THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

IF 0.2 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES Acta Kinesiologica Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2021.15.2.10
Dariusz Boguszewsk, A. Szymanska, Justyna Wielgosz, Aleksandra Hanc, Jakub Grzegorz Adamczyk, D. Białoszewski
{"title":"EVALUATING THE BODY RESPONSE TO A 15-MINUTE WORKOUT PROPOSED AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO GYM TRAINING DURING LOCKDOWN CAUSED BY THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC","authors":"Dariusz Boguszewsk, A. Szymanska, Justyna Wielgosz, Aleksandra Hanc, Jakub Grzegorz Adamczyk, D. Białoszewski","doi":"10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2021.15.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the work was to study the body reaction to high intensity interval training. The study included 92 women aged 18 to -35. People who have been engaged in organised, regular physical activity (at least twice a week) were qualified to Group 1. Group 2 were physically inactive persons. All subjects performed interval training in the Tabata formula - two 4-minute sequences. The exercise carried out in the first part is elevating the legs from the “plank” position, in the second part, the hands were elevated from the same position. The pulse rate, the Borg Scale and the VAS pain rate scale (24, 48, 72 and 96 h after exercise) were used to assess the exercise intensity. The respondents from both groups performed the training at a similar intensity: the average heart rate after workout was 131 beats per minute. The highest pain of all muscle groups (when added together) was recorded 24 hours after training. The highest pain intensity during the four days after the training concerned the back and abdominal muscles in Group 1 and the muscles of the abdomen, back and arms (front and back). The intensity of abdominal and arm muscle pain (front) was significantly higher in Group 2. The proposed 15-minute workout planned in the form of Tabata evoked similar cardiovascular reactions in both groups and a similar subjective evaluation of intensity. Individuals who were physically active before the introduction of restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic had less pain in the muscular system after the applied training.","PeriodicalId":42772,"journal":{"name":"Acta Kinesiologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Kinesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2021.15.2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the work was to study the body reaction to high intensity interval training. The study included 92 women aged 18 to -35. People who have been engaged in organised, regular physical activity (at least twice a week) were qualified to Group 1. Group 2 were physically inactive persons. All subjects performed interval training in the Tabata formula - two 4-minute sequences. The exercise carried out in the first part is elevating the legs from the “plank” position, in the second part, the hands were elevated from the same position. The pulse rate, the Borg Scale and the VAS pain rate scale (24, 48, 72 and 96 h after exercise) were used to assess the exercise intensity. The respondents from both groups performed the training at a similar intensity: the average heart rate after workout was 131 beats per minute. The highest pain of all muscle groups (when added together) was recorded 24 hours after training. The highest pain intensity during the four days after the training concerned the back and abdominal muscles in Group 1 and the muscles of the abdomen, back and arms (front and back). The intensity of abdominal and arm muscle pain (front) was significantly higher in Group 2. The proposed 15-minute workout planned in the form of Tabata evoked similar cardiovascular reactions in both groups and a similar subjective evaluation of intensity. Individuals who were physically active before the introduction of restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic had less pain in the muscular system after the applied training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19大流行造成的封锁期间,评估身体对15分钟锻炼的反应,作为健身房训练的替代方案
这项工作的目的是研究身体对高强度间歇训练的反应。该研究包括92名年龄在18岁至35岁之间的女性。参加有组织的、有规律的体育活动(每周至少两次)的人符合第一组的条件。第二组为缺乏运动的人。所有受试者都按照Tabata公式进行间歇训练-两次4分钟的序列。在第一部分中进行的练习是从“平板支撑”的位置抬起腿,在第二部分中,从相同的位置抬起手。采用运动后24、48、72、96 h的脉搏率、Borg评分和VAS疼痛率量表评估运动强度。两组受访者的训练强度相似:锻炼后的平均心率为每分钟131次。所有肌肉群(当加在一起时)在训练后24小时记录最高疼痛。训练后4天内疼痛强度最高的部位为1组的背部和腹部肌肉,以及腹部、背部和手臂(前后)的肌肉。2组大鼠腹部及上臂肌肉(前部)疼痛强度明显增高。以Tabata的形式计划的15分钟锻炼在两组中引起了相似的心血管反应和相似的主观强度评估。在引入与COVID-19大流行相关的限制措施之前进行体力活动的个体在应用训练后肌肉系统疼痛减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Kinesiologica
Acta Kinesiologica SPORT SCIENCES-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Impact of new professional profiles of the sports kinesiologist, preventive and adapted motor activities kinesiologist and of sports manager in the current university education University education for physical education teachers, sports and preventive and adapted physical activities kinesiologists and sports manager Impact of the new professional profile of the basic kinesiologist on internal stakeholders Physical education in primary school and impact on primary teacher education students from two different university sites University training of the basic kinesiologist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1