Utility of nuclear morphometry in serous ovarian carcinoma and its correlation with grades

Dibyajyoti Boruah
{"title":"Utility of nuclear morphometry in serous ovarian carcinoma and its correlation with grades","authors":"Dibyajyoti Boruah","doi":"10.5455/JIHP.20170607073657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The main objectives of this study were: To evaluate nuclear major axis (MAJX) and minor axis (MINX), nuclear area (NA), nuclear perimeter (NP), nuclear aspect ratio (NAR), and nuclear roundness (NR) with their variability using morphometric techniques in malignant and benign ovarian tumors and to correlate them with histological grades. Methods: Morphometric parameters were evaluated in 8 low-grade (LG) and 22 high-grade (HG) serous ovarian carcinoma and 30 benign grade (BG) cases by digital image morphometric technique using histological sections. Results: The mean of the size-related nuclear parameters: MAJX, MINX, NA, NP, and their variability were statistically significantly greater (P < 0.01) in malignant cases than benign, whereas mean NAR and its variability were significantly lower in malignant cases. Mean NR was significantly higher but its variability (standard deviation - NR) was significantly lower in malignant cases. Histological grade exhibited strong positive correlation with MAJX ( ρ = 0.864), MINX ( ρ = 0.882), NA ( ρ = 0.875), NP ( ρ = 0.859), and moderate positive correlation with NR ( ρ = 0.682); unlike NAR ( ρ = −0.794). Except NR, all other parameters showed positive correlation with their variability. Mean MINX and NA in HG tumor were statistically significantly higher (P < 0.05). For all malignant cases: MINX > 5.03 µm and NA > 30.44 µm 2 can be used to differentiate from benign with 100% efficiency. Conclusion: Morphometric parameters related to nuclear size and their variability were significantly larger in malignant cases than the benign and showed strong positive correlation with the grades. Nuclear shapes of the malignant nuclei were rounder than the benign. Nuclear morphometry can be gainfully exploited in the diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma quantitatively.","PeriodicalId":91320,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interdisciplinary histopathology","volume":"1 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interdisciplinary histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JIHP.20170607073657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The main objectives of this study were: To evaluate nuclear major axis (MAJX) and minor axis (MINX), nuclear area (NA), nuclear perimeter (NP), nuclear aspect ratio (NAR), and nuclear roundness (NR) with their variability using morphometric techniques in malignant and benign ovarian tumors and to correlate them with histological grades. Methods: Morphometric parameters were evaluated in 8 low-grade (LG) and 22 high-grade (HG) serous ovarian carcinoma and 30 benign grade (BG) cases by digital image morphometric technique using histological sections. Results: The mean of the size-related nuclear parameters: MAJX, MINX, NA, NP, and their variability were statistically significantly greater (P < 0.01) in malignant cases than benign, whereas mean NAR and its variability were significantly lower in malignant cases. Mean NR was significantly higher but its variability (standard deviation - NR) was significantly lower in malignant cases. Histological grade exhibited strong positive correlation with MAJX ( ρ = 0.864), MINX ( ρ = 0.882), NA ( ρ = 0.875), NP ( ρ = 0.859), and moderate positive correlation with NR ( ρ = 0.682); unlike NAR ( ρ = −0.794). Except NR, all other parameters showed positive correlation with their variability. Mean MINX and NA in HG tumor were statistically significantly higher (P < 0.05). For all malignant cases: MINX > 5.03 µm and NA > 30.44 µm 2 can be used to differentiate from benign with 100% efficiency. Conclusion: Morphometric parameters related to nuclear size and their variability were significantly larger in malignant cases than the benign and showed strong positive correlation with the grades. Nuclear shapes of the malignant nuclei were rounder than the benign. Nuclear morphometry can be gainfully exploited in the diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma quantitatively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
浆液性卵巢癌核形态测定的应用及其与分级的关系
目的:本研究的主要目的是:利用形态计量学技术评估恶性和良性卵巢肿瘤的核长轴(MAJX)和核短轴(MINX)、核面积(NA)、核周长(NP)、核宽高比(NAR)和核圆度(NR)及其变异性,并将其与组织学分级相关联。方法:对8例低级别(LG)、22例高级别(HG)浆液性卵巢癌和30例良性(BG)浆液性卵巢癌的组织学切片采用数字图像形态学测量技术进行形态学参数评价。结果:恶性病例的大小相关核参数MAJX、MINX、NA、NP均值及其变异性显著高于良性病例(P < 0.01),恶性病例的NAR均值及其变异性显著低于良性病例。恶性病例的平均NR显著增高,但其变异性(标准差- NR)显著降低。组织学分级与MAJX (ρ = 0.864)、MINX (ρ = 0.882)、NA (ρ = 0.875)、NP (ρ = 0.859)呈正相关,与NR (ρ = 0.682)呈正相关;与NAR不同(ρ = - 0.794)。除NR外,其余参数均与变异率呈正相关。HG肿瘤中MINX、NA均值均高于对照组(P < 0.05)。对于所有恶性病例:MINX > 5.03µm和NA > 30.44µm 2可100%鉴别良性。结论:恶性肿瘤中与核大小相关的形态学参数及其变异性明显大于良性肿瘤,且与肿瘤分级呈正相关。恶性核比良性核更圆。核形态测定法可以有效地用于卵巢癌的定量诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engineered 3D Cardiovascular Tissue Models Within Dynamic Microfluidic Platforms for Personalized Medicine Applications. Giant cell fibroblastoma a rare chest wall tumor in a 4 years old boy: a case report Arabic gum aracia improves diabetic peripheral neuropathy in rats: Ultrastructural histopathalogical study. Heterogeneous distribution of Retinal Degeneration Protein 3 in normal human fetal tissues: Exploring the possible relevance to neuroblastoma genesis Regulation of pro-inflammatory genes and pathways in neoplastic cervical epithelia pathogenesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1