Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis: Group B Streptococcal Compared to E. coli Disease

Renoldner B, Hofer N, Resch B
{"title":"Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis: Group B Streptococcal Compared to E. coli Disease","authors":"Renoldner B, Hofer N, Resch B","doi":"10.4172/2167-0897.1000201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Early onset sepsis (EOS) of the newborn is a severe disease and associated with high morbidity and mortality. Aim of the study was to compare perinatal, short-term outcome and laboratory data of neonates with early-onset sepsis (EOS) either due to Group B Streptococci (GBS) or Escherichia coli (E. coli) infection. \nMethods: Retrospective cohort analysis of all neonates with culture proven GBS and E. coli EOS born between 1993 and 2011 and hospitalized at the NICU of the Medical University of Graz, Austria. Data were analyzed regarding perinatal, laboratory and short-term outcome data. \nResults: During the study period 100 neonates with EOS due to GBS and 11 neonates with E. coli infection were hospitalized at our NICU. Perinatal and short-term outcome data differed between GBS and E. coli infection regarding gestational age (median 38 vs. 32 weeks, p=.005), birth weight (median 3095 vs. 1836 grams, p=.031), presence of hypothermia (0 vs. 18%, p=.009), duration of mechanical ventilation (4 vs. 8 days, p=.019), duration of therapy with supplemental oxygen (9 vs. 2 days, p=.031), length of hospitalization (15 vs. 22 days, p=.039), presence of chorioamnionitis (17 vs. 46%, p=.041) and maternal fever (2 vs. 18%, p=.049). Mortality rates did not differ significantly (6 vs. 18%, p=.180). Laboratory data regarding white blood cell count, IT-ratio, and CRP value were not different between groups within the first 72 hours of life. There was a significant decrease of GBS sepsis during the study period (p=0,014). Conclusion: Main differences between GBS and E. coli infections were due to higher rates of preterm birth in the E. coli group, clinical and laboratory characteristics only differed marginally.","PeriodicalId":73850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal biology","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2167-0897.1000201","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0897.1000201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Early onset sepsis (EOS) of the newborn is a severe disease and associated with high morbidity and mortality. Aim of the study was to compare perinatal, short-term outcome and laboratory data of neonates with early-onset sepsis (EOS) either due to Group B Streptococci (GBS) or Escherichia coli (E. coli) infection. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of all neonates with culture proven GBS and E. coli EOS born between 1993 and 2011 and hospitalized at the NICU of the Medical University of Graz, Austria. Data were analyzed regarding perinatal, laboratory and short-term outcome data. Results: During the study period 100 neonates with EOS due to GBS and 11 neonates with E. coli infection were hospitalized at our NICU. Perinatal and short-term outcome data differed between GBS and E. coli infection regarding gestational age (median 38 vs. 32 weeks, p=.005), birth weight (median 3095 vs. 1836 grams, p=.031), presence of hypothermia (0 vs. 18%, p=.009), duration of mechanical ventilation (4 vs. 8 days, p=.019), duration of therapy with supplemental oxygen (9 vs. 2 days, p=.031), length of hospitalization (15 vs. 22 days, p=.039), presence of chorioamnionitis (17 vs. 46%, p=.041) and maternal fever (2 vs. 18%, p=.049). Mortality rates did not differ significantly (6 vs. 18%, p=.180). Laboratory data regarding white blood cell count, IT-ratio, and CRP value were not different between groups within the first 72 hours of life. There was a significant decrease of GBS sepsis during the study period (p=0,014). Conclusion: Main differences between GBS and E. coli infections were due to higher rates of preterm birth in the E. coli group, clinical and laboratory characteristics only differed marginally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早发新生儿败血症:B组链球菌与大肠杆菌病的比较
背景:新生儿早发性脓毒症(EOS)是一种严重的疾病,发病率和死亡率都很高。该研究的目的是比较B群链球菌(GBS)或大肠杆菌(E. coli)感染的早发性脓毒症(EOS)新生儿的围产期、短期预后和实验室数据。方法:回顾性队列分析1993 - 2011年出生并在奥地利格拉茨医科大学NICU住院的所有培养证实的GBS和大肠杆菌EOS新生儿。对围产期、实验室和短期预后数据进行分析。结果:研究期间,我院新生儿重症监护室共收治100例GBS致EOS新生儿和11例大肠杆菌感染新生儿。围产期和短期结果GBS和大肠杆菌感染之间的数据不同胎龄(平均38和32周,p = .005),出生体重(平均3095和1836克,p = .031),出现体温过低(0和18%,p = .009),机械通气时间(4和8天,p = .019),治疗期间补充氧气(9和2天,p = .031),住院时间(15和22天,p = .039),存在绒毛膜羊膜炎(17比46%,p = .041)和孕产妇发烧(2比18%,p = .049)。死亡率无显著差异(6比18%,p= 0.180)。在生命最初的72小时内,两组之间关于白细胞计数、it比率和CRP值的实验室数据没有差异。在研究期间,GBS脓毒症显著减少(p= 0.014)。结论:GBS与大肠杆菌感染的主要差异在于大肠杆菌组的早产率较高,临床和实验室特征仅略有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Routine Screening for Sickle Cell Disease during Pregnancy: Epidemiological and Haemoglobin Profile in Congo. Editorial on Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome Neonatal: Levels of Neonatal Nursery Editorial on Large Congenital Melanocytic Nevus Diagnosis of Neonatal Bowel Obstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1