Performance-based assessment in a pre-clinical medical school chest radiology curriculum: Student achievement and attitudes

F. Mahmoud, T. P. Sullivan, D. Ensminger, Amany Aziz, Khalid Alsabban, T. Demos, J. Lim-Dunham
{"title":"Performance-based assessment in a pre-clinical medical school chest radiology curriculum: Student achievement and attitudes","authors":"F. Mahmoud, T. P. Sullivan, D. Ensminger, Amany Aziz, Khalid Alsabban, T. Demos, J. Lim-Dunham","doi":"10.5455/jcme.20190429063757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate student achievement and attitudes pertaining to a performance-based assessment in a medical student chest radiology curriculum using mixed quantitative and qualitative methods. Methods: One-hundred-and-sixty-one participating second-year students, in the 2015-16 academic year took a post-curriculum multiple choice question (MCQ) exam. Students also underwent a performance-based assessment in the form of a chest x-ray interpretation small-group session administered by radiology faculty at a picture archiving and communications system (PACS) workstation. Each student verbally interpreted one chest radiograph showing one of 6 pathologies and was given a numerical rating based on a standardized rubric. This score was compared to the correctness of the student’s answer to the corresponding MCQ question on the same topic. All students completed a post-session questionnaire. Open-ended free-text responses regarding student attitudes were coded into qualitative themes by three independent raters. High inter-rater agreement was demonstrated by average agreement index of .82 or greater (ranging from 0-1, with 1 indicating perfect agreement) for responses to the most frequent themes. Results: There was no significant association between scores on MCQ exam and performance-based assessment. Up to 90% of post-session questionnaire respondents indicated a Likert rating of 5 (strongly agree) when asked if the sessions improved understanding of chest x-rays and their ability to identify specific radiologic pathology. Dominant themes from open-ended responses were then derived. Conclusions: Lack of agreement between student performance on the chest x-ray interpretation small-group session and that on the parallel MCQ exam suggests that they each measure a different type of achievement, with the former emphasizing skills over knowledge. Features most commonly valued by students in the performance-based assessment were its ability to reinforce prior knowledge, supply an authentic and relevant PACS experience simulating real life, and provide an opportunity for active practice of radiology interpretive skills.","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"10 1","pages":"94-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20190429063757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate student achievement and attitudes pertaining to a performance-based assessment in a medical student chest radiology curriculum using mixed quantitative and qualitative methods. Methods: One-hundred-and-sixty-one participating second-year students, in the 2015-16 academic year took a post-curriculum multiple choice question (MCQ) exam. Students also underwent a performance-based assessment in the form of a chest x-ray interpretation small-group session administered by radiology faculty at a picture archiving and communications system (PACS) workstation. Each student verbally interpreted one chest radiograph showing one of 6 pathologies and was given a numerical rating based on a standardized rubric. This score was compared to the correctness of the student’s answer to the corresponding MCQ question on the same topic. All students completed a post-session questionnaire. Open-ended free-text responses regarding student attitudes were coded into qualitative themes by three independent raters. High inter-rater agreement was demonstrated by average agreement index of .82 or greater (ranging from 0-1, with 1 indicating perfect agreement) for responses to the most frequent themes. Results: There was no significant association between scores on MCQ exam and performance-based assessment. Up to 90% of post-session questionnaire respondents indicated a Likert rating of 5 (strongly agree) when asked if the sessions improved understanding of chest x-rays and their ability to identify specific radiologic pathology. Dominant themes from open-ended responses were then derived. Conclusions: Lack of agreement between student performance on the chest x-ray interpretation small-group session and that on the parallel MCQ exam suggests that they each measure a different type of achievement, with the former emphasizing skills over knowledge. Features most commonly valued by students in the performance-based assessment were its ability to reinforce prior knowledge, supply an authentic and relevant PACS experience simulating real life, and provide an opportunity for active practice of radiology interpretive skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床前医学院胸部放射学课程的绩效评估:学生成绩与态度
目的:本研究的目的是利用混合的定量和定性方法来评估医科学生胸部放射学课程中学生的成绩和对基于成绩的评估的态度。方法:161名参与的二年级学生在2015-16学年参加了课程后选择题(MCQ)考试。学生们还在图像存档和通信系统(PACS)工作站接受了由放射科教师管理的胸部x射线解释小组会议的表现评估。每个学生口头解释一张胸片,显示6种病理之一,并根据标准化标准给予数字评级。这个分数与学生对同一主题相应MCQ问题的回答的正确性进行了比较。所有学生都完成了一份课后问卷。关于学生态度的开放式自由文本回答由三个独立的评价者编码成定性主题。对于最常见的主题,评分者的平均一致指数为0.82或更高(范围从0-1,1表示完全一致),这表明评分者之间的一致性很高。结果:MCQ考试成绩与绩效评估之间无显著相关性。当被问及治疗是否提高了对胸部x光片的理解和识别特定放射病理学的能力时,高达90%的治疗后问卷受访者表示李克特评分为5分(强烈同意)。然后从开放式回答中得出主导主题。结论:学生在胸部x线解释小组考试中的表现与平行MCQ考试中的表现缺乏一致性,这表明他们各自衡量的是不同类型的成就,前者强调技能而不是知识。在基于绩效的评估中,学生最常重视的特点是它能够强化先前的知识,提供真实和相关的模拟现实生活的PACS体验,并为放射学解释技能的积极实践提供机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence-based practice conversations with clinical supervisors during paramedic placements: an exploratory study of students' perceptions. The use of mixed methods social network analysis to evaluate healthcare professionals' educator development: an exploratory study. A Four-Pronged Approach for Evaluating e-Learning Modules with a Newly Developed Instructional Design Scale Performance-based assessment in a pre-clinical medical school chest radiology curriculum: Student achievement and attitudes Oral assessments; Knowledge and perception of faculty in undergraduate dentistry program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1