Triceps brachii muscle architecture, upper-body rate of force development, and bench press maximum strength of strong and weak trained participants

Q2 Health Professions Human Movement Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/hm.2023.113714
Nikolaos Zaras, Angeliki-nikoletta E. Stasinaki, Polyxeni Spiliopoulou, T. Mpampoulis, G. Terzis
{"title":"Triceps brachii muscle architecture, upper-body rate of force development, and bench press maximum strength of strong and weak trained participants","authors":"Nikolaos Zaras, Angeliki-nikoletta E. Stasinaki, Polyxeni Spiliopoulou, T. Mpampoulis, G. Terzis","doi":"10.5114/hm.2023.113714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. the study aim was: (a) to investigate the relationship between triceps brachii muscle architecture and upper-body isometric rate of force development (rFD), isometric peak force (IPF), and maximum strength (one-repetition maximum, 1-rM) in bench press and (b) to explore whether triceps brachii architecture might determine rFD, IPF, and 1-rM strength in stronger and weaker participants. Methods. the study involved 21 males (age: 22.6 ± 4.7 years, weight: 76.6 ± 10.2 kg, height: 1.79 ± 0.07 m) with 3.4 ± 2.1 years of experience in resistance training. they were divided into a strong and weak group depending on their relative 1-rM strength in bench press. Measurements included triceps brachii muscle architecture, upper-body isometric rFD, IPF, and 1-rM strength in bench press. Results. Moderate to large correlations were found for triceps brachii thickness and fascicle angle with upper-body rFD ( r : 0.379–0.627), IPF ( r : 0.582 and 0.564, respectively), and 1-rM strength in bench press ( r : 0.530 and 0.412, respectively). Maximum strength in bench press was largely correlated with IPF ( r = 0.816); moderate to very large correlations were observed with rFD ( r : 0.499–0.725). the strong group presented significantly higher 1-rM relative strength, rFD, and IPF ( p < 0.05) than the weak group, but no significant between-group difference was found for triceps brachii architecture ( p > 0.05). Conclusions. triceps brachii architecture correlates with 1-rM strength, upper-body rFD, and IPF in trained participants. However, triceps brachii architecture may not distinguish upper-body strength and rFD between stronger and weaker male participants.","PeriodicalId":35354,"journal":{"name":"Human Movement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hm.2023.113714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose. the study aim was: (a) to investigate the relationship between triceps brachii muscle architecture and upper-body isometric rate of force development (rFD), isometric peak force (IPF), and maximum strength (one-repetition maximum, 1-rM) in bench press and (b) to explore whether triceps brachii architecture might determine rFD, IPF, and 1-rM strength in stronger and weaker participants. Methods. the study involved 21 males (age: 22.6 ± 4.7 years, weight: 76.6 ± 10.2 kg, height: 1.79 ± 0.07 m) with 3.4 ± 2.1 years of experience in resistance training. they were divided into a strong and weak group depending on their relative 1-rM strength in bench press. Measurements included triceps brachii muscle architecture, upper-body isometric rFD, IPF, and 1-rM strength in bench press. Results. Moderate to large correlations were found for triceps brachii thickness and fascicle angle with upper-body rFD ( r : 0.379–0.627), IPF ( r : 0.582 and 0.564, respectively), and 1-rM strength in bench press ( r : 0.530 and 0.412, respectively). Maximum strength in bench press was largely correlated with IPF ( r = 0.816); moderate to very large correlations were observed with rFD ( r : 0.499–0.725). the strong group presented significantly higher 1-rM relative strength, rFD, and IPF ( p < 0.05) than the weak group, but no significant between-group difference was found for triceps brachii architecture ( p > 0.05). Conclusions. triceps brachii architecture correlates with 1-rM strength, upper-body rFD, and IPF in trained participants. However, triceps brachii architecture may not distinguish upper-body strength and rFD between stronger and weaker male participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肱三头肌结构,上肢力量发展速率,卧推强弱训练参与者的最大力量
目的。本研究的目的是:(a)探讨肱三头肌结构与卧推上肢等距力发展速率(rFD)、等距峰值力(IPF)和最大力量(1-rM)之间的关系;(b)探讨肱三头肌结构是否可能决定强弱参与者的rFD、IPF和1-rM力量。方法。研究对象为21名男性,年龄22.6±4.7岁,体重76.6±10.2 kg,身高1.79±0.07 m,具有3.4±2.1年抗阻训练经验。根据他们在卧推中的相对1-rM强度,他们被分为强弱组。测量包括肱三头肌结构、上肢等距rFD、IPF和卧推1-rM力量。结果。肱三头肌厚度和肌束角与上体rFD (r: 0.379 ~ 0.627)、IPF (r: 0.582和0.564)和卧推1-rM强度(r: 0.530和0.412)呈中高相关性。卧压机最大强度与IPF呈显著相关(r = 0.816);与rFD存在中度至非常大的相关性(r: 0.499-0.725)。强组1-rM相对强度、rFD和IPF显著高于弱组(p < 0.05),肱三头肌结构组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论。肱三头肌结构与训练参与者的1-rM力量、上肢rFD和IPF相关。然而,肱三头肌结构可能无法区分强壮和较弱男性参与者的上肢力量和rFD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Movement
Human Movement Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Postural control and ankle joint functions: an investigation on collegiate female volleyball players Assessment of the correlation between the occurrence of fine movements of the hand, pre-frailty, and body composition in the elderly Does the direction of shapes and bodies influence the aesthetic perception of stage setups in dance? Adhesive elastic tape modifies forefoot motion in young women with flatfoot Performance enhancing strategies in sailing sports: beyond training and nutrition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1