Gestational diabetes, insulin resistance and physical activity in pregnancy in a multi-ethnic population – a public health perspective

Q3 Medicine Norsk Epidemiologi Pub Date : 2013-06-03 DOI:10.5324/NJE.V23I1.1602
A. K. Jenum, Kåre Rønn Richardsen, S. Berntsen, K. Mørkrid
{"title":"Gestational diabetes, insulin resistance and physical activity in pregnancy in a multi-ethnic population – a public health perspective","authors":"A. K. Jenum, Kåre Rønn Richardsen, S. Berntsen, K. Mørkrid","doi":"10.5324/NJE.V23I1.1602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To summarize findings from the STORK-Groruddalen Study regarding ethnic differences in the prevalence of gestational diabetes (GDM) by the WHO and modified International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria (no one hour value), insulin resistance, β-cell function and physical activity (PA) level. Methods: Population-based cohort study of 823 healthy pregnant women (59% ethnic minorities). Data from questionnaires, fasting blood samples, anthropometrics and objectively recorded PA level (SenseWear Armband), were collected at <20 (Visit 1) and 28±2 (Visit 2) weeks of gestation. The 75-g OGTT was performed at Visit 2. Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and β-cell function (HOMA-β) were estimated from venous fasting plasma glucose and C-peptide. Results: The GDM prevalence was 13.0% with the WHO and 31.5% with the IADPSG criteria. The ethnic minority women, especially South Asians, had highest figures. South and East Asian women had highest HOMA-IR at Visit 1 after adjustment for BMI. HOMA-IR increased from Visit 1 to Visit 2 irrespective of ethnic origin. Compared with Western European women, the absolute and percentage increase in HOMA-β from Visit 1 to Visit 2 was poorest for the South and East Asian women. All ethnic groups walked less and spent less time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during weekend days compared with weekdays. South Asian women were least active, measured by steps and by time spent in MVPA. Conclusion: Alarmingly high rates of GDM were found, highest among South Asians. South Asian women were less physically active, more insulin resistant and showed poorer β-cell compensation compared with Western Europeans.","PeriodicalId":35548,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Epidemiologi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norsk Epidemiologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5324/NJE.V23I1.1602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Aims: To summarize findings from the STORK-Groruddalen Study regarding ethnic differences in the prevalence of gestational diabetes (GDM) by the WHO and modified International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria (no one hour value), insulin resistance, β-cell function and physical activity (PA) level. Methods: Population-based cohort study of 823 healthy pregnant women (59% ethnic minorities). Data from questionnaires, fasting blood samples, anthropometrics and objectively recorded PA level (SenseWear Armband), were collected at <20 (Visit 1) and 28±2 (Visit 2) weeks of gestation. The 75-g OGTT was performed at Visit 2. Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and β-cell function (HOMA-β) were estimated from venous fasting plasma glucose and C-peptide. Results: The GDM prevalence was 13.0% with the WHO and 31.5% with the IADPSG criteria. The ethnic minority women, especially South Asians, had highest figures. South and East Asian women had highest HOMA-IR at Visit 1 after adjustment for BMI. HOMA-IR increased from Visit 1 to Visit 2 irrespective of ethnic origin. Compared with Western European women, the absolute and percentage increase in HOMA-β from Visit 1 to Visit 2 was poorest for the South and East Asian women. All ethnic groups walked less and spent less time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during weekend days compared with weekdays. South Asian women were least active, measured by steps and by time spent in MVPA. Conclusion: Alarmingly high rates of GDM were found, highest among South Asians. South Asian women were less physically active, more insulin resistant and showed poorer β-cell compensation compared with Western Europeans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多种族人群妊娠期糖尿病、胰岛素抵抗和身体活动——公共卫生视角
目的:总结stork - gruddalen研究中根据世卫组织和修订的国际糖尿病和妊娠研究小组协会(IADPSG)标准(无一小时值)、胰岛素抵抗、β细胞功能和身体活动(PA)水平在妊娠糖尿病(GDM)患病率方面的种族差异的发现。方法:对823例健康孕妇(59%为少数民族)进行人群队列研究。在妊娠<20周(访1)和28±2周(访2)时收集问卷调查、空腹血样、人体测量和客观记录的PA水平(SenseWear Armband)数据。在就诊2时进行75 g OGTT。胰岛素抵抗(HOMA- ir)和β细胞功能(HOMA-β)通过静脉空腹血糖和c肽来评估。结果:按WHO标准GDM患病率为13.0%,按IADPSG标准GDM患病率为31.5%。少数民族妇女,特别是南亚妇女的比例最高。在调整BMI后,南亚和东亚女性在第一次访问时的HOMA-IR最高。无论种族出身如何,HOMA-IR从第一次访问到第二次访问都有所增加。与西欧妇女相比,南亚和东亚妇女从第一次访问到第二次访问的HOMA-β的绝对增长和百分比增长是最贫穷的。与工作日相比,所有种族的人在周末散步的时间都更少,在中等到高强度身体活动(MVPA)上花费的时间也更少。以步数和MVPA活动时间来衡量,南亚女性最不活跃。结论:GDM的发生率高得惊人,在南亚人群中最高。与西欧女性相比,南亚女性体力活动较少,胰岛素耐受性更强,β细胞代偿能力更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Norsk Epidemiologi
Norsk Epidemiologi Medicine-Epidemiology
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The impact of longitudinal surveillance of individuals with CP in Norway; a 20-year quality registry and follow-up program perspective Nasjonalt register for gastrokirurgi (NORGAST): noen tanker etter ti år External validation of SAPS II score reported to the Norwegian Intensive Care and Pandemic Registry (NIPaR) MS-registeret: meget viktig for MS-pasientene og enda viktigere fremover Et lederperspektiv – nytten av medisinske kvalitetsregistre og hvordan vi bruker disse i forbedringsarbeid og praksisendring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1