Medical and allied health Students' self-regulated learning: the interplay between motivational beliefs and learning strategies

F. Ngwira, Mary Kamwaza, S. Rashid, Grace Boby, Grace Kadzakumanja
{"title":"Medical and allied health Students' self-regulated learning: the interplay between motivational beliefs and learning strategies","authors":"F. Ngwira, Mary Kamwaza, S. Rashid, Grace Boby, Grace Kadzakumanja","doi":"10.5455/JCME.20181013060753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Research on academic self-regulation suggests that students’ self-efficacy, intrinsic goal orientation, deep approach to learning and organized studying improve students’ academic performance. The primary goal of the study was to investigate the extent to which students perceive their motivational beliefs and their self-regulated learning strategy use, and examine the relationship between the two constructs; motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning strategies. Methods: A sample of 205 first year students (121 males and 84 females) from College of Medicine in Malawi responded to a 5-point Likert-type scale questionnaire assessing their self-efficacy, intrinsic goal orientation and learning strategies. Data were analyzed using IBM® SPSS® Statistics, version 20. Results: Compared with learning strategies, students reported higher levels of motivational beliefs; self-efficacy (M = 4.37, SD = 0.64); intrinsic goal orientation (M = 4.09, SD = 0.68). Male students had higher levels of intrinsic goal orientation than their female counterparts (p < 0.05), and first-generation students had higher levels of deep strategy than non-first-generation students (p < 0.05). Linear regression results indicate that both self-efficacy and intrinsic goal orientation positively predicted deep learning strategies (self-efficacy: β = 0.21; intrinsic: β = 0.41), meta-cognitive strategies (self-efficacy: β = 0.30; intrinsic: β = 0.38), and resource management (self-efficacy: β = 0.25; intrinsic: β = 0.26). Conclusion: The results suggest that first year medical and allied health students possess intrinsically strong motivational beliefs and that these beliefs have an important impact on their deep learning approach and organized studying. Possible implications of the results and recommendations for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JCME.20181013060753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: Research on academic self-regulation suggests that students’ self-efficacy, intrinsic goal orientation, deep approach to learning and organized studying improve students’ academic performance. The primary goal of the study was to investigate the extent to which students perceive their motivational beliefs and their self-regulated learning strategy use, and examine the relationship between the two constructs; motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning strategies. Methods: A sample of 205 first year students (121 males and 84 females) from College of Medicine in Malawi responded to a 5-point Likert-type scale questionnaire assessing their self-efficacy, intrinsic goal orientation and learning strategies. Data were analyzed using IBM® SPSS® Statistics, version 20. Results: Compared with learning strategies, students reported higher levels of motivational beliefs; self-efficacy (M = 4.37, SD = 0.64); intrinsic goal orientation (M = 4.09, SD = 0.68). Male students had higher levels of intrinsic goal orientation than their female counterparts (p < 0.05), and first-generation students had higher levels of deep strategy than non-first-generation students (p < 0.05). Linear regression results indicate that both self-efficacy and intrinsic goal orientation positively predicted deep learning strategies (self-efficacy: β = 0.21; intrinsic: β = 0.41), meta-cognitive strategies (self-efficacy: β = 0.30; intrinsic: β = 0.38), and resource management (self-efficacy: β = 0.25; intrinsic: β = 0.26). Conclusion: The results suggest that first year medical and allied health students possess intrinsically strong motivational beliefs and that these beliefs have an important impact on their deep learning approach and organized studying. Possible implications of the results and recommendations for future research are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医联体学生自我调节学习:动机信念与学习策略的相互作用
目的:学业自我调节的研究表明,学生的自我效能感、内在目标导向、深度学习方法和有组织的学习可以提高学生的学业成绩。本研究的主要目的是探讨学生对动机信念和自我调节学习策略使用的认知程度,以及两者之间的关系;动机信念和自我调节学习策略。方法:对马拉维医学院205名一年级学生(男121名,女84名)进行自我效能感、内在目标取向和学习策略的李克特5分式问卷调查。数据分析使用IBM®SPSS®Statistics, version 20。结果:与学习策略相比,学生的动机信念水平较高;自我效能感(M = 4.37, SD = 0.64);内在目标取向(M = 4.09, SD = 0.68)。男学生的内在目标取向水平高于女学生(p < 0.05),第一代学生的深度策略水平高于非第一代学生(p < 0.05)。线性回归结果表明,自我效能感和内在目标取向对深度学习策略均有正向预测作用(自我效能感:β = 0.21;内在:β = 0.41),元认知策略(自我效能:β = 0.30;内在:β = 0.38),资源管理(自我效能:β = 0.25;内在:β = 0.26)。结论:医联体一年级学生具有较强的内在动机信念,这些信念对其深度学习方法和组织学习有重要影响。讨论了研究结果可能产生的影响以及对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence-based practice conversations with clinical supervisors during paramedic placements: an exploratory study of students' perceptions. The use of mixed methods social network analysis to evaluate healthcare professionals' educator development: an exploratory study. A Four-Pronged Approach for Evaluating e-Learning Modules with a Newly Developed Instructional Design Scale Performance-based assessment in a pre-clinical medical school chest radiology curriculum: Student achievement and attitudes Oral assessments; Knowledge and perception of faculty in undergraduate dentistry program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1