Thomas Mores Utopia als Philosophie: Plädoyer für eine dialogische Lesart

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5771/9783495999967-3
T. Jeschke
{"title":"Thomas Mores Utopia als Philosophie: Plädoyer für eine dialogische Lesart","authors":"T. Jeschke","doi":"10.5771/9783495999967-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Thomas More’s Utopia is an iridescent and enigmatic work which evades a consistent interpretation. Throughout the entire dialogue, many contradictory positions are argued for, and More’s play with telling names makes it difficult to determine which person’s position we should embrace. In order to evade these problems, the paper suggests reading More’s work as a philosophical dialogue with the reader, in which More invites us to evaluate the different positions contained in the work against our own back- ground. In this sense, More’s Utopia is a proper piece of philosophy.","PeriodicalId":42095,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHISCHES JAHRBUCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783495999967-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Thomas More’s Utopia is an iridescent and enigmatic work which evades a consistent interpretation. Throughout the entire dialogue, many contradictory positions are argued for, and More’s play with telling names makes it difficult to determine which person’s position we should embrace. In order to evade these problems, the paper suggests reading More’s work as a philosophical dialogue with the reader, in which More invites us to evaluate the different positions contained in the work against our own back- ground. In this sense, More’s Utopia is a proper piece of philosophy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
托马斯。莫里斯
摘要托马斯·莫尔的《乌托邦》是一部绚丽而神秘的作品,它回避了一致的解释。在整个对话中,许多相互矛盾的立场被争论,莫尔对名字的叙述使我们很难确定我们应该接受哪一个人的立场。为了避免这些问题,本文建议将莫尔的作品作为一种与读者的哲学对话来阅读,莫尔邀请我们在我们自己的背景下评估作品中包含的不同立场。从这个意义上说,莫尔的《乌托邦》是一部恰当的哲学作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Rainer Enskat, Urteil und Erfahrung. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. Zweiter Teil The information society: cause for a philosophical paradigm shift? A response to Luciano Floridi Out of the Box – into the Green and the Blue. Comments on a Post-humanist Information Society Reflections on Floridi’s “The Green and the Blue: A New Political Ontology for a Mature Information Society” Are philosophical questions open? Some thoughts about Luciano Floridi’s conception of philosophy as conceptual design and his new political ontology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1