Understanding Irrigated Cotton Producer’s Crop Insurance Coverage Level Choices Under the 2014 Farm Bill

IF 0.7 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Journal of cotton science Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.56454/erjf7679
Kishor P. Luitel, D. Hudson, T. Knight
{"title":"Understanding Irrigated Cotton Producer’s Crop Insurance Coverage Level Choices Under the 2014 Farm Bill","authors":"Kishor P. Luitel, D. Hudson, T. Knight","doi":"10.56454/erjf7679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Agricultural Act of 2014 (2014 Farm Bill) significantly changed the Title I commodity programs, and shallow loss insurance programs were added to the federal crop insurance program (Title XI). Stacked Income Protection Plan and Supplemental Coverage Option were new insurance programs enacted in the 2014 Farm Bill. Participation in these programs is influenced by premium subsidies and the type of coverage provided. Relationships between insurance agents and producers also have the potential to influence program participation. These changes could impact the producer’s insurance choice decision. The overall objective of this research is to understand the impact of the new insurance options on Texas cotton producers’ risk management decisions and participation and understand the change in coverage level of primary crop insurance due to availably of other protection. A mail survey was conducted among cotton producers in Texas to collect insurance choices data for 2014 and anticipated choices for 2015. Responses from 42% of Texas counties were received. In 2015, the USDA Risk Management Agency reported 155 counties in Texas produced cotton. Regression analysis conducted on anticipated change in coverage level of crop insurance indicated Common Crop Insurance Policy coverage level choice for larger farm size and higher non-farm income had an increase in coverage level effect; whereas enterprise unit, revenue protection, price, yield, and insurance agents had a decrease in coverage level effect. Results suggest that greater insurance agent involvement in program design and implementation of an insurance program could contribute to program success.","PeriodicalId":15558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cotton science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cotton science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56454/erjf7679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Agricultural Act of 2014 (2014 Farm Bill) significantly changed the Title I commodity programs, and shallow loss insurance programs were added to the federal crop insurance program (Title XI). Stacked Income Protection Plan and Supplemental Coverage Option were new insurance programs enacted in the 2014 Farm Bill. Participation in these programs is influenced by premium subsidies and the type of coverage provided. Relationships between insurance agents and producers also have the potential to influence program participation. These changes could impact the producer’s insurance choice decision. The overall objective of this research is to understand the impact of the new insurance options on Texas cotton producers’ risk management decisions and participation and understand the change in coverage level of primary crop insurance due to availably of other protection. A mail survey was conducted among cotton producers in Texas to collect insurance choices data for 2014 and anticipated choices for 2015. Responses from 42% of Texas counties were received. In 2015, the USDA Risk Management Agency reported 155 counties in Texas produced cotton. Regression analysis conducted on anticipated change in coverage level of crop insurance indicated Common Crop Insurance Policy coverage level choice for larger farm size and higher non-farm income had an increase in coverage level effect; whereas enterprise unit, revenue protection, price, yield, and insurance agents had a decrease in coverage level effect. Results suggest that greater insurance agent involvement in program design and implementation of an insurance program could contribute to program success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解灌溉棉花生产者在2014年农业法案下的作物保险覆盖水平选择
2014年农业法案(2014年农业法案)对标题1的商品项目进行了重大修改,并在联邦作物保险项目(标题11)中增加了轻微损失保险项目。叠加收入保护计划和补充保险选择是2014年农业法案中制定的新保险项目。参与这些计划受到保费补贴和所提供的保险类型的影响。保险代理人和制片人之间的关系也有可能影响节目的参与。这些变化可能会影响生产者的保险选择决策。本研究的总体目标是了解新的保险选择对德克萨斯州棉花生产者风险管理决策和参与的影响,并了解由于其他保护的可用性而导致初级作物保险覆盖水平的变化。在德克萨斯州的棉花生产商中进行了一项邮件调查,以收集2014年的保险选择数据和2015年的预期选择。收到了来自德州42%县的回复。2015年,美国农业部风险管理机构报告称,德克萨斯州有155个县生产棉花。对作物保险覆盖水平预期变化的回归分析表明,农户规模越大、非农收入越高时,普通作物保险政策覆盖水平的选择增加了覆盖水平效应;而企业单位、收益保护、价格、收益和保险代理人对保险覆盖水平的影响则有所降低。结果表明,更多的保险代理人参与保险计划的设计和实施可能有助于计划的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cotton science
Journal of cotton science AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The multidisciplinary, refereed journal contains articles that improve our understanding of cotton science. Publications may be compilations of original research, syntheses, reviews, or notes on original research or new techniques or equipment.
期刊最新文献
Utility of Hooded Broadcast Sprayer in Reducing Herbicide Particle Drift in Cotton Effects of Potassium Rates and Timing on Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality Seed Hull Fracture Resistance of Upland and Pima Cotton Cultivars Cotton Seed Size – What is the “Fuzz” all About? Evaluation of Practices to Unwrap Round Cotton Modules
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1