Assessment of Emotional Intelligence in Pediatric and Med-Peds Residents

R. Shahid, Jerold Stirling, W. Adams
{"title":"Assessment of Emotional Intelligence in Pediatric and Med-Peds Residents","authors":"R. Shahid, Jerold Stirling, W. Adams","doi":"10.5455/JCME.20170116015415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the baseline emotional intelligence (EI) scores of Pediatric and Med-Peds Residents and to identify components of emotional intelligence that were high or low. Methods Residents from Pediatrics and Med-Peds residency programs at a university-based training program volunteered to complete an online self-report EI survey (EQ-i 2.0) in May 2015. A summary EI score report was generated for each resident by a consulting firm. De-identified score reports were compared between programs and by year of training. Results All pediatric and med-peds residents completed the survey (N=47). The median score for the group as a whole for overall emotional intelligence was higher than the national average and considered to be in the high range (110). The highest median subcomponent scores were in Impulse Control (114) and Empathy (113) and the lowest subcomponent scores were in Independence (101) and Assertiveness (102). No difference was seen between pediatric residents and medicine-pediatric residents in their total EI scores or the various components. Residents in their early years of training (PGY 1-2) compared to later years of training (PGY 3-4) showed significant differences in the component of Assertiveness (100 vs 109, p=0.002) and Empathy (115.5 vs 110, p=0.03). Conclusions As a group, Pediatric and Med-Peds residents scored lowest in areas of independence and assertiveness. While assertiveness scores improved with added years of training, empathy scores decreased. In order to improve the overall level of emotional intelligence of Pediatric and Med-Peds residents, educational interventions should focus on the areas of independence, assertiveness, and empathy.","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"129 1","pages":"153-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JCME.20170116015415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the baseline emotional intelligence (EI) scores of Pediatric and Med-Peds Residents and to identify components of emotional intelligence that were high or low. Methods Residents from Pediatrics and Med-Peds residency programs at a university-based training program volunteered to complete an online self-report EI survey (EQ-i 2.0) in May 2015. A summary EI score report was generated for each resident by a consulting firm. De-identified score reports were compared between programs and by year of training. Results All pediatric and med-peds residents completed the survey (N=47). The median score for the group as a whole for overall emotional intelligence was higher than the national average and considered to be in the high range (110). The highest median subcomponent scores were in Impulse Control (114) and Empathy (113) and the lowest subcomponent scores were in Independence (101) and Assertiveness (102). No difference was seen between pediatric residents and medicine-pediatric residents in their total EI scores or the various components. Residents in their early years of training (PGY 1-2) compared to later years of training (PGY 3-4) showed significant differences in the component of Assertiveness (100 vs 109, p=0.002) and Empathy (115.5 vs 110, p=0.03). Conclusions As a group, Pediatric and Med-Peds residents scored lowest in areas of independence and assertiveness. While assertiveness scores improved with added years of training, empathy scores decreased. In order to improve the overall level of emotional intelligence of Pediatric and Med-Peds residents, educational interventions should focus on the areas of independence, assertiveness, and empathy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科和儿科住院医师情绪智力的评估
目的本研究的目的是确定儿科和医学儿科住院医生的情绪智力(EI)基线得分,并确定情绪智力的高或低组成部分。方法2015年5月,来自某大学儿科和医学-儿科住院医师培训项目的住院医师自愿完成一份在线自我报告EI调查(EQ-i 2.0)。一家咨询公司为每位居民生成了一份汇总的EI评分报告。去识别的分数报告在不同的项目和不同的培训年份之间进行了比较。结果所有儿科住院医师均完成调查(N=47)。这群人整体情绪智力的中位数高于全国平均水平,被认为处于高水平(110分)。得分中位数最高的是冲动控制(114分)和共情(113分),得分中位数最低的是独立(101分)和自信(102分)。儿科住院医师和医学-儿科住院医师在EI总分或各组成部分上没有差异。住院医师在早期培训(PGY 1-2)与后期培训(PGY 3-4)相比,在自信(100 vs 109, p=0.002)和同理心(115.5 vs 110, p=0.03)方面表现出显著差异。作为一个群体,儿科和医学儿科住院医生在独立性和自信方面得分最低。虽然自信得分随着训练年限的增加而提高,但同理心得分却下降了。为了提高儿科和医学儿科住院医师的整体情商水平,教育干预应侧重于独立性、自信和同理心方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence-based practice conversations with clinical supervisors during paramedic placements: an exploratory study of students' perceptions. The use of mixed methods social network analysis to evaluate healthcare professionals' educator development: an exploratory study. A Four-Pronged Approach for Evaluating e-Learning Modules with a Newly Developed Instructional Design Scale Performance-based assessment in a pre-clinical medical school chest radiology curriculum: Student achievement and attitudes Oral assessments; Knowledge and perception of faculty in undergraduate dentistry program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1