Should drawing be incorporated into the teaching of anatomy

M. Borrelli, B. Leung, M. Morgan, S. Saxena, A. Hunter
{"title":"Should drawing be incorporated into the teaching of anatomy","authors":"M. Borrelli, B. Leung, M. Morgan, S. Saxena, A. Hunter","doi":"10.5455/JCME.20180411105347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Art has played a pivotal role in the understanding and teaching of human anatomy for centuries, and the use of drawing as a teaching tool had been well documented. With the global modernization of medical education, the teaching of anatomy has diminished. We present a model of teaching anatomy through drawing, and assess its efficacy in improving students’ retention of anatomical knowledge. Methods: We designed a series of four anatomy drawing workshops (upper limb, lower limb, thorax, and head & neck) for students studying medicine, dentistry, and allied science degrees. Students were only allowed to attend one of the four workshops. Workshops were delivered by medically-qualified anatomy demonstrators using a combination of “whiteboard drawing demonstrations” and “cadaveric demonstrations and drawings.” A pre- and post-anatomy test consisting of 12 multiple choice questions (MCQs) and quantitative self-score questionnaires on “confidence in drawing anatomy” and “anatomical knowledge” were completed. Qualitative questionnaires on “reasons for attendance,” “skills learnt,” and “what improvements could be made” were also completed. Results: A total of 49 students attended the drawing workshops, the majority studied medicine (58.3%). Twenty-seven pre- and post-anatomy MCQ tests were completed, and demonstrated a significant mean improvement of 1.11 points (p = 0.001). “Confidence in drawing anatomy” and “Knowledge of anatomy” significantly improved by 43.2% and 41.4% (p = 0.001), respectively. Only 13% of students used drawing as their “main learning tool.” The most commonly reported barrier in using drawing as a revision tool was “time constraints.” Qualitative feedback was excellent. Students suggested that these workshops should be integrated into the core anatomy curriculum. Conclusion: Learning anatomy through drawing, is not only more engaging and fun, encourages students to visualize and better understand anatomical planes, thus, allowing them to retain anatomical knowledge easier. The two-part nature of our sessions enabled students to apply and translate the more conceptual knowledge from the “whiteboard drawing demonstration” onto the more “real-life” structures in the “prosection and cadaveric demonstration.” With the decline in anatomy teaching throughout universities, most prominently dissection, drawing may offer an alternative and economical way of training students to learn anatomy.","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"6 1","pages":"34-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JCME.20180411105347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Introduction: Art has played a pivotal role in the understanding and teaching of human anatomy for centuries, and the use of drawing as a teaching tool had been well documented. With the global modernization of medical education, the teaching of anatomy has diminished. We present a model of teaching anatomy through drawing, and assess its efficacy in improving students’ retention of anatomical knowledge. Methods: We designed a series of four anatomy drawing workshops (upper limb, lower limb, thorax, and head & neck) for students studying medicine, dentistry, and allied science degrees. Students were only allowed to attend one of the four workshops. Workshops were delivered by medically-qualified anatomy demonstrators using a combination of “whiteboard drawing demonstrations” and “cadaveric demonstrations and drawings.” A pre- and post-anatomy test consisting of 12 multiple choice questions (MCQs) and quantitative self-score questionnaires on “confidence in drawing anatomy” and “anatomical knowledge” were completed. Qualitative questionnaires on “reasons for attendance,” “skills learnt,” and “what improvements could be made” were also completed. Results: A total of 49 students attended the drawing workshops, the majority studied medicine (58.3%). Twenty-seven pre- and post-anatomy MCQ tests were completed, and demonstrated a significant mean improvement of 1.11 points (p = 0.001). “Confidence in drawing anatomy” and “Knowledge of anatomy” significantly improved by 43.2% and 41.4% (p = 0.001), respectively. Only 13% of students used drawing as their “main learning tool.” The most commonly reported barrier in using drawing as a revision tool was “time constraints.” Qualitative feedback was excellent. Students suggested that these workshops should be integrated into the core anatomy curriculum. Conclusion: Learning anatomy through drawing, is not only more engaging and fun, encourages students to visualize and better understand anatomical planes, thus, allowing them to retain anatomical knowledge easier. The two-part nature of our sessions enabled students to apply and translate the more conceptual knowledge from the “whiteboard drawing demonstration” onto the more “real-life” structures in the “prosection and cadaveric demonstration.” With the decline in anatomy teaching throughout universities, most prominently dissection, drawing may offer an alternative and economical way of training students to learn anatomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解剖学教学中应该加入绘画吗
几个世纪以来,艺术在人体解剖学的理解和教学中发挥了关键作用,并且使用绘画作为教学工具已经得到了很好的记录。随着全球医学教育的现代化,解剖学的教学已经减少。我们提出了一种通过绘图教学解剖学的模式,并评估了其在提高学生解剖学知识记忆方面的效果。方法:我们为医学、牙科和相关科学学位的学生设计了一系列的四个解剖绘画工作坊(上肢、下肢、胸部和头颈部)。学生们只被允许参加四个工作坊中的一个。讲习班由具有医学资格的解剖演示人员提供,使用“白板绘图演示”和“尸体演示和绘图”的组合。完成了解剖前和解剖后的测试,包括12个选择题(mcq)和定量自我评分问卷,内容包括“绘制解剖的信心”和“解剖知识”。还完成了关于“出勤原因”、“学到的技能”和“可以做出哪些改进”的定性问卷调查。结果:共有49名学生参加了绘画工作坊,以医学专业为主(58.3%)。27个解剖前和解剖后的MCQ测试完成,结果显示平均改善1.11点(p = 0.001)。“绘制解剖学的信心”和“解剖学知识”分别显著提高了43.2%和41.4% (p = 0.001)。只有13%的学生将绘画作为他们的“主要学习工具”。使用绘图作为复习工具最常见的障碍是“时间限制”。定性反馈非常好。学生们建议将这些工作坊整合到核心解剖学课程中。结论:通过绘画来学习解剖学,不仅更吸引人,更有趣,还能让学生更好地想象和理解解剖平面,从而使他们更容易记住解剖知识。我们的课程分为两部分,使学生能够将“白板绘画演示”中的概念性知识应用和转化为“检控和尸体演示”中更“现实”的结构。随着大学解剖学教学的减少,尤其是解剖、绘画可能提供了另一种经济的方法来训练学生学习解剖学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence-based practice conversations with clinical supervisors during paramedic placements: an exploratory study of students' perceptions. The use of mixed methods social network analysis to evaluate healthcare professionals' educator development: an exploratory study. A Four-Pronged Approach for Evaluating e-Learning Modules with a Newly Developed Instructional Design Scale Performance-based assessment in a pre-clinical medical school chest radiology curriculum: Student achievement and attitudes Oral assessments; Knowledge and perception of faculty in undergraduate dentistry program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1