Comparative evaluation of performance and usability of small-scale household composting with different geometric models

IF 0.5 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Ambientais Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.5327/Z2176-947820200757
Juliana Glicerio Dazzi, Poliana Daré Zampirolli Pires, A. Korres, W. M. R. Günther, Fernando Servare Dadalto, J. R. Bringhenti
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of performance and usability of small-scale household composting with different geometric models","authors":"Juliana Glicerio Dazzi, Poliana Daré Zampirolli Pires, A. Korres, W. M. R. Günther, Fernando Servare Dadalto, J. R. Bringhenti","doi":"10.5327/Z2176-947820200757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of layout influence on the operational performance and usability of small-scale composters contributes to produce compact solutions with simplified operation and sanitary safety, suitable for reduced spaces and continued use. This study aims to report the influence of different designs on the composting process and the usability of compost bins. Five composters of similar scale (3 liters) and different geometric shapes were designed, manufactured, and tested. Bench tests were carried out for 60 days, and physical, chemical, and sanitary parameters were monitored, as well as the quality of the compost, according to agronomic parameters. The composters were filled with the same proportions of organic res-idues (food residues, dry leaves, and lawn trimming) to obtain the ideal C:N ratio. Three ge-ometrical layouts were tested concerning usability (hexagonal prism, cube, and parallelepi-ped) by volunteers for 50 days. The performed tests associated with the statistical treatment of results showed that the geometry of the prototypes interfered with the quality of the final compost and the composter operation. The hexagonal prism and the cube showed greater us-ability. The results represent a significant contribution to the advancement of solutions in decentralized composting.","PeriodicalId":33560,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Ambientais","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Ambientais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-947820200757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The evaluation of layout influence on the operational performance and usability of small-scale composters contributes to produce compact solutions with simplified operation and sanitary safety, suitable for reduced spaces and continued use. This study aims to report the influence of different designs on the composting process and the usability of compost bins. Five composters of similar scale (3 liters) and different geometric shapes were designed, manufactured, and tested. Bench tests were carried out for 60 days, and physical, chemical, and sanitary parameters were monitored, as well as the quality of the compost, according to agronomic parameters. The composters were filled with the same proportions of organic res-idues (food residues, dry leaves, and lawn trimming) to obtain the ideal C:N ratio. Three ge-ometrical layouts were tested concerning usability (hexagonal prism, cube, and parallelepi-ped) by volunteers for 50 days. The performed tests associated with the statistical treatment of results showed that the geometry of the prototypes interfered with the quality of the final compost and the composter operation. The hexagonal prism and the cube showed greater us-ability. The results represent a significant contribution to the advancement of solutions in decentralized composting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同几何模型下小型家庭堆肥的性能和可用性的比较评价
对布局对小型堆肥机的操作性能和可用性的影响进行评估,有助于产生紧凑的解决方案,简化操作和卫生安全,适合缩小空间和持续使用。本研究旨在报告不同设计对堆肥过程和堆肥箱可用性的影响。设计、制造和测试了5个相似规模(3升)、不同几何形状的堆肥器。进行了为期60天的台架试验,并根据农艺参数监测了物理、化学和卫生参数以及堆肥的质量。堆肥器中填入相同比例的有机残留物(食物残渣、干树叶和草坪修剪物),以获得理想的碳氮比。志愿者对三种几何布局(六边形棱镜、立方体和平行六面体)的可用性进行了50天的测试。已进行的与统计处理结果相关的试验表明,原型的几何形状干扰了最终堆肥的质量和堆肥机的操作。六角形棱镜和立方体显示出更强的自我能力。研究结果对分散式堆肥解决方案的进步做出了重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Water loss associated with food loss and waste in Brazil Model of integrated territorial assessment for environmental justice applied to sanitation Study on Brazilian agribusiness wastewaters: composition, physical‑chemical characterization, volumetric production and resource recovery Optimization of palm oil biodiesel production using response surface methodology Stock and indices of carbon management under different soil use systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1