Comparison of Outcome on Knee Related Function by 2 Different Mode of Progressive Resisted Exercises (PREx) Intervention in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

Swati Meshram, Sandhya Gupta, Medha Deo
{"title":"Comparison of Outcome on Knee Related Function by 2 Different Mode of Progressive Resisted Exercises (PREx) Intervention in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis","authors":"Swati Meshram, Sandhya Gupta, Medha Deo","doi":"10.4172/2167-7921.1000227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Lower limb muscles strengthening are crucial in knee joint rehabilitation. Weight training as evolved by DeLorm is a more traditional robust form of Progressive resistive exercises (PREx) program in which muscles are exercised against constant resistance through the arc of motion. Use of Elastic bands is yet another tool used in strengthening exercise regimens. What popularly known as Theraband exercises, resistance varies through the arc and relies on various components such as modulus of elasticity. The characteristic differences of theses 2 modes of resisted exercise was assumed to result in different outcomes on measured knee related functions. Hence, this study has been undertaken to compare the short term effects PREx using weight cuffs versus Theraband resistance exercise in patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis. \nMethods: Eighty-nine participants completed this trial over the period of 14 months. Study participants were randomly allocated to 3 study groups which received PREx (DeLorm) (n=30), Theraband exercises (n=30) and conventional treatment (n=29) for 3 week period. \nResults: Interaction between time and function was significant when compared with control whereas both experimental groups improved equally (P>0.05) over the period of time. Post treatment Weight cuff (DeLorm) and Theraband PREx between group differences (median difference and probability of superiority (PS) is presented for 5 Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales and patient specific function are as follows. \nPain: 6.5 (36%); symptoms 11(43%); ADL 5.5(45%), Sport and recreation 5(35%), QOL, PSFS 0.75(37%). \nConclusion: Both the weight cuff PREx (DeLorm) and Theraband resistance exercises resulted in improvement of knee functions as measured on KOOS and patient specific functional scale in population suffering from knee osteoarthritis with better probability of superiority for weight cuff exercises.","PeriodicalId":91304,"journal":{"name":"Journal of arthritis","volume":"2016 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of arthritis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-7921.1000227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lower limb muscles strengthening are crucial in knee joint rehabilitation. Weight training as evolved by DeLorm is a more traditional robust form of Progressive resistive exercises (PREx) program in which muscles are exercised against constant resistance through the arc of motion. Use of Elastic bands is yet another tool used in strengthening exercise regimens. What popularly known as Theraband exercises, resistance varies through the arc and relies on various components such as modulus of elasticity. The characteristic differences of theses 2 modes of resisted exercise was assumed to result in different outcomes on measured knee related functions. Hence, this study has been undertaken to compare the short term effects PREx using weight cuffs versus Theraband resistance exercise in patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis. Methods: Eighty-nine participants completed this trial over the period of 14 months. Study participants were randomly allocated to 3 study groups which received PREx (DeLorm) (n=30), Theraband exercises (n=30) and conventional treatment (n=29) for 3 week period. Results: Interaction between time and function was significant when compared with control whereas both experimental groups improved equally (P>0.05) over the period of time. Post treatment Weight cuff (DeLorm) and Theraband PREx between group differences (median difference and probability of superiority (PS) is presented for 5 Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales and patient specific function are as follows. Pain: 6.5 (36%); symptoms 11(43%); ADL 5.5(45%), Sport and recreation 5(35%), QOL, PSFS 0.75(37%). Conclusion: Both the weight cuff PREx (DeLorm) and Theraband resistance exercises resulted in improvement of knee functions as measured on KOOS and patient specific functional scale in population suffering from knee osteoarthritis with better probability of superiority for weight cuff exercises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种不同模式进行性抵抗运动(PREx)干预对膝关节骨性关节炎患者膝关节相关功能影响的比较
背景:下肢肌肉强化是膝关节康复的关键。由DeLorm发展而来的重量训练是一种更传统的强健形式的渐进式阻力练习(PREx)计划,在该计划中,肌肉通过运动弧线来对抗持续的阻力。使用橡皮筋是加强锻炼的另一种方法。通常被称为Theraband练习,阻力在弧线上变化,依赖于各种成分,如弹性模量。假设这两种抵抗运动模式的特征差异导致测量的膝关节相关功能的不同结果。因此,本研究进行了比较PREx使用重量袖带和Theraband阻力运动对膝关节骨关节炎患者的短期效果。方法:89名参与者在14个月的时间里完成了这项试验。研究参与者被随机分为3个研究组,分别接受PREx (DeLorm) (n=30)、Theraband运动(n=30)和常规治疗(n=29),为期3周。结果:与对照组相比,时间与功能之间的交互作用显著,而两个实验组随着时间的推移均有相同的改善(P < 0.05)。治疗后体重袖带(DeLorm)和Theraband PREx在5个膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)亚量表上的组间差异(中位数差异和优势概率(PS)),患者特异性功能如下。疼痛:6.5分(36%);症状11 (43%);ADL 5.5(45%),运动和娱乐5(35%),生活质量,PSFS 0.75(37%)。结论:重量袖带PREx (DeLorm)和Theraband阻力训练均能改善膝关节功能(KOOS和患者特异性功能量表),在膝关节骨性关节炎患者中,重量袖带训练的优势概率更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ophthalmologic Manifestations Arthritis Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation Epicondyle a n d Apophysitis Methods in rehabilitation Rheumatoid Arthritis: Chronic Inflammatory Autoimmune Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1