Quality assessment of fresh meat cuts as a performance indicator of knives specifically adapted for robot-assisted operations

Helle Røer, O. Korostynska, F. Bjerke, D. Romanov, L. E. Cordova-Lopez, A. Mason, Per Håkon Bjørnstad, T. T. Håseth, O. Alvseike
{"title":"Quality assessment of fresh meat cuts as a performance indicator of knives specifically adapted for robot-assisted operations","authors":"Helle Røer, O. Korostynska, F. Bjerke, D. Romanov, L. E. Cordova-Lopez, A. Mason, Per Håkon Bjørnstad, T. T. Håseth, O. Alvseike","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2023.1.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manual labour in slaughterhouses is hazardous work. Workers suffer from injuries and occupational illnesses resulting from repetitive movements with sharp knives. There is a need for a robotic tool which can perform versatile tasks with a high level of precision. This knife must be able to imitate the same primary cuttings of a professional butcher and produce meat products which are acceptable to the end-market. This paper reports the results of a world-wide assessment of the fresh pork meat cuts as a performance indicator of knives specifically adapted for automated operation. These knives included Victorinox knife, bespoke double bladed Uddeholm knife, vibrating knife and novel smart knife with built-in sensing mechanism that detects in real time the contact with meat and cut depth. Physical appearances of cuts were assessed anonymously by independent responders with different backgrounds. All knives were deemed acceptable in terms of cutting quality. There was also no discernible difference of opinion between manual and robot cuts. This indicates that the new knife for robot-assisted cutting is acceptable by market.","PeriodicalId":30205,"journal":{"name":"Management Science Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2023.1.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Manual labour in slaughterhouses is hazardous work. Workers suffer from injuries and occupational illnesses resulting from repetitive movements with sharp knives. There is a need for a robotic tool which can perform versatile tasks with a high level of precision. This knife must be able to imitate the same primary cuttings of a professional butcher and produce meat products which are acceptable to the end-market. This paper reports the results of a world-wide assessment of the fresh pork meat cuts as a performance indicator of knives specifically adapted for automated operation. These knives included Victorinox knife, bespoke double bladed Uddeholm knife, vibrating knife and novel smart knife with built-in sensing mechanism that detects in real time the contact with meat and cut depth. Physical appearances of cuts were assessed anonymously by independent responders with different backgrounds. All knives were deemed acceptable in terms of cutting quality. There was also no discernible difference of opinion between manual and robot cuts. This indicates that the new knife for robot-assisted cutting is acceptable by market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鲜肉切块的质量评估,作为专门用于机器人辅助操作的刀具的性能指标
屠宰场的体力劳动是危险的工作。工人因反复使用锋利的刀具而受伤和患上职业病。需要一种机器人工具,它可以高精度地执行多功能任务。这把刀必须能够模仿相同的初级切割的专业屠夫和生产的肉类产品是可以接受的终端市场。本文报告了一项全球范围内对新鲜猪肉切割的评估结果,该评估是专门用于自动化操作的刀具的性能指标。这些刀包括维氏刀,定制双刃乌德霍尔姆刀,振动刀和新颖的智能刀,内置传感机制,实时检测与肉的接触和切割深度。割伤的外观由不同背景的独立应答者匿名评估。就切割质量而言,所有刀具都被认为是可以接受的。手工和机器人切割之间也没有明显的意见差异。这表明新型的机器人辅助切割刀是可以被市场接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Management Science Letters is a peer reviewed, monthly publication dedicated to create a forum for scientists in all over the world who wish to share their experiences and knowledge in the field of management skills in the form of original, high quality and value added articles. The journal''s policy is to perform a peer review on all submitted articles and the papers will be appeared in a form of online on our website as soon as the review result becomes positive. The journal covers both empirical and theoretical aspects of management and gives the chance on sharing knowledge among practitioners. Management Science Letters is dedicated for publishing in the following areas: • Quality Management • Production Management (Scheduling, Production management, etc.) • Total Quality Management (TQM) • Six Sigma • Production Efficiency • Just in Time Inventory • Data Envelopment Analysis • Balanced Score Card • Activity Based Cost (ABC) • Technology Acceptance Model • Marketing planning and Customer Relationship Management • Critical Success Factors • e-learning • Customer satisfaction, Job satisfaction, Job turnover, • Organizational commitment, Employee Commitment • Knowledge Management • Knowledge sharing • Human Resources Management (Employee training, Employee Performance, Work achievements,) • Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) issues and Economic development • Innovation, Creativity, Productivity and Performance • Multi-Criteria Decision Making Applications in Management Science (AHP, BWM, TOPSIS, …) • Education Management, Social development, Public Policy • Tourism Industry, Tourism promotion, Tourism directorates • Business performance and financial performance
期刊最新文献
Expressive suppression as an emotion regulation technique and its potential impact on perceived stress The mediating effect of TQM practices on the relationship between strategic planning and productivity Optimization of overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) factors: Case study of a vegetable oil manufacturing company Total quality management tools and techniques for improving service quality and client satisfaction in the healthcare environment: A qualitative systematic review Facilitators of modularity in healthcare services: An interpretive structural modeling approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1