Toward validation of simulated accelerograms via prediction equations for nonlinear SDOF response

IF 0.7 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Bollettino Di Geofisica Teorica Ed Applicata Pub Date : 2014-03-01 DOI:10.4430/BGTA0114
F. Luca, G. Ameri, I. Iervolino, F. Pacor, D. Bindi
{"title":"Toward validation of simulated accelerograms via prediction equations for nonlinear SDOF response","authors":"F. Luca, G. Ameri, I. Iervolino, F. Pacor, D. Bindi","doi":"10.4430/BGTA0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seismic structural risk analysis of critical facilities may require nonlinear dynamic analysis for which record selection is one of the key issues. Notwithstanding the increasing availability of database of strong-motion records, it may be hard to find accelerograms that fit a specific scenario (e.g., in terms of magnitude and distance) resulting from hazard assessment at the site of interest. A possible, alternative, approach can be the use of artificial and/or simulated ground motion in lieu of real records. Their employment requires systematic engineering validation in terms of structural response and/or seismic risk. Prediction equations for peak and cyclic inelastic single degree of freedom systems’ response, based on Italian accelerometric data, are discussed in this study as a possible benchmark, alongside real record counterparts, for the validation of synthetic records. Even if multiple events would be in principle required, an extremely preliminary validation is carried out considering only four simulated records of the 1980 Irpinia (Southern Italy) Mw 6.9 earthquake. Simulated records are obtained through a broadband hybrid integral-composite technique. Results show how this simulation method may lead to generally acceptable results. It is also emphasized how this kind of validation may provide additional results with respect to classical signal-to-signal comparison of real and simulated records.","PeriodicalId":50728,"journal":{"name":"Bollettino Di Geofisica Teorica Ed Applicata","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4430/BGTA0114","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bollettino Di Geofisica Teorica Ed Applicata","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4430/BGTA0114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Seismic structural risk analysis of critical facilities may require nonlinear dynamic analysis for which record selection is one of the key issues. Notwithstanding the increasing availability of database of strong-motion records, it may be hard to find accelerograms that fit a specific scenario (e.g., in terms of magnitude and distance) resulting from hazard assessment at the site of interest. A possible, alternative, approach can be the use of artificial and/or simulated ground motion in lieu of real records. Their employment requires systematic engineering validation in terms of structural response and/or seismic risk. Prediction equations for peak and cyclic inelastic single degree of freedom systems’ response, based on Italian accelerometric data, are discussed in this study as a possible benchmark, alongside real record counterparts, for the validation of synthetic records. Even if multiple events would be in principle required, an extremely preliminary validation is carried out considering only four simulated records of the 1980 Irpinia (Southern Italy) Mw 6.9 earthquake. Simulated records are obtained through a broadband hybrid integral-composite technique. Results show how this simulation method may lead to generally acceptable results. It is also emphasized how this kind of validation may provide additional results with respect to classical signal-to-signal comparison of real and simulated records.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非线性SDOF响应预测方程对模拟加速度的验证
关键设施的地震结构风险分析可能需要进行非线性动力分析,其中记录选择是关键问题之一。尽管强震记录数据库的可用性越来越高,但可能很难找到符合特定情景(例如,在震级和距离方面)的加速度,这些加速度是在感兴趣的地点进行危害评估后得出的。另一种可能的替代方法是使用人工和/或模拟的地面运动来代替真实的记录。它们的使用需要在结构响应和/或地震风险方面进行系统的工程验证。基于意大利加速度数据的峰值和循环非弹性单自由度系统响应的预测方程,在本研究中作为可能的基准进行了讨论,与真实记录对应,用于验证合成记录。即使原则上需要多个事件,也只考虑了1980年伊尔皮尼亚(意大利南部)6.9级地震的四个模拟记录,进行了极其初步的验证。通过宽带混合积分-复合技术获得模拟记录。结果表明,这种模拟方法可能导致普遍可接受的结果。还强调了这种验证如何提供关于真实和模拟记录的经典信号对信号比较的额外结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bollettino Di Geofisica Teorica Ed Applicata
Bollettino Di Geofisica Teorica Ed Applicata 地学-地球化学与地球物理
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The "Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata" is an international open access journal dedicated to the publication of original papers dealing with Deep Earth Geophysics, Near Surface Geophysics, Exploration Geophysics, Borehole Geophysics, Geodynamics and Seismotectonics, Seismology, Engineering Seismology, Geophysical Modelling, Geodesy, Remote Sensing, Seismic and Geodetic Networks, Oceanography, and their application in the fields of Energy, Natural Resources, Environment and Climate, Policies and Regulations, Risk and Security, Technological Development.
期刊最新文献
The 6 May 1976 Friuli earthquake: re-evaluating and consolidating transnational macroseismic data Seismogenic zonation as a branch of the logic tree for the new Italian seismic hazard map - MPS16: a preliminary outline Controlled laboratory test for the investigation of LNAPL contamination using a 2.0 GHz ground penetrating radar Genetic algorithm full-waveform inversion: uncertainty estimation and validation of the results GPR Investigation to map the sub-soil of the St. John Lateran Basilica (Rome, Italy)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1