国际移民治理视角下的欧洲难民危机研究/The European Refugee Crisis from the Perspective of International Migration Governance

Xie Tingting, Huang Rihan
{"title":"国际移民治理视角下的欧洲难民危机研究/The European Refugee Crisis from the Perspective of International Migration Governance","authors":"Xie Tingting, Huang Rihan","doi":"10.5278/ojs.jcir.v3i2.1310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2015年以来涌入欧洲的难民人数大幅增加,不仅影响到欧洲社会秩序的稳定与团结,更对欧洲经济社会的发展造成一定压力。面对不断上升的难民危机,是拒绝还是接纳,欧洲面临人道主义和国家利益的两难选择。本文从国际移民的跨国流动对国家边界内的治理能力所带来的冲击和挑战切入,结合国际移民政策理论分析了国家的三类基本选择,并进一步从国际移民治理机制公共产品的角度为欧洲难民危机的解决提供全新的思考路径。当然,中国也应抓住机会成为国际移民治理机制的倡导者,参与到全球治理的规则制定之中。 The influx of refugees in Europe in 2015 has greatly increased, which not only affects the stability and unity of European society, but also exerts certain pressure on its economic development. In the face of the refugee crisis, it is a dilemma for the European countries to choose either humanitarian or national interests. Starting from the impact and challenge that international migration has had on effective governance within national boundaries, this paper uses the theories of international migration to analyze the three basic choices. Further, the authors provide a new way of thinking about the European refugee crisis from the perspective of international migration governance mechanisms. Of course, China should seize the opportunity to become an advocate of the international migration governance mechanism and rule maker of the global governance.","PeriodicalId":37130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of China and International Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of China and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jcir.v3i2.1310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

2015年以来涌入欧洲的难民人数大幅增加,不仅影响到欧洲社会秩序的稳定与团结,更对欧洲经济社会的发展造成一定压力。面对不断上升的难民危机,是拒绝还是接纳,欧洲面临人道主义和国家利益的两难选择。本文从国际移民的跨国流动对国家边界内的治理能力所带来的冲击和挑战切入,结合国际移民政策理论分析了国家的三类基本选择,并进一步从国际移民治理机制公共产品的角度为欧洲难民危机的解决提供全新的思考路径。当然,中国也应抓住机会成为国际移民治理机制的倡导者,参与到全球治理的规则制定之中。 The influx of refugees in Europe in 2015 has greatly increased, which not only affects the stability and unity of European society, but also exerts certain pressure on its economic development. In the face of the refugee crisis, it is a dilemma for the European countries to choose either humanitarian or national interests. Starting from the impact and challenge that international migration has had on effective governance within national boundaries, this paper uses the theories of international migration to analyze the three basic choices. Further, the authors provide a new way of thinking about the European refugee crisis from the perspective of international migration governance mechanisms. Of course, China should seize the opportunity to become an advocate of the international migration governance mechanism and rule maker of the global governance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际移民治理视角下的欧洲难民危机研究/The European Refugee Crisis from the Perspective of International Migration Governance
2015年以来涌入欧洲的难民人数大幅增加,不仅影响到欧洲社会秩序的稳定与团结,更对欧洲经济社会的发展造成一定压力。面对不断上升的难民危机,是拒绝还是接纳,欧洲面临人道主义和国家利益的两难选择。本文从国际移民的跨国流动对国家边界内的治理能力所带来的冲击和挑战切入,结合国际移民政策理论分析了国家的三类基本选择,并进一步从国际移民治理机制公共产品的角度为欧洲难民危机的解决提供全新的思考路径。当然,中国也应抓住机会成为国际移民治理机制的倡导者,参与到全球治理的规则制定之中。 The influx of refugees in Europe in 2015 has greatly increased, which not only affects the stability and unity of European society, but also exerts certain pressure on its economic development. In the face of the refugee crisis, it is a dilemma for the European countries to choose either humanitarian or national interests. Starting from the impact and challenge that international migration has had on effective governance within national boundaries, this paper uses the theories of international migration to analyze the three basic choices. Further, the authors provide a new way of thinking about the European refugee crisis from the perspective of international migration governance mechanisms. Of course, China should seize the opportunity to become an advocate of the international migration governance mechanism and rule maker of the global governance.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of China and International Relations
Journal of China and International Relations Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
New Perspectives on the BRICS Countries Belt and Road Initiative and China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: Geopolitical Challenges. Brazil and China Interests in Atlantic Africa: Convergences, Divergences and Opportunities for Cooperation Inside the BRICS Forum Framework Russia, BRICS and Cyber Power: International Relations Theory and the BRICS Phenomenon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1