Michael Kirk, Sarah R Hunter-Smith, Katrina M. Smith, D. Hunter-Smith
{"title":"THE ROLE OF SMARTPHONES IN THE RECORDING AND DISSEMINATION OF MEDICAL IMAGES","authors":"Michael Kirk, Sarah R Hunter-Smith, Katrina M. Smith, D. Hunter-Smith","doi":"10.7309/JMTM.3.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Smartphones have evolved rapidly in the medical profession, and can now produce highquality medical images, providing a quick and simple method of image distribution. This has thepotential to improve clinical care of patients, but comes with specific ethical and medico-legalconsiderations that include issues of confidentiality, privacy and policy control.Aim: To quantify the use, distribution and storage of medical images taken using smartphones byclinicians, along with their perceptions regarding policies, practices and patient care.Methods: All clinicians and medical students employed or undergoing rotation at Peninsula Healthduring March 2012 were asked to participate in a de-identified, 36 item, online survey administeredby SurveyMonkey. The survey questioned respondent’s demographics, and issues surrounding therecording and dissemination of medical images using smartphones.Results: 134 responses were received. Most respondents were from the surgical discipline, followedby medicine, then emergency. Sixty five per cent admitted to taking medical images on theirsmartphones, yet no consent was obtained in almost a quarter (24%). When consent was taken, itwas predominantly verbal, but only documented 23% of the time. Of those who took medicalimages, 64% stored them personally and 82% shared them with someone else, mostly for input fromanother clinician. Forty three per cent were aware that an institutional policy existed, but only 28%had read the policy.Conclusion: Whilst the use of smartphones in a hospital setting is inevitable, the results obtainedhighlight issues related to privacy, confidentiality and patient care. This study will enable discussionand formulation of an evidence-based hospital policy","PeriodicalId":87305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"40-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7309/JMTM.3.2.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Abstract
Background:Smartphones have evolved rapidly in the medical profession, and can now produce highquality medical images, providing a quick and simple method of image distribution. This has thepotential to improve clinical care of patients, but comes with specific ethical and medico-legalconsiderations that include issues of confidentiality, privacy and policy control.Aim: To quantify the use, distribution and storage of medical images taken using smartphones byclinicians, along with their perceptions regarding policies, practices and patient care.Methods: All clinicians and medical students employed or undergoing rotation at Peninsula Healthduring March 2012 were asked to participate in a de-identified, 36 item, online survey administeredby SurveyMonkey. The survey questioned respondent’s demographics, and issues surrounding therecording and dissemination of medical images using smartphones.Results: 134 responses were received. Most respondents were from the surgical discipline, followedby medicine, then emergency. Sixty five per cent admitted to taking medical images on theirsmartphones, yet no consent was obtained in almost a quarter (24%). When consent was taken, itwas predominantly verbal, but only documented 23% of the time. Of those who took medicalimages, 64% stored them personally and 82% shared them with someone else, mostly for input fromanother clinician. Forty three per cent were aware that an institutional policy existed, but only 28%had read the policy.Conclusion: Whilst the use of smartphones in a hospital setting is inevitable, the results obtainedhighlight issues related to privacy, confidentiality and patient care. This study will enable discussionand formulation of an evidence-based hospital policy