How open minded medical students really are? A pilot study.

Vasiliki Spatoula, E. Panagopoulou
{"title":"How open minded medical students really are? A pilot study.","authors":"Vasiliki Spatoula, E. Panagopoulou","doi":"10.5455/jcme.20191015115111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Despite the identified biases in the provision of health, no studies have so far compared stereotypes of medical students with students from other disciplines. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare attitudes of medical and social science students towards population groups of different ethnic background, age, and sexual orientation. Given the social desirability biases associated with explicit attitude assessment through self-report, and the feasibility issues of implicit attitude testing, the study also developed and piloted the Attitude and Opinion Scale, a self report instrument designed to assess attitudes and reduce social desirability. Method: Ninety third year students from the Medical School and the Social Sciences Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, completed the Attitude and Opinion Scale. Results: Results showed statistical significant differences in attitudes towards groups of different sexual orientation (t=2.687, p=.009) and age (t=-2.554, p=.012). Conclusions: This pilot study indicated that medical students have more negative attitudes towards some population groups compared to students of social sciences. Increasing attention has to be paid in undergraduate medical courses to the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors required for the effective and culturally safe practice of medicine in culturally and gender diverse settings.","PeriodicalId":90586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medical education","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20191015115111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite the identified biases in the provision of health, no studies have so far compared stereotypes of medical students with students from other disciplines. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare attitudes of medical and social science students towards population groups of different ethnic background, age, and sexual orientation. Given the social desirability biases associated with explicit attitude assessment through self-report, and the feasibility issues of implicit attitude testing, the study also developed and piloted the Attitude and Opinion Scale, a self report instrument designed to assess attitudes and reduce social desirability. Method: Ninety third year students from the Medical School and the Social Sciences Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, completed the Attitude and Opinion Scale. Results: Results showed statistical significant differences in attitudes towards groups of different sexual orientation (t=2.687, p=.009) and age (t=-2.554, p=.012). Conclusions: This pilot study indicated that medical students have more negative attitudes towards some population groups compared to students of social sciences. Increasing attention has to be paid in undergraduate medical courses to the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors required for the effective and culturally safe practice of medicine in culturally and gender diverse settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医科学生的思想到底有多开放?一项初步研究。
目的:尽管在提供保健方面存在明确的偏见,但迄今为止还没有研究将医学生的刻板印象与其他学科的学生进行比较。本横断面研究的目的是比较医学和社会科学学生对不同种族背景、年龄和性取向人群的态度。考虑到通过自我报告进行外显态度评估的社会可取性偏差,以及内隐态度测试的可行性问题,本研究还开发并试点了一种旨在评估态度和降低社会可取性的自我报告工具——态度与意见量表。方法:对希腊塞萨洛尼基亚里斯多德大学医学院和社会科学系93年级学生进行态度与意见问卷调查。结果:结果显示,不同性取向人群的态度差异有统计学意义(t=2.687, p= 0.009),年龄差异有统计学意义(t=-2.554, p= 0.012)。结论:本初步研究表明,医学生对某些人群的负面态度比社会科学专业的学生多。在本科医学课程中,必须越来越多地关注在文化和性别不同的环境中有效和文化上安全的医学实践所需的知识、态度和行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence-based practice conversations with clinical supervisors during paramedic placements: an exploratory study of students' perceptions. The use of mixed methods social network analysis to evaluate healthcare professionals' educator development: an exploratory study. A Four-Pronged Approach for Evaluating e-Learning Modules with a Newly Developed Instructional Design Scale Performance-based assessment in a pre-clinical medical school chest radiology curriculum: Student achievement and attitudes Oral assessments; Knowledge and perception of faculty in undergraduate dentistry program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1