{"title":"Clinical efficacy and safety of folic acid and vitamin B12 for the adjuvant treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kai Niu, Ximin Zhao, Ying Wei, Yuefeng Wang","doi":"10.54817/ic.v64n3a12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the different effects of folate and vitamin B12 on the ad-juvant treatment of schizophrenia (SCH), their efficacy and safety as adjuvant therapies for SCH were systematically evaluated by evidence-based medicine. Publication retrieval was performed using authoritative databases such as the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science to screen randomized con-trolled trials (RCTs). After the quality evaluation and data extraction of includ-ed studies, eligible RCTs were systematically reviewed using Review Manager 5.2 software. In total, 14 RCTs were included. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that as the adjuvant therapy for SCH, vitamin B12 differed significantly from folate in terms of anxiety relief rate [odds ratio (OR)=1.28, 95% con-fidence interval (CI) (1.02, 1.61), p=0.03, I2 =0%, Z=2.13]. However, there were no significant differences in the incidence rate of mania [OR=1.13, 95% CI (0.78,1.65), p=0.65, I2=36%, Z=0.65], total efficacy [OR=1.06, 95% CI (0.72, 1.56), p=0.77, I2=0%, Z=0.30] and incidence rate of adverse reactions [OR=1.15, 95% CI (0.88, 1.49), p=0.31, I2=0%, Z=1.03]. Although folate and vitamin B12 exhibit no significant differences in the adjuvant treatment of SCH, vitamin B12 exerts markedly fewer side effects than folate drugs, and it is of de-terminant significance for the clinical adjuvant medication of SCH.","PeriodicalId":14514,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion clinica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion clinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54817/ic.v64n3a12","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Given the different effects of folate and vitamin B12 on the ad-juvant treatment of schizophrenia (SCH), their efficacy and safety as adjuvant therapies for SCH were systematically evaluated by evidence-based medicine. Publication retrieval was performed using authoritative databases such as the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science to screen randomized con-trolled trials (RCTs). After the quality evaluation and data extraction of includ-ed studies, eligible RCTs were systematically reviewed using Review Manager 5.2 software. In total, 14 RCTs were included. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that as the adjuvant therapy for SCH, vitamin B12 differed significantly from folate in terms of anxiety relief rate [odds ratio (OR)=1.28, 95% con-fidence interval (CI) (1.02, 1.61), p=0.03, I2 =0%, Z=2.13]. However, there were no significant differences in the incidence rate of mania [OR=1.13, 95% CI (0.78,1.65), p=0.65, I2=36%, Z=0.65], total efficacy [OR=1.06, 95% CI (0.72, 1.56), p=0.77, I2=0%, Z=0.30] and incidence rate of adverse reactions [OR=1.15, 95% CI (0.88, 1.49), p=0.31, I2=0%, Z=1.03]. Although folate and vitamin B12 exhibit no significant differences in the adjuvant treatment of SCH, vitamin B12 exerts markedly fewer side effects than folate drugs, and it is of de-terminant significance for the clinical adjuvant medication of SCH.