THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE PERFORMANCE LEVEL AND TYPE OF SPORT AND THE QUALITY OF LIFE AND HEALTH SATISFACTION OF THE DISABLED WHO PRACTICE SPORT

IF 0.2 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES Acta Kinesiologica Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2022.16.1.14
M. Nowak, Marek Kolbowicz, Artur Sochacki, P. Król, Leonard Nowak, K. Kotarska
{"title":"THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE PERFORMANCE LEVEL AND TYPE OF SPORT AND THE QUALITY OF LIFE AND HEALTH SATISFACTION OF THE DISABLED WHO PRACTICE SPORT","authors":"M. Nowak, Marek Kolbowicz, Artur Sochacki, P. Król, Leonard Nowak, K. Kotarska","doi":"10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2022.16.1.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between the quality of life and health satisfaction with the level of sport performance in individuals practicing wheelchair basketball, wheelchair rugby, rowing and individual sports. The research included 192 athletes with disabilities, aged 19 to 49, from all over Poland. Males accounted for almost 80% of the subjects. The group of respondents included people who practice either competitive (classified) (n=66) (World Champions, Polish Champions) or amateur (unclassified) (n=126) sports. The standardized questionnaire of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) and a self-designed questionnaire were used. Nonparametric statistics were applied in the analyses of the results. The value of p≤0.05 was assumed to be statistically significant. It was found that amateurs felt greater health satisfaction and assessed their quality of life higher than the Polish Champions (p≤0.05). However, in the environmental domain, it was the Polish Champions who achieved better results (p≤0.05). In the social, physical and psychological domains, higher scores were achieved by amateur athletes as compared to the Polish and World Champions (p≤0.05). Wheelchair basketball athletes were more satisfied with their health and quality of life, as well as other domains (apart from environmental), as compared to wheelchair rugby and rowing athletes (p≤0.05). People aged 25-34, with education above the secondary level, employed, felt best about their quality of life. Improving the quality of life should be an important goal in the rehabilitation and training process of people with disabilities practicing sports.","PeriodicalId":42772,"journal":{"name":"Acta Kinesiologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Kinesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2022.16.1.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between the quality of life and health satisfaction with the level of sport performance in individuals practicing wheelchair basketball, wheelchair rugby, rowing and individual sports. The research included 192 athletes with disabilities, aged 19 to 49, from all over Poland. Males accounted for almost 80% of the subjects. The group of respondents included people who practice either competitive (classified) (n=66) (World Champions, Polish Champions) or amateur (unclassified) (n=126) sports. The standardized questionnaire of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) and a self-designed questionnaire were used. Nonparametric statistics were applied in the analyses of the results. The value of p≤0.05 was assumed to be statistically significant. It was found that amateurs felt greater health satisfaction and assessed their quality of life higher than the Polish Champions (p≤0.05). However, in the environmental domain, it was the Polish Champions who achieved better results (p≤0.05). In the social, physical and psychological domains, higher scores were achieved by amateur athletes as compared to the Polish and World Champions (p≤0.05). Wheelchair basketball athletes were more satisfied with their health and quality of life, as well as other domains (apart from environmental), as compared to wheelchair rugby and rowing athletes (p≤0.05). People aged 25-34, with education above the secondary level, employed, felt best about their quality of life. Improving the quality of life should be an important goal in the rehabilitation and training process of people with disabilities practicing sports.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动水平、运动类型与残疾人运动生活质量和健康满意度的关系
这项研究的目的是确定生活质量和健康满意度与个人进行轮椅篮球、轮椅橄榄球、划船和个人运动的运动表现水平之间的关系。这项研究包括来自波兰各地的192名19至49岁的残疾运动员。男性几乎占受试者的80%。受访者包括从事竞技(分类)(n=66)(世界冠军、波兰冠军)或业余(未分类)(n=126)运动的人。采用世界卫生组织生活质量标准问卷(WHOQOL-BREF)和自行设计的问卷。对结果进行非参数统计分析。假设p≤0.05值具有统计学意义。研究发现,与波兰冠军相比,业余运动员的健康满意度和生活质量评价更高(p≤0.05)。然而,在环境领域,波兰冠军取得了更好的成绩(p≤0.05)。在社会、身体和心理方面,业余运动员的得分高于波兰和世界冠军(p≤0.05)。轮椅篮球运动员比轮椅橄榄球和赛艇运动员更满意他们的健康和生活质量,以及其他领域(环境除外)(p≤0.05)。年龄在25-34岁之间、受过中等以上教育、有工作的人对自己的生活质量感觉最好。提高生活质量应成为残疾人体育康复训练过程中的重要目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Kinesiologica
Acta Kinesiologica SPORT SCIENCES-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Impact of new professional profiles of the sports kinesiologist, preventive and adapted motor activities kinesiologist and of sports manager in the current university education University education for physical education teachers, sports and preventive and adapted physical activities kinesiologists and sports manager Impact of the new professional profile of the basic kinesiologist on internal stakeholders Physical education in primary school and impact on primary teacher education students from two different university sites University training of the basic kinesiologist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1