The Masculinity of Christ according to Zinzendorf: Evidence and Interpretation

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Journal of Moravian History Pub Date : 2015-11-18 DOI:10.5325/JMORAHIST.15.2.0097
Peter T. Vogt
{"title":"The Masculinity of Christ according to Zinzendorf: Evidence and Interpretation","authors":"Peter T. Vogt","doi":"10.5325/JMORAHIST.15.2.0097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the question of evidence and interpretation in relation to Zinzendorf’s view of Christ’s masculinity. The point of departure is the debate about Fogelman’s thesis that eighteenth-century Moravians believed in a female Jesus. This debate has made clear that the Moravian view of Jesus included female aspects, which are especially linked to the notion of maternal tenderness and the symbolism of the side-wound as birth organ. Generally, however, Zinzendorf’s view of Christ is marked by a strong emphasis on masculinity, associated with Jesus’ male body and his role as heavenly bridegroom. A close reading of the sources suggests that Zinzendorf possessed a comprehensive and coherent theological understanding of Christ’s masculinity that can be described as paradigm of masculinity. For this reason, the interpretation of Zinzendorf’s Christology in terms of androgyny is problematic. The presence of female attributes in Moravian Christology express the pastoral intent to show that the redemptive power of Christ transcends the lines of gender.","PeriodicalId":40312,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moravian History","volume":"15 1","pages":"135 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5325/JMORAHIST.15.2.0097","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Moravian History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JMORAHIST.15.2.0097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the question of evidence and interpretation in relation to Zinzendorf’s view of Christ’s masculinity. The point of departure is the debate about Fogelman’s thesis that eighteenth-century Moravians believed in a female Jesus. This debate has made clear that the Moravian view of Jesus included female aspects, which are especially linked to the notion of maternal tenderness and the symbolism of the side-wound as birth organ. Generally, however, Zinzendorf’s view of Christ is marked by a strong emphasis on masculinity, associated with Jesus’ male body and his role as heavenly bridegroom. A close reading of the sources suggests that Zinzendorf possessed a comprehensive and coherent theological understanding of Christ’s masculinity that can be described as paradigm of masculinity. For this reason, the interpretation of Zinzendorf’s Christology in terms of androgyny is problematic. The presence of female attributes in Moravian Christology express the pastoral intent to show that the redemptive power of Christ transcends the lines of gender.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
津尊多夫认为基督的阳刚之气:证据与解释
本文探讨了与津尊多夫关于基督男子气概的观点有关的证据和解释问题。出发点是关于福格尔曼关于18世纪摩拉维亚人相信女性耶稣的论点的争论。这场辩论清楚地表明,摩拉维亚人对耶稣的看法包括了女性方面,这尤其与母性温柔的概念和侧面伤口作为分娩器官的象征意义有关。然而,总的来说,津尊多夫对基督的看法以强烈强调男子气概为标志,与耶稣的男性身体和他作为天堂新郎的角色联系在一起。对这些资料的仔细阅读表明,津尊多夫对基督的男子气概有着全面而连贯的神学理解,可以被描述为男子气概的典范。因此,从雌雄同体的角度来解释津尊多夫的基督论是有问题的。在摩拉维亚基督论中,女性属性的存在表达了牧师的意图,表明基督的救赎力量超越了性别的界限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Missionaries and Modernity: Education in the British Empire, 1830–1910 Babel of the Atlantic Peter Boehler’s Universalist Letter Spangenberg’s 1760 Letter about Slaveholding in St. Thomas and Bethlehem Slavery in Bethlehem: Difference and Indifference in Northampton County’s Moravian Settlements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1