Phylogenetics of the Borage Family: Delimiting Boraginales and Assessing Closest Relatives

Aliso Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.5642/ALISO.20173501.04
Kristen Hasenstab-Lehman
{"title":"Phylogenetics of the Borage Family: Delimiting Boraginales and Assessing Closest Relatives","authors":"Kristen Hasenstab-Lehman","doi":"10.5642/ALISO.20173501.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The placement of Boraginales, and relationships within the family have remained elusive in modern, broad phylogenetic studies. In order to assess the phylogeny of Boraginales, and specifically to test the sister lineage of the order, a data matrix of the chloroplast markers rbcL, ndhF, and trnL-trnF was assembled fromGenBank and de novo sequences (representing 132 newGenBank accessions). Phylogenies inferred using Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian frameworks resulted in identical topologies. Tests for alternative topologies were used to assess whether any of the candidates for sister (Solanales, Gentianales, Lamiales, or Vahlia) to Boraginales could be ruled out with this dataset. Gentianales was eliminated as the possible closest relative to Boraginales. Additionally, SH tests were used to test topological results within Boraginales: monophyly of Hydrophyllaceae cannot be rejected and paraphyly of Ehretiaceae with respect to the parasitic Lennoaceae is supported. Taxonomic implications are discussed within the context of these phylogenetic results.","PeriodicalId":80410,"journal":{"name":"Aliso","volume":"35 1","pages":"41-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aliso","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5642/ALISO.20173501.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The placement of Boraginales, and relationships within the family have remained elusive in modern, broad phylogenetic studies. In order to assess the phylogeny of Boraginales, and specifically to test the sister lineage of the order, a data matrix of the chloroplast markers rbcL, ndhF, and trnL-trnF was assembled fromGenBank and de novo sequences (representing 132 newGenBank accessions). Phylogenies inferred using Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian frameworks resulted in identical topologies. Tests for alternative topologies were used to assess whether any of the candidates for sister (Solanales, Gentianales, Lamiales, or Vahlia) to Boraginales could be ruled out with this dataset. Gentianales was eliminated as the possible closest relative to Boraginales. Additionally, SH tests were used to test topological results within Boraginales: monophyly of Hydrophyllaceae cannot be rejected and paraphyly of Ehretiaceae with respect to the parasitic Lennoaceae is supported. Taxonomic implications are discussed within the context of these phylogenetic results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
琉璃苣科的系统发育:琉璃苣科的划分和近亲的鉴定
在现代广泛的系统发育研究中,博拉基纳目的位置和家族内的关系仍然难以捉摸。为了评估该植物的系统发育,特别是对其姐妹谱系进行检测,我们从genbank和de novo序列(代表132个genbank新加入的序列)中收集了叶绿体标记rbcL、ndhF和trnL-trnF的数据矩阵。系统发生推断使用最大似然和贝叶斯框架导致相同的拓扑结构。使用替代拓扑的测试来评估是否可以使用该数据集排除Boraginales的姐妹(Solanales, Gentianales, Lamiales或Vahlia)的任何候选人。作为可能与博拉基纳莱斯最接近的亲戚,龙胆亚纳莱斯被排除了。此外,SH测试被用于测试Boraginales的拓扑结果:不能拒绝hydrophyllacae的单系性,并且支持Ehretiaceae相对于寄生Lennoaceae的半系性。在这些系统发育结果的背景下讨论了分类学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Question of Priority: Pterospora andromedea Nuttall vs. Monotropa procera Torrey ex Eaton (Monotropoideae, Ericaceae) Sherwin Carlquist (1930-2021) - A Botanical Luminary Contents 40(1–2) A Vascular Flora of the Selkirk Mountains, Bonner and Boundary Counties, Idaho Reviewers of Manuscripts, Volumes 39-40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1