Differences of Mice Gut Microbiota between SPF and Clean Environment

Yingying Su, Xiaomeng Ren, Yuan Li, W. Song
{"title":"Differences of Mice Gut Microbiota between SPF and Clean Environment","authors":"Yingying Su, Xiaomeng Ren, Yuan Li, W. Song","doi":"10.4172/2168-958X.1000134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Compare the difference of intestinal microbiota between Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) mice andclean environment mice. Methods: Twelve mice were divided into two groups. One group is Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) mice, anotheris clean environment mice. The stool samples were collected for nine and eighteen days both in SPF and cleanenvironment, and the total DNA was extracted. PCR-DGGE technology were used to obtain microbial florafingerprint, Quantity one software were used to build phylogenetic tree, the similarity and diversity of the map can beused for analysis, differential bands were selected for sequencing. Results: Under the conditions of SPF, the intestinal microbiota of mice were significantly different (p<0.05) fromthat of the clean grade, and the Enterobacteria were specific in SPF mice. With the passage of time, Lactobacilluswere decreased in SPF mice. Conclusion: Differences exist in intestinal microbiota of mice under different feeding conditions.","PeriodicalId":92404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of glycobiology","volume":"7 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of glycobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-958X.1000134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Compare the difference of intestinal microbiota between Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) mice andclean environment mice. Methods: Twelve mice were divided into two groups. One group is Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) mice, anotheris clean environment mice. The stool samples were collected for nine and eighteen days both in SPF and cleanenvironment, and the total DNA was extracted. PCR-DGGE technology were used to obtain microbial florafingerprint, Quantity one software were used to build phylogenetic tree, the similarity and diversity of the map can beused for analysis, differential bands were selected for sequencing. Results: Under the conditions of SPF, the intestinal microbiota of mice were significantly different (p<0.05) fromthat of the clean grade, and the Enterobacteria were specific in SPF mice. With the passage of time, Lactobacilluswere decreased in SPF mice. Conclusion: Differences exist in intestinal microbiota of mice under different feeding conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SPF与清洁环境小鼠肠道菌群的差异
目的:比较SPF小鼠与清洁环境小鼠肠道菌群的差异。方法:将12只小鼠分为两组。一组为无特定病原体(SPF)小鼠,另一组为清洁环境小鼠。在SPF和清洁环境下分别收集粪便样品9天和18天,提取总DNA。采用PCR-DGGE技术获取微生物花指纹图谱,采用Quantity one软件构建系统发育树,图谱相似性和多样性可用于分析,选择差异条带进行测序。结果:SPF级条件下,小鼠肠道菌群与清洁级相比有显著差异(p<0.05),且SPF级小鼠肠道菌群具有特异性。随着时间的推移,SPF小鼠乳酸杆菌数量减少。结论:不同饲养条件下小鼠肠道菌群存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hyaluronic acid and its benefits Glycomics & Infection Markers Lectin and Its Function Long Linear Polysaccharides with Repeating Disaccharide Units Short Note on Glycosyltransferases andSialytransferases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1