Choosing Primary Care as a Profession: A Systematic Review

McKinley Thomas, Jeff Jones
{"title":"Choosing Primary Care as a Profession: A Systematic Review","authors":"McKinley Thomas, Jeff Jones","doi":"10.5455/jcme.20180625062031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of primary care as a means toward individual and community health is unchallenged. However, with the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) entering the field on the decline in the United States, a clear view of the career pipeline becomes crucial, especially with regard to the role of medical education. The literature posits a number of predictive variables as important determinants of career selection. Much of the research focused on career decisions is based upon preclinical ideation rather than occupational outcomes. We conducted a synthesis of the literature to explore factors most influential when selecting primary care as a profession. CINAHL, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, and PubMed MEDLINE were explored from January 2008 to December 2017 to identify salient factors associated with a career decision to follow a primary care pathway. This review yielded 226 publications with 27 meeting our inclusion and quality criteria. Our analysis generated five overarching categories that best represent salient influences toward primary care as a career: general academic experiences, pipeline programs, student debt, characteristics of the educational institution, and student characteristics. We found that career decisions toward primary care were best supported by sound medical educational practice, remunerative expectations, and individual qualities such as familial background and preferred lifestyle. Our findings are congruent with earlier analyses in that academic experiences play an important role in career development toward primary care. However, our study did not capture rural experiences or demographic factors, both reported in previous studies in which preclinical students were queried. For medical educators, administrators, and students themselves, these outcomes represent largely modifiable factors when addressing the looming physician shortage.","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"313 1","pages":"28-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20180625062031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The importance of primary care as a means toward individual and community health is unchallenged. However, with the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) entering the field on the decline in the United States, a clear view of the career pipeline becomes crucial, especially with regard to the role of medical education. The literature posits a number of predictive variables as important determinants of career selection. Much of the research focused on career decisions is based upon preclinical ideation rather than occupational outcomes. We conducted a synthesis of the literature to explore factors most influential when selecting primary care as a profession. CINAHL, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, and PubMed MEDLINE were explored from January 2008 to December 2017 to identify salient factors associated with a career decision to follow a primary care pathway. This review yielded 226 publications with 27 meeting our inclusion and quality criteria. Our analysis generated five overarching categories that best represent salient influences toward primary care as a career: general academic experiences, pipeline programs, student debt, characteristics of the educational institution, and student characteristics. We found that career decisions toward primary care were best supported by sound medical educational practice, remunerative expectations, and individual qualities such as familial background and preferred lifestyle. Our findings are congruent with earlier analyses in that academic experiences play an important role in career development toward primary care. However, our study did not capture rural experiences or demographic factors, both reported in previous studies in which preclinical students were queried. For medical educators, administrators, and students themselves, these outcomes represent largely modifiable factors when addressing the looming physician shortage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择初级保健作为职业:系统回顾
初级保健作为实现个人和社区健康的一种手段的重要性是不容置疑的。然而,随着美国初级保健医生(pcp)进入该领域的人数不断下降,对职业发展渠道的清晰认识变得至关重要,特别是在医学教育的作用方面。文献假设了一些预测变量作为职业选择的重要决定因素。许多关于职业决策的研究都是基于临床前的想法,而不是职业结果。我们对文献进行了综合,以探索在选择初级保健作为职业时最具影响力的因素。从2008年1月到2017年12月,我们对CINAHL、Web of Science、Ovid MEDLINE和PubMed MEDLINE进行了研究,以确定与选择初级保健途径的职业决定相关的显著因素。本综述共纳入226篇文献,其中27篇符合我们的纳入标准和质量标准。我们的分析产生了五个最能代表对初级保健作为职业的显著影响的总体类别:一般学术经历、管道项目、学生债务、教育机构特征和学生特征。我们发现,良好的医学教育实践、薪酬预期和个人素质(如家庭背景和首选生活方式)最能支持初级保健的职业决定。我们的研究结果与早期的分析一致,即学术经历在初级保健的职业发展中起着重要作用。然而,我们的研究没有捕捉到农村经验或人口因素,这两者在之前的研究中都有报道,这些研究询问了临床前学生。对于医学教育工作者、管理人员和学生自己来说,这些结果在解决迫在眉睫的医生短缺问题时,在很大程度上代表了可修改的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence-based practice conversations with clinical supervisors during paramedic placements: an exploratory study of students' perceptions. The use of mixed methods social network analysis to evaluate healthcare professionals' educator development: an exploratory study. A Four-Pronged Approach for Evaluating e-Learning Modules with a Newly Developed Instructional Design Scale Performance-based assessment in a pre-clinical medical school chest radiology curriculum: Student achievement and attitudes Oral assessments; Knowledge and perception of faculty in undergraduate dentistry program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1