Bacterial profiling and antibiotic-resistant pattern among cancer patients

Suraksha Sharma, Parbati Thapa Magar, Suchana Achhami, Pradip Hamal, Bipin Chapagain, S. Jaiswal, B. Tiwari
{"title":"Bacterial profiling and antibiotic-resistant pattern among cancer patients","authors":"Suraksha Sharma, Parbati Thapa Magar, Suchana Achhami, Pradip Hamal, Bipin Chapagain, S. Jaiswal, B. Tiwari","doi":"10.51847/qkqoeuw5wi","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to assess the bacterial profile and antibiotic resistance pattern among cancer patients attending B.P Koirala Memorial Cancer Hospital, Bharatpur, Chitwan. Hospital-based cross-sectional studies were carried out on 384 samples collected from cancer patients and were processed. After the growth of the organism on different media, Grams staining was done for primary identification and later identified by biochemical characteristics and was processed for antibiotic susceptibility by Kirby-Bauer method of disk diffusion and was reported sensitive or resistant by measuring zone of inhibition following the CLSI guideline (2020). The collected data were analyzed using SPSS V20.0. Out of 384 participants, 55.4% were male and 44.6% were female. Growth was found in 43.5% of specimens. Hematogenous cancer growth was 40.7% while 45.5% of growth was among non-hematogenous cancer patients. Escherichia coli were reported 38.9%, Klebsiella spp . 20.4%. Pseudomonas spp. 19.2%, Citrobacter spp . with 9.0%, and Acinetobacter spp . with 4.8%. Like-wise Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacter aerogenes contributed 3.6% and 3.0% respectively. Proteus spp and CoNS were 0.6% each. E.coli was found to be highly resistant to Amoxycillin (98.5%), followed by Ciprofloxacin (73.9%) and then Cotrimoxazole (67.7%) while low resistance was found to Amikacin. Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent Gram-positive found to be 100% resistant to Amoxycillin, Ciprofloxacin, Cloxacillin, and Cephalexin i.e; 66.7% each and fully sensitive to Amikacin and Tigecycline. Gram-negative bacteria were more frequently isolated than gram-positive bacteria. Many opportunistic pathogens including MDR strains may readily infect patients with cancer.","PeriodicalId":44457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51847/qkqoeuw5wi","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the bacterial profile and antibiotic resistance pattern among cancer patients attending B.P Koirala Memorial Cancer Hospital, Bharatpur, Chitwan. Hospital-based cross-sectional studies were carried out on 384 samples collected from cancer patients and were processed. After the growth of the organism on different media, Grams staining was done for primary identification and later identified by biochemical characteristics and was processed for antibiotic susceptibility by Kirby-Bauer method of disk diffusion and was reported sensitive or resistant by measuring zone of inhibition following the CLSI guideline (2020). The collected data were analyzed using SPSS V20.0. Out of 384 participants, 55.4% were male and 44.6% were female. Growth was found in 43.5% of specimens. Hematogenous cancer growth was 40.7% while 45.5% of growth was among non-hematogenous cancer patients. Escherichia coli were reported 38.9%, Klebsiella spp . 20.4%. Pseudomonas spp. 19.2%, Citrobacter spp . with 9.0%, and Acinetobacter spp . with 4.8%. Like-wise Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacter aerogenes contributed 3.6% and 3.0% respectively. Proteus spp and CoNS were 0.6% each. E.coli was found to be highly resistant to Amoxycillin (98.5%), followed by Ciprofloxacin (73.9%) and then Cotrimoxazole (67.7%) while low resistance was found to Amikacin. Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent Gram-positive found to be 100% resistant to Amoxycillin, Ciprofloxacin, Cloxacillin, and Cephalexin i.e; 66.7% each and fully sensitive to Amikacin and Tigecycline. Gram-negative bacteria were more frequently isolated than gram-positive bacteria. Many opportunistic pathogens including MDR strains may readily infect patients with cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者的细菌谱和抗生素耐药模式
本研究旨在评估在Chitwan Bharatpur B.P Koirala纪念癌症医院就诊的癌症患者的细菌特征和抗生素耐药模式。以医院为基础的横断面研究对从癌症患者身上收集的384个样本进行了处理。在不同培养基上生长后,进行克氏染色进行初步鉴定,随后进行生化特征鉴定,并通过Kirby-Bauer盘扩散法进行抗生素敏感性处理,并根据CLSI指南(2020)通过测量抑制区报告敏感或耐药。收集的数据采用SPSS V20.0进行分析。在384名参与者中,55.4%为男性,44.6%为女性。43.5%的标本有生长。血液性肿瘤的生长占40.7%,而非血液性肿瘤患者的生长占45.5%。大肠杆菌占38.9%,克雷伯氏菌占38.9%。20.4%。假单胞菌19.2%,柠檬酸杆菌19.2%。为9.0%,不动杆菌属。与4.8%。金黄色葡萄球菌和产气肠杆菌分别占3.6%和3.0%。Proteus spp和con均为0.6%。大肠杆菌对阿莫西林高度耐药(98.5%),其次是环丙沙星(73.9%)和复方新诺明(67.7%),对阿米卡星低耐药。金黄色葡萄球菌是最普遍的革兰氏阳性,对阿莫西林、环丙沙星、氯西林和头孢氨苄100%耐药,即;66.7%,对阿米卡星和替加环素完全敏感。革兰氏阴性菌的分离率高于革兰氏阳性菌。包括耐多药菌株在内的许多机会致病菌很容易感染癌症患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Value of ascitic fluid lipids in the differentiation between cirrhotic and malignant ascites Analysis of Interaction between Twenty-Seven Pyrimidinone Derivatives with XIAP Using a Theoretical Model Methods of Treatment of Hemangiomas Theoretical Evaluation of Twenty-Cannabinoid Derivatives on Either Androgen Receptor or 5α-Reductase Enzyme Pulmonary Carcinosarcoma is a Rare Cancer with a Poor Prognosis – A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1