Protecting Autonomy and Dignity in Organ Donation Postmortem through Family Decision Making

Paul Riffon
{"title":"Protecting Autonomy and Dignity in Organ Donation Postmortem through Family Decision Making","authors":"Paul Riffon","doi":"10.5840/ncbq202121226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Often-cited papal pronouncements regarding organ donation emphasize the importance of gift giving and the consent of the donor. However, a critical reading reveals an ill-defined separation of living organ donation and donation after death. Given that a corpse cannot engage in gift giving, nor can it give consent, the family, acting as good stewards, is the proper decision maker for organ donation after death. A historical examination of relics and human anatomical dissection reveals that the Catholic Church has primarily favored the decisional authority of the family over the first-person consent of the dead. Given this history, family-based consent (as opposed to opt-in or opt-out criteria) is the best model to ensure the dignity of the dead.","PeriodicalId":86269,"journal":{"name":"The national Catholic bioethics quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The national Catholic bioethics quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/ncbq202121226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Often-cited papal pronouncements regarding organ donation emphasize the importance of gift giving and the consent of the donor. However, a critical reading reveals an ill-defined separation of living organ donation and donation after death. Given that a corpse cannot engage in gift giving, nor can it give consent, the family, acting as good stewards, is the proper decision maker for organ donation after death. A historical examination of relics and human anatomical dissection reveals that the Catholic Church has primarily favored the decisional authority of the family over the first-person consent of the dead. Given this history, family-based consent (as opposed to opt-in or opt-out criteria) is the best model to ensure the dignity of the dead.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过家属决策保护器官捐献的自主权和尊严
经常被引用的教皇关于器官捐赠的声明强调了赠送礼物和捐赠者同意的重要性。然而,批判性的解读揭示了活体器官捐赠和死后捐赠的不明确区分。鉴于尸体不能参与馈赠,也不能表示同意,家属作为好管家,是死后器官捐赠的合适决策者。对文物和人体解剖的历史研究表明,天主教会主要倾向于家庭的决策权,而不是死者的第一人称同意。考虑到这段历史,基于家庭的同意(而不是选择加入或选择退出的标准)是确保死者尊严的最佳模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
To Die Is Gain: A Theological (re-)Introduction to the Sacrament of Anointing for Clergy, Laity, Caregivers, and Everyone Else by Roger W. Nutt Teleology and the Problem of Bodily-Rights Arguments Alan Donagan and the Fundamental Principle of Judeo-Christian Morality Illness, Pain, and Health Care in Early Christianity by Helen Rhee Technological Domination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1