Subjective Global Assessment as a Pre-Operative Nutrition Status Screening Tool for Head and Neck Cancer Patients of a Tertiary Health Care Setting

Snany Surendran, Uma V. Sankar, Santhoshkumar Nochikkattil, Reena Cheekapravan, N. Warrier, S. Babu
{"title":"Subjective Global Assessment as a Pre-Operative Nutrition Status Screening Tool for Head and Neck Cancer Patients of a Tertiary Health Care Setting","authors":"Snany Surendran, Uma V. Sankar, Santhoshkumar Nochikkattil, Reena Cheekapravan, N. Warrier, S. Babu","doi":"10.4236/jct.2022.138048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In India, 57% of patients with head and neck cancers are documented with nutritional compromise. Active nutritional support has been shown to improve outcomes and reduce the cost of treatment in severely malnourished patients. The assessment of nutritional status should be a priority when initiating medical nutrition therapy. We evaluated the agreement between Subjective and Objective evaluation of pre-operative nutrition status of head and neck cancer patients in a tertiary cancer centre. Methods: Two hundred and thirty seven head and neck cancer patients who underwent surgery were eligible. The patients included both males (147) and females (90) with age varying between 23 - 88 years. All patients were screened for preoperative nutrition status objectively as well as subjectively. The association of pre-operative SGA scores (A, B and C) subjectively, and PNS score (0, 1, 2) objectively were tested for statistical significance. Results: The cancer sites included tongue in 82, buccal mucosa in as well as objectively. Conclusion: Subjective global assessment is a simple and inexpensive way to screen the pre-operative nutrition status when com-pared to the other objective assessment tool. SGA has moderate agreement with expensive and complicated objective assessment tools. So it can be a reliable tool for assessing the pre-operative nutrition status.","PeriodicalId":66197,"journal":{"name":"癌症治疗(英文)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"癌症治疗(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2022.138048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In India, 57% of patients with head and neck cancers are documented with nutritional compromise. Active nutritional support has been shown to improve outcomes and reduce the cost of treatment in severely malnourished patients. The assessment of nutritional status should be a priority when initiating medical nutrition therapy. We evaluated the agreement between Subjective and Objective evaluation of pre-operative nutrition status of head and neck cancer patients in a tertiary cancer centre. Methods: Two hundred and thirty seven head and neck cancer patients who underwent surgery were eligible. The patients included both males (147) and females (90) with age varying between 23 - 88 years. All patients were screened for preoperative nutrition status objectively as well as subjectively. The association of pre-operative SGA scores (A, B and C) subjectively, and PNS score (0, 1, 2) objectively were tested for statistical significance. Results: The cancer sites included tongue in 82, buccal mucosa in as well as objectively. Conclusion: Subjective global assessment is a simple and inexpensive way to screen the pre-operative nutrition status when com-pared to the other objective assessment tool. SGA has moderate agreement with expensive and complicated objective assessment tools. So it can be a reliable tool for assessing the pre-operative nutrition status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主观整体评估作为头颈癌患者术前营养状况筛查工具的三级医疗机构
在印度,57%的头颈癌患者有营养不良记录。积极的营养支持已被证明可以改善严重营养不良患者的预后并降低治疗费用。在开始医疗营养治疗时,营养状况的评估应该是优先考虑的。我们对某三级肿瘤中心头颈癌患者术前营养状况主观评价与客观评价的一致性进行了评价。方法:237例接受手术治疗的头颈部肿瘤患者。患者男147例,女90例,年龄23 ~ 88岁。对所有患者进行客观和主观的术前营养状况筛查。主观上,术前SGA评分(A、B、C)与PNS评分(0、1、2)的相关性进行检验,有无统计学意义。结果:82例口腔肿瘤发生部位包括舌部、颊部粘膜;结论:与其他客观评估工具相比,主观全面评估是一种简单、廉价的筛查术前营养状况的方法。SGA与昂贵、复杂的客观评价工具有一定的一致性。因此,它是评估术前营养状况的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1185
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive Analysis of Cancer Incidence and Mortality Trends in Costa Rica: Implications for Public Health. Bat 26 Microsatellite Instability in Oral Cavity Cancers in Senegal Recent Advances in Metabolomics and Therapeutics for Cancer Cachexia Advanced Cutaneous Scalp Eccrine Adenocarcinoma, Diagnosis and Treatment Challenges: A Case Report The Psychological Experience of the Nursing Staff of the Medical Oncology Department in Cameroon: Case of the Yaoundé General Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1