Sonority Is Different

Q2 Arts and Humanities Studies in Polish Linguistics Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.4467/23005920spl.19.009.10989
Tobias Scheer
{"title":"Sonority Is Different","authors":"Tobias Scheer","doi":"10.4467/23005920spl.19.009.10989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper argues that sonority on the one hand and other segmental properties such as place of articulation (labiality etc.) and laryngeal properties (voicing etc.) on the other hand are different in kind and must therefore not be represented alike: implementations on a par e.g. as features ([±voc], [±son], [±lab], [±voice] etc.) are misled. Arguments come from a number of broad, cross-linguistically stable facts concerning visibility of items below and above the skeleton in phonological and morphological processing: sonority, but no other segmental property, is taken into account when syllable structure is built (upward visibility); processes located above the skeleton (infixation, phonologically conditioned allomorphy, stress, tone, positional strength) do make reference to sonority, but never to labiality, voicing etc. (downward visibility). Approaches are discussed where sonority is encoded as structure, rather than as primes (features or Elements). In some cases not only sonority but also other segmental properties are structuralized, a solution that does not do justice to the insight that sonority and melody are different in kind. Also, the approaches that structuralize sonority are not concerned with the question how the representations they entertain come into being: representations are not contained in the phonetic signal that is the input to the linguistic system, nor do they fall from heaven – they are built by some computation. It is therefore concluded that what really segregates sonority and melody is their belonging to two distinct computational systems (modules in the Fodorian sense) which operate over distinct vocabularies and produce distinct structure: sonority primes are used to build syllable structure, while other computations take other types of primes as an input. The computation carrying out a palatalization for example works with melodic primes. The segment, then, is a lexical recording that has different compartments containing domain-specific primes [<sonority>, <melody>] segment . This is also the case of the morpheme, which hosts three compartments [<morpho-synt>, <sem>, <phon>] morpheme .","PeriodicalId":37336,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Polish Linguistics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Polish Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920spl.19.009.10989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper argues that sonority on the one hand and other segmental properties such as place of articulation (labiality etc.) and laryngeal properties (voicing etc.) on the other hand are different in kind and must therefore not be represented alike: implementations on a par e.g. as features ([±voc], [±son], [±lab], [±voice] etc.) are misled. Arguments come from a number of broad, cross-linguistically stable facts concerning visibility of items below and above the skeleton in phonological and morphological processing: sonority, but no other segmental property, is taken into account when syllable structure is built (upward visibility); processes located above the skeleton (infixation, phonologically conditioned allomorphy, stress, tone, positional strength) do make reference to sonority, but never to labiality, voicing etc. (downward visibility). Approaches are discussed where sonority is encoded as structure, rather than as primes (features or Elements). In some cases not only sonority but also other segmental properties are structuralized, a solution that does not do justice to the insight that sonority and melody are different in kind. Also, the approaches that structuralize sonority are not concerned with the question how the representations they entertain come into being: representations are not contained in the phonetic signal that is the input to the linguistic system, nor do they fall from heaven – they are built by some computation. It is therefore concluded that what really segregates sonority and melody is their belonging to two distinct computational systems (modules in the Fodorian sense) which operate over distinct vocabularies and produce distinct structure: sonority primes are used to build syllable structure, while other computations take other types of primes as an input. The computation carrying out a palatalization for example works with melodic primes. The segment, then, is a lexical recording that has different compartments containing domain-specific primes [, ] segment . This is also the case of the morpheme, which hosts three compartments [, , ] morpheme .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
声音是不同的
本文认为,一方面,声音和另一方面的其他音段属性,如发音位置(唇性等)和喉部属性(发声等)在种类上是不同的,因此不能用相同的方式表示:例如,作为特征([±voc],[±son],[±lab],[±voice]等)的同等实现是误导的。论点来自于许多广泛的、跨语言的、稳定的事实,这些事实是关于在语音和形态处理中骨骼上下的可见性的:在构建音节结构时,会考虑到响度,但没有考虑到其他音段属性(向上可见性);位于骨架上方的过程(内固定、语音条件异形、重音、音调、位置强度)确实与响度有关,但从不与唇部、发声等有关(向下可见)。讨论了将响度编码为结构而不是素数(特征或元素)的方法。在某些情况下,不仅是响度,还有其他音段属性都是结构化的,这种解决方案并没有公正地看待响度和旋律在种类上的不同。此外,将声音结构化的方法与它们所接受的表征如何产生的问题无关:表征不包含在作为语言系统输入的语音信号中,也不是从天上掉下来的——它们是通过一些计算建立起来的。因此,我们得出结论,真正将声音和旋律区分开来的是它们属于两个不同的计算系统(福多里安意义上的模块),它们在不同的词汇上运行,产生不同的结构:声音质数用于构建音节结构,而其他计算以其他类型的质数作为输入。例如,执行腭化的计算与旋律素数一起工作。因此,片段是一个词法记录,它具有包含特定于域的素数[,]片段的不同分区。语素也是如此,它包含三个单元[,,]语素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Polish Linguistics
Studies in Polish Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Agentive reading in the Middle: The structure of Polish reflexiva tantum Temporal progression in film retellings in Polish: Perspectives on the interaction of the imperfective aspect and narrative principles English-Sourced Direct and Indirect Borrowings in a New Lexicon of Polish Anglicisms Responding to Omicron: Speaker Commitment and Legitimisation in COVID-related Press Conferences Morphopragmatic View on the Ironic Use of Diminutives in Polish
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1