The Use of the "Ancient Unity" in the Historiography of the Moravian Church

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Journal of Moravian History Pub Date : 2013-11-20 DOI:10.5325/JMORAHIST.13.2.0109
Craig D. Atwood
{"title":"The Use of the \"Ancient Unity\" in the Historiography of the Moravian Church","authors":"Craig D. Atwood","doi":"10.5325/JMORAHIST.13.2.0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines how Moravians in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries interpreted the (Bohemian) Unity of the Brethren and the relationship of that church to the Moravian Church, founded in Herrnhut, Germany, in the eighteenth century. Zinzendorf and his contemporaries used the Unity of the Brethren to legitimate the discipline, ministerial orders, and ecumenical endeavors of the Moravian Church. After a brief look at German-Moravian historiography in the nineteenth century, particularly the development of the myth of the \"Hidden Seed,\" we will examine in detail how Moravians in England and North America used the concept of the Ancient Unity to create an American Moravian Church independent of German control. Church historians like Edmund de Schweinitz tried to look past Herrnhut to claim the identity of the Bohemian Brethren as the true identity of the Unitas Fratrum. Ironically, English and American Moravians adopted very little of the doctrine and practice of the Unity of the Brethren even as they claimed the history of that church. In fact, by the time of de Schweinitz the Moravians had abandoned controversial aspects of the church that most clearly connected the Bohemian Brethren to the renewed church, such as pacifism and the refusal to swear oaths.","PeriodicalId":40312,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moravian History","volume":"13 1","pages":"109 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5325/JMORAHIST.13.2.0109","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Moravian History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JMORAHIST.13.2.0109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article examines how Moravians in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries interpreted the (Bohemian) Unity of the Brethren and the relationship of that church to the Moravian Church, founded in Herrnhut, Germany, in the eighteenth century. Zinzendorf and his contemporaries used the Unity of the Brethren to legitimate the discipline, ministerial orders, and ecumenical endeavors of the Moravian Church. After a brief look at German-Moravian historiography in the nineteenth century, particularly the development of the myth of the "Hidden Seed," we will examine in detail how Moravians in England and North America used the concept of the Ancient Unity to create an American Moravian Church independent of German control. Church historians like Edmund de Schweinitz tried to look past Herrnhut to claim the identity of the Bohemian Brethren as the true identity of the Unitas Fratrum. Ironically, English and American Moravians adopted very little of the doctrine and practice of the Unity of the Brethren even as they claimed the history of that church. In fact, by the time of de Schweinitz the Moravians had abandoned controversial aspects of the church that most clearly connected the Bohemian Brethren to the renewed church, such as pacifism and the refusal to swear oaths.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“古代统一”在摩拉维亚教会史学中的运用
这篇文章探讨了摩拉维亚人如何在十八和十九世纪解释(波西米亚)团结的兄弟和该教会的关系摩拉维亚教会,建立在Herrnhut,德国,在十八世纪。津尊多夫和他的同时代人利用“弟兄合一”使摩拉维亚教会的纪律、牧师的命令和大公合一的努力合法化。在简要介绍了19世纪德国摩拉维亚人的历史编纂,特别是“隐藏的种子”神话的发展之后,我们将详细研究英国和北美的摩拉维亚人是如何利用“古代统一”的概念来创建一个独立于德国控制的美国摩拉维亚教会的。埃德蒙德·德·施韦尼茨等教会历史学家试图超越赫恩胡特,声称波西米亚兄弟会的身份是统一兄弟会的真正身份。具有讽刺意味的是,英国和美国的摩拉维亚人几乎没有采纳“弟兄合一”的教义和实践,尽管他们声称拥有该教会的历史。事实上,到施韦尼茨的时候,摩拉维亚人已经放弃了教会中有争议的方面,比如和平主义和拒绝宣誓,这些方面最明显地将波西米亚兄弟会与复兴的教会联系在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Missionaries and Modernity: Education in the British Empire, 1830–1910 Babel of the Atlantic Peter Boehler’s Universalist Letter Spangenberg’s 1760 Letter about Slaveholding in St. Thomas and Bethlehem Slavery in Bethlehem: Difference and Indifference in Northampton County’s Moravian Settlements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1