Duality and Resilience in Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Philosophia Africana Pub Date : 2007-04-01 DOI:10.5840/PHILAFRICANA200710110
Chima Anyadike
{"title":"Duality and Resilience in Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart","authors":"Chima Anyadike","doi":"10.5840/PHILAFRICANA200710110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many readers and critics of Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart come to the easy conclusion that the hero of the novel, Okonkwo, exemplifies or represents Umuofia or Igbo culture and traditions and that the author uses Okonkwo's story to show the process of the collapse of those traditions when they came into conflict with a more powerful colonial culture. Bernth Lindfors, for instance, understands Arlene Elder as saying that Okonkwo is \"a typical Igbo man,\" used by the author to portray the \"suicidal fragmentation of Igbo society\" during the colonial era (Lindfors, 17). The result, in Clayton MacKenzie's reading of the novel, is that \" . . . the Umuofia come to believe in the supremacy of the missionary colonizers as devoutly as they once had in their own theatre of gods\" (MacKenzie, 126). However, there are readers of Things Fall Apart who perceive a resilience in Umuofia society which in their view ensures that the center holds, even if things have fallen apart (Sarr, 1993). In this essay, I want to locate the source of that resilience in the twin notions of duality and balance, central to the Umuofia view of life and the world. I argue that these notions form the basis of the conceptual framework which structures the ambivalence at the core of the novel and that they help to explain the Igbo man's tendency to look both backwards and forwards. It is not quite correct to assert, as MacKenzie does, that \" . . . the interrelation between the two (the new religion and traditional society) can never be characterized in terms of co-existence, because the economics of Mr. Brown's religion demand ideological substitution, not concurrence or hybridization.\" {RAL) He may be right about the demand, but certainly not right in his characterization of that relationship as \"a logical, business transaction\" which the clan finds \"as compelling as it did obedience to the Oracle of the Hills and Caves.\"(Ri4L) The Igbo metaphysical landscape did not disappear from Umuofia with one straight business deal. Perhaps it is more correct to say that yet another duality, tradition and modernity, entered the landscape to join others like male and female, individual and community, spiritual and material, thereby providing those ready to understand the governing principles and how they are put to profitable use opportunities","PeriodicalId":42045,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia Africana","volume":"10 1","pages":"49-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia Africana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/PHILAFRICANA200710110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Many readers and critics of Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart come to the easy conclusion that the hero of the novel, Okonkwo, exemplifies or represents Umuofia or Igbo culture and traditions and that the author uses Okonkwo's story to show the process of the collapse of those traditions when they came into conflict with a more powerful colonial culture. Bernth Lindfors, for instance, understands Arlene Elder as saying that Okonkwo is "a typical Igbo man," used by the author to portray the "suicidal fragmentation of Igbo society" during the colonial era (Lindfors, 17). The result, in Clayton MacKenzie's reading of the novel, is that " . . . the Umuofia come to believe in the supremacy of the missionary colonizers as devoutly as they once had in their own theatre of gods" (MacKenzie, 126). However, there are readers of Things Fall Apart who perceive a resilience in Umuofia society which in their view ensures that the center holds, even if things have fallen apart (Sarr, 1993). In this essay, I want to locate the source of that resilience in the twin notions of duality and balance, central to the Umuofia view of life and the world. I argue that these notions form the basis of the conceptual framework which structures the ambivalence at the core of the novel and that they help to explain the Igbo man's tendency to look both backwards and forwards. It is not quite correct to assert, as MacKenzie does, that " . . . the interrelation between the two (the new religion and traditional society) can never be characterized in terms of co-existence, because the economics of Mr. Brown's religion demand ideological substitution, not concurrence or hybridization." {RAL) He may be right about the demand, but certainly not right in his characterization of that relationship as "a logical, business transaction" which the clan finds "as compelling as it did obedience to the Oracle of the Hills and Caves."(Ri4L) The Igbo metaphysical landscape did not disappear from Umuofia with one straight business deal. Perhaps it is more correct to say that yet another duality, tradition and modernity, entered the landscape to join others like male and female, individual and community, spiritual and material, thereby providing those ready to understand the governing principles and how they are put to profitable use opportunities
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奇努阿·阿契贝的《分崩离析》中的双重性和韧性
奇努阿·阿奇贝的《分崩离析》一书的许多读者和评论家都很容易得出这样的结论:小说的主人公奥康科沃是乌莫菲亚或伊博文化和传统的例证或代表,作者用奥康科沃的故事来展示这些传统在与更强大的殖民文化发生冲突时崩溃的过程。例如,Bernth Lindfors理解Arlene Elder所说的Okonkwo是“一个典型的伊博人”,作者用它来描述殖民时期“伊博社会的自杀式分裂”(Lindfors, 17)。结果,在克莱顿·麦肯齐(Clayton MacKenzie)对小说的解读中,是“……乌莫菲亚人开始虔诚地相信传教士殖民者的至高无上,就像他们曾经虔诚地相信自己的神的剧场一样”(麦肯齐,126)。然而,也有《分崩离析》的读者认为Umuofia社会有一种弹性,在他们看来,这种弹性确保了中心的存在,即使事情已经分崩离析(Sarr, 1993)。在这篇文章中,我想在二元和平衡的双重概念中找到这种韧性的来源,这是乌莫菲亚人对生活和世界的看法的核心。我认为,这些概念构成了构成小说核心矛盾心理的概念框架的基础,它们有助于解释伊博人既向后看又向前看的倾向。像麦肯齐那样断言“……两者(新宗教和传统社会)的相互关系永远不能以共存的方式来描述,因为布朗先生的宗教经济学要求的是意识形态的替代,而不是共存或杂交。他对需求的看法可能是正确的,但他将这种关系描述为“一种合乎逻辑的商业交易”肯定是不正确的,部落发现“就像服从山洞神谕一样令人信服”(Ri4L)伊博形而上学的景观并没有因为一笔直接的商业交易而从乌莫菲亚消失。也许更正确的说法是,另一种二元性,传统和现代,进入了景观,加入了男性和女性,个人和社区,精神和物质等其他方面,从而为那些准备好理解支配原则以及如何将它们用于有利可图的机会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophia Africana
Philosophia Africana PHILOSOPHY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Enactivist African Philosophy: A Response A New Approach to African Philosophy: A Critique What Is Native to Philosophy? A Critique of Wiredu’s Project of Conceptual Decolonization of African Philosophy Spaces of Thought: A Response to Critiques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1