Injury Potential from Herbicide Combinations in Enlist® Cotton

IF 0.7 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Journal of cotton science Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.56454/gzxa4524
C. Samples, G. Kruger, D. Dodds, J. T. Irby, D. Reynolds, Angus L. Catchot Jr.
{"title":"Injury Potential from Herbicide Combinations in Enlist® Cotton","authors":"C. Samples, G. Kruger, D. Dodds, J. T. Irby, D. Reynolds, Angus L. Catchot Jr.","doi":"10.56454/gzxa4524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enlist® cotton with tolerance to 2,4-D choline, glyphosate, and glufosinate became publicly available in 2016 to aid growers in controlling glyphosate-resistant weed species. Little data exist regarding the tolerance of Enlist cotton to herbicide tank mixtures containing glyphosate, glufosinate, 2,4-D choline, and S-metolachlor. The objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerance of Enlist cotton to herbicide tank mixtures including these herbicides. Field studies were conducted in 2016 and 2017 where cotton was sprayed with herbicide combinations containing glyphosate, glufosinate, S-metolachlor, 2,4-D choline, and a premix formulation of glyphosate and S-metolachlor. Crop injury consisted of necrosis, chlorosis, visual stunting, injury on new growth, and total injury at 7, 14, and 28 days after application (DAA). Cotton lint yield was recorded at the conclusion of each growing season. The greatest levels of necrosis and total injury at 7 DAA were observed following applications of glufosinate + S-metolachlor, alone or in combination with glyphosate or glyphosate + 2,4-D choline. The least amount of necrosis and total injury at 7 DAA was observed following applications of glyphosate, glufosinate, S-metolachlor, glyphosate + glufosinate, or glyphosate + S-metolachlor, which produced less than 13% injury. Visual injury at 14 DAA ranged from 8 to 16% across herbicides applied. At 28 DAA, no differences in visual injury were reported. Lint yield was unaffected by herbicide application. Although transient visual injury is expected, Enlist cotton withstood herbicide applications with up to four modes of action in tankmixture without suffering yield reduction.","PeriodicalId":15558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cotton science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cotton science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56454/gzxa4524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enlist® cotton with tolerance to 2,4-D choline, glyphosate, and glufosinate became publicly available in 2016 to aid growers in controlling glyphosate-resistant weed species. Little data exist regarding the tolerance of Enlist cotton to herbicide tank mixtures containing glyphosate, glufosinate, 2,4-D choline, and S-metolachlor. The objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerance of Enlist cotton to herbicide tank mixtures including these herbicides. Field studies were conducted in 2016 and 2017 where cotton was sprayed with herbicide combinations containing glyphosate, glufosinate, S-metolachlor, 2,4-D choline, and a premix formulation of glyphosate and S-metolachlor. Crop injury consisted of necrosis, chlorosis, visual stunting, injury on new growth, and total injury at 7, 14, and 28 days after application (DAA). Cotton lint yield was recorded at the conclusion of each growing season. The greatest levels of necrosis and total injury at 7 DAA were observed following applications of glufosinate + S-metolachlor, alone or in combination with glyphosate or glyphosate + 2,4-D choline. The least amount of necrosis and total injury at 7 DAA was observed following applications of glyphosate, glufosinate, S-metolachlor, glyphosate + glufosinate, or glyphosate + S-metolachlor, which produced less than 13% injury. Visual injury at 14 DAA ranged from 8 to 16% across herbicides applied. At 28 DAA, no differences in visual injury were reported. Lint yield was unaffected by herbicide application. Although transient visual injury is expected, Enlist cotton withstood herbicide applications with up to four modes of action in tankmixture without suffering yield reduction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
除草剂组合对Enlist®棉花的潜在伤害
2016年,对2,4- d胆碱、草甘膦和草铵膦具有耐受性的Enlist®棉花公开上市,以帮助种植者控制抗草甘膦杂草物种。关于棉花对含有草甘膦、草甘膦、2,4- d胆碱和s -异甲草胺的除草剂罐混合物的耐受性的数据很少。本研究的目的是评价征地棉对含有这些除草剂的除草剂罐混合物的耐受性。在2016年和2017年进行的实地研究中,棉花喷洒了含有草甘膦、草甘膦、s -异甲草胺、2,4- d胆碱以及草甘膦和s -异甲草胺预混制剂的除草剂组合。在施用后7、14和28 d (DAA),作物损伤表现为坏死、褪绿、视觉发育迟缓、新生损伤和总损伤。在每个生长季节结束时记录棉绒产量。在7 DAA时,草甘膦+ s -甲草胺单独或与草甘膦或草甘膦+ 2,4- d胆碱联合应用后,观察到最大程度的坏死和总损伤。在7 DAA时,草甘膦、草甘膦、s -异甲草胺、草甘膦+草甘膦或草甘膦+ s -异甲草胺的坏死和总损伤量最小,造成的损伤小于13%。不同除草剂对14 DAA的视觉伤害在8%到16%之间。在28 DAA时,视觉损伤无差异。棉花产量不受除草剂施用的影响。虽然短暂的视觉损伤是预期的,但在罐混合物中使用多达四种作用模式的除草剂,棉耐受性不会降低产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cotton science
Journal of cotton science AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The multidisciplinary, refereed journal contains articles that improve our understanding of cotton science. Publications may be compilations of original research, syntheses, reviews, or notes on original research or new techniques or equipment.
期刊最新文献
Utility of Hooded Broadcast Sprayer in Reducing Herbicide Particle Drift in Cotton Effects of Potassium Rates and Timing on Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality Seed Hull Fracture Resistance of Upland and Pima Cotton Cultivars Cotton Seed Size – What is the “Fuzz” all About? Evaluation of Practices to Unwrap Round Cotton Modules
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1