Extending the time interval for applying herbicide in cut-stump treatments on American beech

Jeffrey D. Kochenderfer, J. Kochenderfer, G. Miller
{"title":"Extending the time interval for applying herbicide in cut-stump treatments on American beech","authors":"Jeffrey D. Kochenderfer, J. Kochenderfer, G. Miller","doi":"10.5849/NJAF.12-033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"American Beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.) root sprouts often form dense understories that interfere with tree reproduction throughout much of the eastern hardwood region. The cut-stump treatment, whereby herbicide is applied to the stump within a few hours after a larger beech is felled, has been shown to mitigate the interference problem by eliminating beech stems attached to the parent tree's root system. Forest managers are often reluctant to prescribe this treatment because the short time interval between felling the tree and applying herbicide requires the applicator to work in proximity to an active logging operation, raising concerns about safety and efficiency. This study measured the efficacy of the cut-stump treatment on American beech root and stump sprouts for eight time intervals, ranging from 1 to 120 hours, on a 60-acre study site in central West Virginia. Glyphosate as Razor Pro herbicide was diluted to a 65.6% solution with water (26.9% active ingredient) and applied to the outer 2 in. of beech stumps from trees 11-15 in. dbh. The treatments were applied during a cool humid period in September and evaluated 12 months later. Control of root sprouts ranged from 71 to 86%, with no significant differences among the 1- to 96-hour treatments. Efficacy dropped to 50% and 1% for the 120-hour treatment and control treatment, respectively. Stump sprouts were prevented on all stumps treated within 96 hours of tree severing. The results indicated that herbicide can be applied to beech stumps up to four days after severing without reducing control of root and stump sprouts under the conditions in this study. The longer time interval will improve feasibility, safety, and efficiency of the cut-stump treatment. In practice, the effective time interval may vary depending on season of the year and weather conditions.","PeriodicalId":19281,"journal":{"name":"Northern Journal of Applied Forestry","volume":"30 1","pages":"118-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5849/NJAF.12-033","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern Journal of Applied Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5849/NJAF.12-033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

American Beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.) root sprouts often form dense understories that interfere with tree reproduction throughout much of the eastern hardwood region. The cut-stump treatment, whereby herbicide is applied to the stump within a few hours after a larger beech is felled, has been shown to mitigate the interference problem by eliminating beech stems attached to the parent tree's root system. Forest managers are often reluctant to prescribe this treatment because the short time interval between felling the tree and applying herbicide requires the applicator to work in proximity to an active logging operation, raising concerns about safety and efficiency. This study measured the efficacy of the cut-stump treatment on American beech root and stump sprouts for eight time intervals, ranging from 1 to 120 hours, on a 60-acre study site in central West Virginia. Glyphosate as Razor Pro herbicide was diluted to a 65.6% solution with water (26.9% active ingredient) and applied to the outer 2 in. of beech stumps from trees 11-15 in. dbh. The treatments were applied during a cool humid period in September and evaluated 12 months later. Control of root sprouts ranged from 71 to 86%, with no significant differences among the 1- to 96-hour treatments. Efficacy dropped to 50% and 1% for the 120-hour treatment and control treatment, respectively. Stump sprouts were prevented on all stumps treated within 96 hours of tree severing. The results indicated that herbicide can be applied to beech stumps up to four days after severing without reducing control of root and stump sprouts under the conditions in this study. The longer time interval will improve feasibility, safety, and efficiency of the cut-stump treatment. In practice, the effective time interval may vary depending on season of the year and weather conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
延长美洲山毛榉断枝处理中施用除草剂的时间间隔
美洲山毛榉(Fagus grande folia Ehrh.)的根芽通常形成浓密的林下植被,干扰了东部大部分硬木地区的树木繁殖。割桩处理,即在一棵较大的山毛榉被砍伐后的几个小时内对树桩施用除草剂,已被证明可以通过消除附着在母树根系上的山毛榉茎来缓解干扰问题。森林管理者通常不愿意使用这种处理方法,因为砍伐树木和使用除草剂之间的时间间隔很短,需要施药器在活跃的伐木作业附近工作,这引起了对安全性和效率的担忧。这项研究在西弗吉尼亚州中部一个60英亩的研究地点测量了切桩处理对美洲山毛榉根和树桩芽的效果,时间间隔为8个,从1到120小时不等。草甘膦作为Razor Pro除草剂,用水稀释至65.6%的溶液(26.9%的有效成分),并施用于外2英寸。11-15英寸的山毛榉树桩。胸径。这些处理在9月份凉爽潮湿的时期进行,并在12个月后进行评估。根芽控制率为71% ~ 86%,处理1 ~ 96 h间无显著差异。120小时治疗和对照治疗的疗效分别下降到50%和1%。在砍树96小时内,所有处理过的树桩均未发生树桩芽。结果表明,在本试验条件下,在不减少对山毛榉残根和残芽控制的情况下,在断枝后4天内可对山毛榉残根施用除草剂。较长的时间间隔将提高截桩处理的可行性、安全性和效率。实际上,有效时间间隔可能因季节和天气条件而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊最新文献
In Defence of the Normative Account of Ignorance. A rare case report of panuveitis with retinochoroidal involvement, retinitis, and retinal vasculitis due to extensive tinea corporis. Practical Implications of Projecting a Horizontal Angle in a Nonhorizontal Manner to Diameter at Breast Height Impact of Whole-Tree and Cut-to-Length Harvesting on Postharvest Condition and Logging Costs for Early Commercial Thinning in Maine Precommercial Crop Tree Release Increases Upper Canopy Persistence and Diameter Growth of Oak Saplings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1