Should We Perform Thoracic Imaging for Every Patient with a Renal Mass

IF 0.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY Uroonkoloji Bulteni-Bulletin of Urooncology Pub Date : 2016-09-23 DOI:10.4274/uob.678
A. Şahan, A. Garayev, M. Akgül, T. E. Şener, S. Evman, H. Batirel, E. Bozkurtlar, R. Ahıskalı, L. Türkeri, I. Tinay
{"title":"Should We Perform Thoracic Imaging for Every Patient with a Renal Mass","authors":"A. Şahan, A. Garayev, M. Akgül, T. E. Şener, S. Evman, H. Batirel, E. Bozkurtlar, R. Ahıskalı, L. Türkeri, I. Tinay","doi":"10.4274/uob.678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Current guidelines for the management of renal mass recommend thoracic imaging for potential metastatic nodules. Small size of the renal mass can be associated with low metastatic potential, which might question the necessity of thoracic imaging in this patient population. This study sought to evaluate the association of thoracic imaging findings with the renal mass characteristics in patients with pathologically proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with RCC, who underwent radical/partial nephrectomy and had baseline thoracic imaging available for review. Patients with a suspicious pulmonary mass were evaluated by the Department of Thoracic Surgery. Presence of lung nodule(s) and metastasis was determined and compared with patient and renal mass characteristics. Results: A total of 215 patients were included in the study. Pulmonary nodules suspicious for malignancy were present in 26.8% of the cases and 42% of these patients underwent further examination for the presence of a pulmonary mass. Pathological examination of the pulmonary nodule revealed RCC metastasis in 80% of patients who underwent biopsy or excision of the pulmonary nodule. Of note, in the subgroup analysis according to the pathological stage of the renal mass, 19.3% of patients with pT1a disease had a suspicious pulmonary mass on thoracic imaging. Of these patients, 25% underwent further examination of the pulmonary nodule with a RCC metastasis in 66.6%. Conclusion: The presence of suspicious lung nodules in patients with RCC has metastatic potential regardless of the size of the renal mass. These findings underscore the importance of baseline thoracic imaging and vigilant further evaluation of patients in whom pulmonary nodules are identified.","PeriodicalId":40816,"journal":{"name":"Uroonkoloji Bulteni-Bulletin of Urooncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uroonkoloji Bulteni-Bulletin of Urooncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/uob.678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Current guidelines for the management of renal mass recommend thoracic imaging for potential metastatic nodules. Small size of the renal mass can be associated with low metastatic potential, which might question the necessity of thoracic imaging in this patient population. This study sought to evaluate the association of thoracic imaging findings with the renal mass characteristics in patients with pathologically proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with RCC, who underwent radical/partial nephrectomy and had baseline thoracic imaging available for review. Patients with a suspicious pulmonary mass were evaluated by the Department of Thoracic Surgery. Presence of lung nodule(s) and metastasis was determined and compared with patient and renal mass characteristics. Results: A total of 215 patients were included in the study. Pulmonary nodules suspicious for malignancy were present in 26.8% of the cases and 42% of these patients underwent further examination for the presence of a pulmonary mass. Pathological examination of the pulmonary nodule revealed RCC metastasis in 80% of patients who underwent biopsy or excision of the pulmonary nodule. Of note, in the subgroup analysis according to the pathological stage of the renal mass, 19.3% of patients with pT1a disease had a suspicious pulmonary mass on thoracic imaging. Of these patients, 25% underwent further examination of the pulmonary nodule with a RCC metastasis in 66.6%. Conclusion: The presence of suspicious lung nodules in patients with RCC has metastatic potential regardless of the size of the renal mass. These findings underscore the importance of baseline thoracic imaging and vigilant further evaluation of patients in whom pulmonary nodules are identified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每个有肾肿块的病人都应该做胸部影像学检查吗
目的:当前肾肿块治疗指南推荐对潜在转移性结节进行胸部影像学检查。肾肿块体积小可能与低转移潜力有关,这可能会质疑对这类患者进行胸部影像学检查的必要性。本研究旨在评估经病理证实的肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的胸部影像学表现与肾肿块特征的关系。材料和方法:我们对肾细胞癌患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者接受了根治性/部分性肾切除术,并有基线胸部影像学检查。可疑肺肿块患者由胸外科评估。确定肺结节和转移的存在,并与患者和肾肿块特征进行比较。结果:共纳入215例患者。26.8%的病例存在疑似恶性肺结节,其中42%的患者接受了肺部肿块的进一步检查。肺结节的病理检查显示80%接受肺结节活检或切除的患者有肾细胞癌转移。值得注意的是,在根据肾肿块病理分期进行的亚组分析中,19.3%的pT1a患者在胸部影像学上有可疑的肺肿块。在这些患者中,25%的患者接受了进一步的肺结节检查,66.6%的患者有肾细胞癌转移。结论:不论肾肿块大小,肾癌患者出现可疑肺结节均有转移的可能。这些发现强调了基线胸部影像学的重要性,以及对发现肺结节的患者进行进一步评估的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oncocytic Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Rare Case Report Reflection of Adjuvant Treatment Approaches for Early Stage Testis Tumors in Our Clinic Wunderlich Syndrome, Tuberous Sclerosis-Related Giant Renal Angiomyolipoma Rupture: Case Report Assessment of the Relationship Between Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Level and Serum Fasting Glucose, Total Cholesterol and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Men Aged 50-70 Years with Prostate-Specific Antigen Level 0-10 ng/mL without Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Evaluation of General Characteristics of Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients: A Single Center Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1