Ferramentas para avaliação da sustentabilidade nas operações de serviço em instituições de ensino superior

IF 0.4 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Revista de Gestao Ambiental e Sustentabilidade-GeAS Pub Date : 2020-05-06 DOI:10.5585/geas.v9i1.17156
Alfred Douglas Drahein, Edson Pinheiro de Lima, S. Costa
{"title":"Ferramentas para avaliação da sustentabilidade nas operações de serviço em instituições de ensino superior","authors":"Alfred Douglas Drahein, Edson Pinheiro de Lima, S. Costa","doi":"10.5585/geas.v9i1.17156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study’s goal: The general goal of this paper is to create a conceptual framework that allows for the assessment of sustainability practices in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Methodology/approach: In order to meet the goal set, a systematic survey of the scientific literature about sustainability assessment models in HEIs was conducted, which allowed for the identification of characteristics and functionalities of the existent models. The systematic literature review developed adopts the Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist (ProKnow-C) method complemented by a procedure known as snowball sampling to create a portfolio of articles to be reviewed. Originality/Relevance: This paper reviews a considerable number of sustainability assessment models for higher education, identifying correlated axes in existent models and contributing to further research about the theme of sustainability assessment in higher education. Main results: The results generated a summary chart composed of 10 thematic axes that describe sustainable operations in HEIs. They are as follows: governance and policy, laws, ethics and integrity, teaching, purchases, transportation, energy, water, food, innovation, and hazardous waste. Theoretical/methodological contributions : This paper is based on the literature review, particularly adopting systematic review techniques. Conclusion: The systematic survey of scientific literature generated a summary chart composed of 10 thematic axes. This paper is limited to ascertaining the thematic areas that may develop criteria to assess service operations in HEIs. The thematic axes found by this paper may be employed by future studies to obtain specific criteria and their applicability in HEIs.","PeriodicalId":42069,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestao Ambiental e Sustentabilidade-GeAS","volume":"39 1","pages":"17156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestao Ambiental e Sustentabilidade-GeAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/geas.v9i1.17156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Study’s goal: The general goal of this paper is to create a conceptual framework that allows for the assessment of sustainability practices in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Methodology/approach: In order to meet the goal set, a systematic survey of the scientific literature about sustainability assessment models in HEIs was conducted, which allowed for the identification of characteristics and functionalities of the existent models. The systematic literature review developed adopts the Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist (ProKnow-C) method complemented by a procedure known as snowball sampling to create a portfolio of articles to be reviewed. Originality/Relevance: This paper reviews a considerable number of sustainability assessment models for higher education, identifying correlated axes in existent models and contributing to further research about the theme of sustainability assessment in higher education. Main results: The results generated a summary chart composed of 10 thematic axes that describe sustainable operations in HEIs. They are as follows: governance and policy, laws, ethics and integrity, teaching, purchases, transportation, energy, water, food, innovation, and hazardous waste. Theoretical/methodological contributions : This paper is based on the literature review, particularly adopting systematic review techniques. Conclusion: The systematic survey of scientific literature generated a summary chart composed of 10 thematic axes. This paper is limited to ascertaining the thematic areas that may develop criteria to assess service operations in HEIs. The thematic axes found by this paper may be employed by future studies to obtain specific criteria and their applicability in HEIs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估高等教育机构服务运营可持续性的工具
研究目标:本文的总体目标是创建一个概念性框架,以便对高等教育机构(HEIs)的可持续性实践进行评估。方法/方法:为了实现既定目标,对高等学校可持续发展评估模型的科学文献进行了系统的调查,从而确定了现有模型的特点和功能。系统的文献综述采用知识发展过程-建构主义(ProKnow-C)方法,辅以滚雪球抽样的程序来创建要审查的文章组合。独创性/相关性:本文回顾了大量的高等教育可持续发展评估模型,找出了现有模型中的关联轴,为进一步研究高等教育可持续发展评估这一主题做出了贡献。主要结果:结果生成了一个由10个主题轴组成的摘要图表,这些主题轴描述了高等教育机构的可持续运作。它们是:治理和政策、法律、道德和诚信、教学、采购、交通、能源、水、食品、创新和危险废物。理论/方法贡献:本文以文献综述为基础,特别采用了系统综述技术。结论:通过对科学文献的系统调查,得出了由10个主题轴组成的总结图。本文件仅限于确定可发展准则以评估高等教育机构服务运作的专题范畴。本文发现的主题轴可以在未来的研究中使用,以获得具体的标准及其在高等学校中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Avaliação da gestão de resíduos sólidos no Município de Guarujá – SP: Cidade boa para turista é cidade boa para seu morador: A vulnerabilidade socioambiental a desastres: Antecedentes da arborização urbana à caminhabilidade: Análise térmica comparativa entre uma casa convencional e uma casa com ventilação natural
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1