Assessing the Influence of Spindle Harvester Drum Arrangement on Fiber Quality and Yield

IF 0.7 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Journal of cotton science Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.56454/lzyk5974
M. V. D. VAN DER SLUIJS, J. Wanjura, R. Boman, G. Holt, M. Pelletier
{"title":"Assessing the Influence of Spindle Harvester Drum Arrangement on Fiber Quality and Yield","authors":"M. V. D. VAN DER SLUIJS, J. Wanjura, R. Boman, G. Holt, M. Pelletier","doi":"10.56454/lzyk5974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On spindle type cotton harvesters, spindles are attached to bars which are arranged on rotating drums. Opposed drum harvesting units position one drum on each side of the row, whereas harvesting units with an in-line drum arrangement position both drums on the right side of the plant row. Two studies conducted in Australia and the United States focused on comparing drum arrangements in regard to harvesting efficiency and fiber quality as there has been no recent published research using high yielding commercial varieties. These studies concluded that there were slight, but insignificant differences among opposed and in-line drum arrangements in terms of harvesting efficiency and lint turn out. Although only statistically significant for the work conducted in the US, lint ginned from seed cotton harvested by the opposed drum arrangement contained more trash than that harvested by the in-line arrangement. In both countries there were small insignificant differences in terms of fiber color (both Rd and +b), length, and micronaire, after ginning and lint cleaning. Although not observed in Australia, small significant differences in length uniformity and strength were observed in favor of the opposed drum arrangement in the US. Measured only in Australia, there were no significant differences between the two drum arrangements in terms of short fiber index, fineness, and maturity. There was also no significant difference between the two drum arrangements in terms of total, fibrous and seed-coat nep content, and size.","PeriodicalId":15558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cotton science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cotton science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56454/lzyk5974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On spindle type cotton harvesters, spindles are attached to bars which are arranged on rotating drums. Opposed drum harvesting units position one drum on each side of the row, whereas harvesting units with an in-line drum arrangement position both drums on the right side of the plant row. Two studies conducted in Australia and the United States focused on comparing drum arrangements in regard to harvesting efficiency and fiber quality as there has been no recent published research using high yielding commercial varieties. These studies concluded that there were slight, but insignificant differences among opposed and in-line drum arrangements in terms of harvesting efficiency and lint turn out. Although only statistically significant for the work conducted in the US, lint ginned from seed cotton harvested by the opposed drum arrangement contained more trash than that harvested by the in-line arrangement. In both countries there were small insignificant differences in terms of fiber color (both Rd and +b), length, and micronaire, after ginning and lint cleaning. Although not observed in Australia, small significant differences in length uniformity and strength were observed in favor of the opposed drum arrangement in the US. Measured only in Australia, there were no significant differences between the two drum arrangements in terms of short fiber index, fineness, and maturity. There was also no significant difference between the two drum arrangements in terms of total, fibrous and seed-coat nep content, and size.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纺锤式收割机滚筒布置对纤维品质和产量影响的评价
在纺锤式棉花收割机上,纺锤连接在设置在旋转滚筒上的杆上。对置滚筒收获装置将一个滚筒放置在排的每一侧,而具有直线滚筒布置的收获装置将两个滚筒放置在植物排的右侧。在澳大利亚和美国进行的两项研究侧重于比较收获效率和纤维质量方面的滚筒布置,因为最近没有发表使用高产商业品种的研究。这些研究表明,对置滚筒和顺置滚筒在收获效率和出棉率方面存在轻微但不显著的差异。虽然在美国进行的工作中只有统计意义,但通过对置滚筒方式收获的棉籽棉比通过直线方式收获的棉籽棉含有更多的垃圾。在这两个国家中,纤维的颜色(Rd和+b)、长度和纤毛清洗后的马克隆值都有细微的差别。虽然在澳大利亚没有观察到,但在长度均匀性和强度方面,在美国观察到有利于相反的鼓布置的显着差异。仅在澳大利亚测量,两种卷筒布置在短纤维指数、细度和成熟度方面没有显著差异。两种籽粒排列方式在总羽节含量、纤维羽节含量和种皮羽节含量以及大小方面也无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cotton science
Journal of cotton science AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The multidisciplinary, refereed journal contains articles that improve our understanding of cotton science. Publications may be compilations of original research, syntheses, reviews, or notes on original research or new techniques or equipment.
期刊最新文献
Utility of Hooded Broadcast Sprayer in Reducing Herbicide Particle Drift in Cotton Effects of Potassium Rates and Timing on Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality Seed Hull Fracture Resistance of Upland and Pima Cotton Cultivars Cotton Seed Size – What is the “Fuzz” all About? Evaluation of Practices to Unwrap Round Cotton Modules
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1