Evaluation of urinalysis pre-analytical phase in a private laboratory of Maringá city, Paraná, Brazil

Mariana M. Saramela, T. Fernandes
{"title":"Evaluation of urinalysis pre-analytical phase in a private laboratory of Maringá city, Paraná, Brazil","authors":"Mariana M. Saramela, T. Fernandes","doi":"10.5935/1676-2444.20210013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Routine urinalysis is among the most requested exams in the clinical laboratory, assisting in the diagnosis of various diseases and treatment follow-up. In this case, the pre-analytical phase is extremely important because the quality of the sample directly influences the analysis and interpretation of the result. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the main errors in the pre-analytical phase of routine urine examination in a private laboratory and their frequency of occurrence. Material and method: Data were collected from 2014 to 2018. In all, 107,277 urine samples were registered and 98 (0.09%) were sent for recollection. Results: Recollect requests were higher among females (81.6%), and the most affected age groups were 51 to 60 years old and 21 to 30 years old. The most common justification for recollection was insufficient material (48.0%), followed by confirmation of results in 24.5% of cases. The predominance of urine recollection in women was due to their having urine tests more often since they are more prone to urinary tract infections, especially in the sexually active and postmenopausal life stages. Conclusion: In general, the urine recollection rate obtained in the research was lower than the goal set by the laboratory; however, the main reasons that led to recollection request could be avoided or minimized if patients had been well educated on the correct collection procedures, indicating the need for constant training and training programs of the work team.","PeriodicalId":35397,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1676-2444.20210013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Routine urinalysis is among the most requested exams in the clinical laboratory, assisting in the diagnosis of various diseases and treatment follow-up. In this case, the pre-analytical phase is extremely important because the quality of the sample directly influences the analysis and interpretation of the result. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the main errors in the pre-analytical phase of routine urine examination in a private laboratory and their frequency of occurrence. Material and method: Data were collected from 2014 to 2018. In all, 107,277 urine samples were registered and 98 (0.09%) were sent for recollection. Results: Recollect requests were higher among females (81.6%), and the most affected age groups were 51 to 60 years old and 21 to 30 years old. The most common justification for recollection was insufficient material (48.0%), followed by confirmation of results in 24.5% of cases. The predominance of urine recollection in women was due to their having urine tests more often since they are more prone to urinary tract infections, especially in the sexually active and postmenopausal life stages. Conclusion: In general, the urine recollection rate obtained in the research was lower than the goal set by the laboratory; however, the main reasons that led to recollection request could be avoided or minimized if patients had been well educated on the correct collection procedures, indicating the need for constant training and training programs of the work team.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西帕拉那岛马林市一家私人实验室尿液分析前分析阶段的评估
导读:尿常规分析是临床检验科最需要的检查之一,有助于各种疾病的诊断和治疗随访。在这种情况下,分析前阶段非常重要,因为样品的质量直接影响结果的分析和解释。目的:本研究的目的是确定在私人实验室常规尿液检查分析前阶段的主要错误及其发生频率。材料与方法:数据收集时间为2014 - 2018年。总共登记了107,277份尿液样本,其中98份(0.09%)用于回收。结果:女性的回忆请求率较高(81.6%),其中51 ~ 60岁和21 ~ 30岁是影响最多的年龄组。回忆最常见的理由是材料不足(48.0%),其次是确认结果(24.5%)。尿液回忆在女性中占主导地位是由于她们尿检更频繁,因为她们更容易发生尿路感染,特别是在性活跃和绝经后的生活阶段。结论:总体而言,本研究获得的尿回忆率低于实验室设定的目标;然而,如果对患者进行了正确的收集程序的良好教育,则可以避免或尽量减少导致召回请求的主要原因,这表明需要对工作团队进行持续的培训和培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial
Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Brazilian Journal of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine), a continuation of Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia (Brazilian Journal of Pathology), and published quarterly (March, June, September and December) is directed towards the publication of scientific articles that contribute to the development of the area of Laboratory Medicine (Clinical Pathology, Pathology, Cytopathology). It accepts the following categories of articles: original articles, review articles, case reports, short communications, updating articles, letters to editors and reviews.
期刊最新文献
The influence of tobacco and alcohol in oral cancer: literature review Umbilical cord constriction as a cause of intrauterine fetal death Consequences of late diagnosis paracoccidioidomycosis: case report Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type: case report Impact of urinary selective antibiogram in primary care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1