YouTube is a feasible tool to disseminate educational toxicology videoconferences: The Global Educational Toxicology Uniting Project (GETUP).

Anselm Wong, R. Vohra, A. Creaton, Z. Koutsogiannis, S. Greene
{"title":"YouTube is a feasible tool to disseminate educational toxicology videoconferences: The Global Educational Toxicology Uniting Project (GETUP).","authors":"Anselm Wong, R. Vohra, A. Creaton, Z. Koutsogiannis, S. Greene","doi":"10.5455/JCME.20170620103357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: GETUP has filled an important void in global education about poisoning management by linking countries with and without toxicology services through videoconferencing and educating primary healthcare doctors and other health professionals. However, timezone incompatibilities among geographically remote sites may mean some parties are unable to attend all videoconferences. Recorded video is one potential solution for asynchronous learning using GETUP case materials, but its utilization has not been adequately defined. We aimed to assess the feasibility of YouTube to disseminate recorded toxicology videoconferences and analyse its usage. Methods: We performed a review of nine recorded videoconferences recorded on Google Hangouts™ and stored on YouTube™ from March 2014 to August 2015. YouTube Analytics™ data were used to measure web traffic and viewer trends. Results: There were 204 views of the nine videoconferences during the study period. The main groups involved in making the recorded conferences included the Austin Toxicology Service, Victoria, Australia; Fresno Toxicology Service, California, USA and the Emergency Department, Suva, Fiji. The majority of views (59%) were by viewers in the 25 to 34 age bracket. Viewers were located in 20 countries over six continents. Thirty-three percent (67 views) were from 18 states in the USA. Devices used to playback these conferences included computer (93%), mobile phone (5.3%), tablet (1%) and unknown (0.7%). Conclusions: Recorded video available over the Internet is feasible method to disseminate toxicology based educational videoconferences around the world and gather important information about how medical professionals tend to consume case-based toxicology educational contents.","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"5 1","pages":"34-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JCME.20170620103357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: GETUP has filled an important void in global education about poisoning management by linking countries with and without toxicology services through videoconferencing and educating primary healthcare doctors and other health professionals. However, timezone incompatibilities among geographically remote sites may mean some parties are unable to attend all videoconferences. Recorded video is one potential solution for asynchronous learning using GETUP case materials, but its utilization has not been adequately defined. We aimed to assess the feasibility of YouTube to disseminate recorded toxicology videoconferences and analyse its usage. Methods: We performed a review of nine recorded videoconferences recorded on Google Hangouts™ and stored on YouTube™ from March 2014 to August 2015. YouTube Analytics™ data were used to measure web traffic and viewer trends. Results: There were 204 views of the nine videoconferences during the study period. The main groups involved in making the recorded conferences included the Austin Toxicology Service, Victoria, Australia; Fresno Toxicology Service, California, USA and the Emergency Department, Suva, Fiji. The majority of views (59%) were by viewers in the 25 to 34 age bracket. Viewers were located in 20 countries over six continents. Thirty-three percent (67 views) were from 18 states in the USA. Devices used to playback these conferences included computer (93%), mobile phone (5.3%), tablet (1%) and unknown (0.7%). Conclusions: Recorded video available over the Internet is feasible method to disseminate toxicology based educational videoconferences around the world and gather important information about how medical professionals tend to consume case-based toxicology educational contents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
YouTube是传播教育毒理学视频会议的可行工具:全球教育毒理学联合项目(GETUP)。
通过视频会议和教育初级保健医生和其他卫生专业人员,将有和没有毒理学服务的国家联系起来,填补了全球中毒管理教育中的一个重要空白。然而,地理位置遥远的站点之间的时区不兼容可能意味着一些各方无法参加所有的视频会议。录制视频是使用GETUP案例材料进行异步学习的一种潜在解决方案,但其使用尚未得到充分定义。我们旨在评估YouTube传播毒理学视频会议记录的可行性,并分析其使用情况。方法:我们对2014年3月至2015年8月期间在谷歌Hangouts上录制并存储在YouTube上的9次视频会议进行了回顾。YouTube Analytics的数据被用来衡量网络流量和观众趋势。结果:研究期间9次视频会议共204次观看。参与录制会议的主要团体包括澳大利亚维多利亚的奥斯汀毒理学服务处;美国加利福尼亚州弗雷斯诺毒理学处和斐济苏瓦急诊科。大多数观众(59%)是25岁至34岁年龄段的观众。观众来自六大洲的20个国家。33%(67次观看)来自美国的18个州。用于播放这些会议的设备包括电脑(93%)、手机(5.3%)、平板电脑(1%)和未知设备(0.7%)。结论:在互联网上提供的录制视频是在世界范围内传播基于毒理学的教育视频会议的可行方法,并收集关于医疗专业人员如何倾向于消费基于案例的毒理学教育内容的重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence-based practice conversations with clinical supervisors during paramedic placements: an exploratory study of students' perceptions. The use of mixed methods social network analysis to evaluate healthcare professionals' educator development: an exploratory study. A Four-Pronged Approach for Evaluating e-Learning Modules with a Newly Developed Instructional Design Scale Performance-based assessment in a pre-clinical medical school chest radiology curriculum: Student achievement and attitudes Oral assessments; Knowledge and perception of faculty in undergraduate dentistry program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1