About the subtle and the manifest in the ATLG scale

José Moral de la Rubia , Adrian Valle de la O
{"title":"About the subtle and the manifest in the ATLG scale","authors":"José Moral de la Rubia ,&nbsp;Adrian Valle de la O","doi":"10.5460/jbhsi.v5.2.42303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aims of this paper were to calculate internal consistency of the Attitude toward Lesbian and Gay Men (ATLG) scale, to determine its factor structure, and to verify the equivalence of the factor structure pattern by gender. An incidental sample of 452 undergraduate students was collected. Internal consistency of its 20 items was high (alpha = .94). It was defined a solution of three factors nested to one general factor: one factor related to an attitude of rejection toward lesbians (ATL), another factor related to an attitude of open rejection toward gay men (ATG-Open), and a third factor related to an attitude of subtle rejection toward gay men (ATG-Subtle). The three factors had high values of internal consistency (.91, .84, and .79, respectively). This factor model showed an adequate data ft (Chi-square/df = 2.38, RMSEA = .05, GFI = .91, and AGFI = .90), and resulted valid for men and women in the multigroup contrast (Chi-square/<em>df</em> = 1.80, RMSEA = .04, GFI = .87, and AGFI = .83). Nevertheless, the 20-item ATLG scale could be reduced to the 5 items composing the ATG-Subtle factor owing to the extremely strong weights that the general factor had on its three nested factors and the low risk of underestimation of the actual attitudinal rejection that this reduction conveys. It is recommended the use of the ATLG scale with its 20 items in Mexico, and its study in other Spanish-speaking countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 103-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5460/jbhsi.v5.2.42303","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007078013716912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The aims of this paper were to calculate internal consistency of the Attitude toward Lesbian and Gay Men (ATLG) scale, to determine its factor structure, and to verify the equivalence of the factor structure pattern by gender. An incidental sample of 452 undergraduate students was collected. Internal consistency of its 20 items was high (alpha = .94). It was defined a solution of three factors nested to one general factor: one factor related to an attitude of rejection toward lesbians (ATL), another factor related to an attitude of open rejection toward gay men (ATG-Open), and a third factor related to an attitude of subtle rejection toward gay men (ATG-Subtle). The three factors had high values of internal consistency (.91, .84, and .79, respectively). This factor model showed an adequate data ft (Chi-square/df = 2.38, RMSEA = .05, GFI = .91, and AGFI = .90), and resulted valid for men and women in the multigroup contrast (Chi-square/df = 1.80, RMSEA = .04, GFI = .87, and AGFI = .83). Nevertheless, the 20-item ATLG scale could be reduced to the 5 items composing the ATG-Subtle factor owing to the extremely strong weights that the general factor had on its three nested factors and the low risk of underestimation of the actual attitudinal rejection that this reduction conveys. It is recommended the use of the ATLG scale with its 20 items in Mexico, and its study in other Spanish-speaking countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于ATLG量表中细微的和明显的
本研究旨在计算男女同性恋态度量表的内部一致性,确定其因子结构,并验证因子结构模式在性别上的等价性。随机抽样452名本科生。20个条目的内部一致性较高(alpha = 0.94)。它被定义为嵌套在一个一般因素上的三个因素的解决方案:一个因素与对女同性恋的拒绝态度有关(ATL),另一个因素与对男同性恋的公开拒绝态度有关(ATG-Open),第三个因素与对男同性恋的微妙拒绝态度有关(atg -微妙)。三个因素具有较高的内部一致性值。分别为91、0.84和0.79)。该因子模型显示了足够的数据ft(卡方/df = 2.38, RMSEA = 0.05, GFI = 0.91, AGFI = 0.90),并且结果在多组对比中对男性和女性有效(卡方/df = 1.80, RMSEA = 0.04, GFI = 0.87, AGFI = 0.83)。然而,由于一般因素对其三个嵌套因素具有极强的权重,并且这种减少所传达的对实际态度拒绝的低估风险很低,因此,20项ATLG量表可以减少到组成atg微妙因素的5项。建议在墨西哥使用包含20个项目的ATLG量表,并在其他西班牙语国家进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Propiedades psicométricas de una escala de autoeficacia percibida para el uso correcto del condón en jóvenes universitarios Propiedades psicométricas de la versión corta de la escala de Empoderamiento y Agencia Personal en estudiantes universitarios. Resiliencia, recursos familiares y espirituales en cuidadores de niños con discapacidad What factors are related to self-perceived health? The relationship between Sense of Coherence, behaviors and health on Peruvian emerging adults Deseo sexual en jóvenes de la Ciudad de México: amor vs. placer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1