A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of the Postoperative Administration of Tramadol and Morphine following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Shigemi Matsumoto, Kazu Matsumoto, H. Ogawa, K. Nagase, K. Tanabe, Haruhiko Akiyama, H. Iida
{"title":"A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of the Postoperative Administration of Tramadol and Morphine following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty","authors":"Shigemi Matsumoto, Kazu Matsumoto, H. Ogawa, K. Nagase, K. Tanabe, Haruhiko Akiyama, H. Iida","doi":"10.4172/2167-7921.1000274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Different techniques and medications are used to achieve pain relief and early mobilization after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the relationship between subacute postoperative pain and early functional recovery remains to be fully resolved. We examined the effects of low-dose tramadol, and morphine on subacute postoperative pain management with NSAID in patients after TKA. Hypothesis: The low-dose tramadol combined with NSAIDs are effective for subacute postoperative pain in TKA. Methods: We prospectively studied 81 patients who underwent primary TKA. Before surgery, we randomly assigned participating patients into one of three treatment groups; Group NSAID, Group Tramadol, or Group Morphine. The postoperative pain intensity was measured and recorded by physical therapists with a visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest (rVAS) and during movement (mVAS) on the day before surgery, and on postoperative days (PODs) 3, 7 and 14. The lower leg functional recovery was also evaluated by the range of motion (ROM) of the knee, and the quadriceps muscle strength (% muscle strength). Results: Twenty-two patients from each group completed the study. The mean rVAS scores of the groups showed no significant differences between throughout the postoperative period. The mean mVAS scores showed no differences on PODs 7, 10, and 14. However, the mVAS scores of Group Tramadol were significantly lower than those of Group NSAID on POD 3 (p=0.0216). No significant differences were found among the groups in ROM or % muscle strength. The incidence of constipation in Group Morphine was significantly higher than that in Group NSAID (p=0.0026). Conclusion: Tramadol 100mg/day was effective for postoperative pain management, especially in the first week after TKA. Level of Evidence: Level II, low-powered prospective randomized trial.","PeriodicalId":91304,"journal":{"name":"Journal of arthritis","volume":"07 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2167-7921.1000274","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of arthritis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-7921.1000274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Different techniques and medications are used to achieve pain relief and early mobilization after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the relationship between subacute postoperative pain and early functional recovery remains to be fully resolved. We examined the effects of low-dose tramadol, and morphine on subacute postoperative pain management with NSAID in patients after TKA. Hypothesis: The low-dose tramadol combined with NSAIDs are effective for subacute postoperative pain in TKA. Methods: We prospectively studied 81 patients who underwent primary TKA. Before surgery, we randomly assigned participating patients into one of three treatment groups; Group NSAID, Group Tramadol, or Group Morphine. The postoperative pain intensity was measured and recorded by physical therapists with a visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest (rVAS) and during movement (mVAS) on the day before surgery, and on postoperative days (PODs) 3, 7 and 14. The lower leg functional recovery was also evaluated by the range of motion (ROM) of the knee, and the quadriceps muscle strength (% muscle strength). Results: Twenty-two patients from each group completed the study. The mean rVAS scores of the groups showed no significant differences between throughout the postoperative period. The mean mVAS scores showed no differences on PODs 7, 10, and 14. However, the mVAS scores of Group Tramadol were significantly lower than those of Group NSAID on POD 3 (p=0.0216). No significant differences were found among the groups in ROM or % muscle strength. The incidence of constipation in Group Morphine was significantly higher than that in Group NSAID (p=0.0026). Conclusion: Tramadol 100mg/day was effective for postoperative pain management, especially in the first week after TKA. Level of Evidence: Level II, low-powered prospective randomized trial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首次全膝关节置换术后曲马多和吗啡给药的前瞻性随机比较
背景:不同的技术和药物用于全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的疼痛缓解和早期活动。然而,亚急性术后疼痛与早期功能恢复之间的关系仍有待完全解决。我们研究了低剂量曲马多和吗啡对TKA后患者使用非甾体抗炎药治疗亚急性术后疼痛的影响。假设:小剂量曲马多联合非甾体抗炎药治疗TKA术后亚急性疼痛有效。方法:对81例原发性TKA患者进行前瞻性研究。在手术前,我们将参与治疗的患者随机分为三个治疗组;非甾体抗炎药组,曲马多组,吗啡组。术后疼痛强度由物理治疗师在手术前、术后第3、7、14天(pod)静息(rVAS)和运动(mVAS)时用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量和记录。下肢功能恢复也通过膝关节活动度(ROM)和股四头肌肌力(%肌力)来评估。结果:两组共22例患者完成研究。两组术后rVAS平均评分差异无统计学意义。在pod 7、10和14上,平均mVAS评分没有差异。而曲马多组在POD 3上的mVAS评分显著低于非甾体抗炎药组(p=0.0216)。各组间ROM和%肌力无显著差异。吗啡组便秘发生率显著高于非甾体抗炎药组(p=0.0026)。结论:曲马多100mg/天对TKA术后疼痛的控制是有效的,尤其是在TKA术后1周。证据等级:二级,低强度前瞻性随机试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ophthalmologic Manifestations Arthritis Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation Epicondyle a n d Apophysitis Methods in rehabilitation Rheumatoid Arthritis: Chronic Inflammatory Autoimmune Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1